Essay 2022 Essay Paper 125 marks 1200 words Critically analyse

Q2

Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

कवि संसार के अनधिकृत रूप से मान्य विधायक होते हैं

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Essay questions

Directive word: Critically analyse

This question asks you to critically analyse. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Critically analyse demands a balanced examination of Shelley's claim—neither uncritical acceptance nor outright rejection. Structure: Introduction contextualising the quote → Body exploring multiple dimensions (political, social, moral, aesthetic) with evidence → Critical assessment of limitations → Conclusion on contemporary relevance.

Key points expected

Interpretation of 'unacknowledged legislators'—poets as invisible shapers of values, norms and collective imagination
Historical evidence: Tagore's nationalism, Iqbal's Islamic modernism, Bharati's anti-caste consciousness in India
Global parallels: Neruda's political poetry, Maya Angelou's civil rights impact, Akhmatova under Stalin
Critical counter: Plato's expulsion of poets; poetry's limited efficacy against structural power; commercialisation diluting moral authority
Contemporary relevance: Social media poets, protest poetry (Meena Kandasamy, Varavara Rao), environmental poetry
Synthesis: Poets as legislators of consciousness, not statute—acknowledging both power and limits

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Thesis clarity	20%	25	Precise interpretation of 'unacknowledged legislators' established early; clear argumentative stance on whether poets shape law, values, or collective consciousness; thesis navigates tension between romantic ideal and material reality	Basic understanding of quote shown; thesis present but either too celebratory or too dismissive; some ambiguity about what 'legislation' means in context	Misinterprets quote literally as poets making laws; no clear thesis; merely lists poets without analytical frame
Multi-dimensional coverage	20%	25	Covers political (nation-building, resistance), social (reform movements, caste/gender), moral (ethical imagination), aesthetic (form shaping content), and institutional (patronage, censorship) dimensions with organic connections	3-4 dimensions covered but unevenly; some dimensions mentioned superficially; transitions between dimensions mechanical	Single-dimensional treatment (only political or only aesthetic); dimensions listed without development; no integration between spheres
Examples & evidence	20%	25	Rich Indian examples: Tagore's 'Where the Mind is Without Fear', Bharati's revolutionary Tamil verse, Dalit poetry (Ambedkarite movement), contemporary protest poetry; global examples contextualised; specific poems/lines cited	Some Indian examples present but generic (only Tagore/Gandhi); examples stated without showing legislative impact; more description than demonstration	No Indian examples or only predictable ones; examples irrelevant to 'legislative' function; factual errors about poets/works
Language & flow	20%	25	Essay itself demonstrates literary quality befitting the topic; seamless movement between argument and illustration; effective use of poetic devices where appropriate; disciplined within 1200 words	Clear but unremarkable prose; some abrupt transitions; occasional verbosity or repetition; word count slightly off	Awkward phrasing undermining the topic; choppy paragraphing; significant grammatical errors; grossly over/under word limit
Conclusion & forward look	20%	25	Synthesises critical analysis into nuanced position—poets as legislators of moral imagination, not state power; forward look addresses digital age (Instagram poets, AI poetry), threats to artistic freedom, and poetry's role in democratic decay	Restates thesis without development; forward look generic or absent; conclusion feels pasted rather than earned	No conclusion or abrupt ending; contradicts earlier analysis; no contemporary relevance established

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →