With reference to the above table, the following assumptions have been made : 1. Nowadays, prosperity of an already high performing State cannot be sustained without making further large investments in its telecom infrastructure. 2. Nowadays, a very high Tele-density is the most essential condition for promoting the business and economic growth in a State. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ✓ UPSC's answer
Why the answer is (d)
• Assumption 1 claims that high-performing states cannot sustain prosperity without further large telecom investments, but the table shows State 7 with the highest tele-density (104.86) has a lower GDP growth rate (8.88%) than State 6 (77.5 tele-density, 11.69% growth), disproving the necessity of the highest density for top performance.
• Assumption 2 states that very high tele-density is the most essential condition for business and economic growth, yet State 4 has the lowest tele-density (5.94) but a high GDP growth rate (9.78%), contradicting the claim that high density is essential for growth.
• State 3 has a moderate tele-density (50.07) but the second-highest GDP growth rate (10.83%), further indicating that tele-density is not the most essential condition for economic growth.
• Since both assumptions are contradicted by specific data points in the table where low or moderate tele-density coexists with high GDP growth, neither assumption is valid.
• Therefore, the correct option is (d) Neither 1 nor 2.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) 1 only
- Assumption 1 is invalid because State 6 achieved the highest GDP growth rate (11.69%) with a lower tele-density (77.5) than State 7 (104.86), showing that the highest telecom investment is not required for top performance.
- (b) 2 only
- Assumption 2 is invalid because State 4 recorded a high GDP growth rate (9.78%) despite having the lowest tele-density (5.94) in the table, proving that very high tele-density is not an essential condition for growth.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Both assumptions are invalid as demonstrated by the counter-examples in the data, such as State 4's high growth with low tele-density and State 6's superior growth compared to State 7 despite lower tele-density.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2018, held on 3 June 2018. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.