Essay 2023 Essay Paper 125 marks 1200 words Critically analyse
Q5
Girls are weighed down by restrictions, boys with demands — two equally harmful disciplines.
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
लड़कियाँ बंदिशों के तथा लड़के अपेक्षा के बोझ तले दबे हुए होते हैं — दोनों ही समान रूप से हानिकारक व्यवस्थाएँ हैं ।
Directive word: Critically analyse
This question asks you to critically analyse. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Critically analyse the gendered nature of socialisation by unpacking how restrictions on girls and demands on boys operate as parallel systems of discipline that constrain human potential. Structure the essay with an introduction establishing the paradox of patriarchal harm, body paragraphs examining familial, educational, economic and psychological dimensions with balanced treatment of both genders, and a conclusion proposing transformative pathways.
Key points expected
- Analysis of how restrictions on girls (mobility, education, marriage, autonomy) manifest across class/caste/regions in India
- Examination of demands on boys (breadwinner pressure, emotional suppression, toxic masculinity, career expectations)
- Intersectional analysis showing how discipline varies by socioeconomic status, urban/rural divide, and community
- Critical assessment of how both disciplines reinforce patriarchy and limit national development (demographic dividend, gender equality)
- Evidence from government schemes (Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, POSH Act) and their limitations in addressing root causes
- Forward-looking synthesis on dismantling binary gender socialisation through education reform and policy
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis clarity | 20% | 25 | Establishes a nuanced, arguable thesis that recognises both restrictions and demands as structurally interconnected manifestations of patriarchy, not competing oppressions; thesis guides entire essay with clear analytical thread. | Thesis acknowledges both dimensions but treats them as separate problems or leans toward one gender; some analytical tension present but not fully developed. | Thesis is vague, one-sided (focusing only on girls), or merely restates the prompt without analytical intervention; essay lacks coherent argumentative direction. |
| Multi-dimensional coverage | 20% | 25 | Integrates family socialisation, educational institutions, labour markets, mental health outcomes, and political representation with explicit attention to how disciplines mutate across life stages; demonstrates systemic thinking. | Covers 3-4 dimensions adequately but with uneven depth; some dimensions treated descriptively rather than analytically; limited attention to intersectionality. | Superficial treatment restricted to obvious examples (child marriage for girls, career pressure for boys); dimensions covered in isolation without showing interconnection; missing structural analysis. |
| Examples & evidence | 20% | 25 | Deploys specific Indian evidence: NFHS-5 data on son preference, ASER reports on gender gaps, NCRB suicide statistics by gender, case studies (Kerala's gender paradox, Haryana's sex ratio), and contemporary movements (Men's mental health initiatives); examples illuminate rather than illustrate. | Uses some statistical or anecdotal evidence but lacks specificity (e.g., 'studies show' without citation); examples are generic or international without Indian contextualisation; uneven coverage across gender dimensions. | Relies on stereotypes or unsupported assertions; no quantitative evidence; examples are irrelevant or misapplied; essay reads as opinion rather than evidence-based argumentation. |
| Language & flow | 20% | 25 | Sophisticated, precise prose with controlled rhythm; seamless transitions between dimensions; strategic use of rhetorical devices (antithesis, paradox) that reinforce analytical content; maintains empathetic yet critical tone throughout. | Clear, functional language with occasional awkward phrasing; transitions are mechanical but present; tone shifts inconsistently between academic and emotive; some redundancy or verbosity. | Grammatical errors, colloquialisms, or excessive abstraction impede comprehension; disjointed paragraphing; repetitive sentence structures; inappropriate tone (polemical, sentimental, or detached). |
| Conclusion & forward look | 20% | 25 | Synthesises argument into actionable vision: specific policy recommendations (gender-transformative education, paternity leave, mental health integration), institutional reforms, and cultural shifts; acknowledges complexity without retreating to false balance; ends with compelling, forward-looking insight. | Restates main points with generic recommendations (awareness, education); some attempt at synthesis but lacks specificity; conclusion feels obligatory rather than intellectually satisfying. | Introduces new arguments or evidence; mere summary without synthesis; utopian or unrealistic prescriptions; abrupt ending; fails to address 'forward look' component of evaluation. |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Essay 2023 Essay Paper
- Q1 Thinking is like a game, it does not begin unless there is an opposite team.
- Q2 Visionary decision-making happens at the intersection of intuition and logic.
- Q3 Not all who wander are lost.
- Q4 Inspiration for creativity springs from the effort to look for the magical in the mundane.
- Q5 Girls are weighed down by restrictions, boys with demands — two equally harmful disciplines.
- Q6 Mathematics is the music of reason.
- Q7 A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity.
- Q8 Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.