The author wants India to rid herself of certain past bonds because
- (a) he is not able to see the relevance of the past
- (b) there is not much to be proud of
- (c) he is not interested in the history of India
- (d) they obstruct her physical and spiritual growth ✓ UPSC's answer
Why the answer is (d)
• The passage explicitly states the author's desire for India to rid itself of shackles that 'bind and contain her and divide her people'.
• It further specifies that these shackles 'suppress vast numbers of them' and 'prevent the free development of the body and the spirit'.
• The phrase 'free development of the body and the spirit' directly corresponds to physical and spiritual growth.
• Therefore, the primary reason for discarding these specific past bonds is their obstructive nature regarding human development.
• This aligns perfectly with option (d), which identifies the obstruction of physical and spiritual growth as the cause.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) he is not able to see the relevance of the past
- The author explicitly states he is 'proud of that great inheritance' and sees himself as a link in an 'unbroken chain', contradicting the claim that he cannot see the relevance of the past.
- (b) there is not much to be proud of
- The text directly contradicts this by stating, 'I am proud of that great inheritance that has been and is, ours'.
- (c) he is not interested in the history of India
- The author identifies himself as a link in a chain going back to the 'dawn of history', indicating a deep connection to and interest in India's history rather than a lack of it.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2018, held on 3 June 2018. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.