What is the main idea that we can infer from the passage ?
- (a) Untouchability in India has not been taken seriously by political theorists.
- (b) Historical injustice is inevitable in any society and is always beyond repair.
- (c) Social discrimination and deprivation have their roots in bad economies.
- (d) It is difficult, if not impossible, to repair every manifestation of historical injustice. ✓ UPSC's answer
Why the answer is (d)
• The passage states that historical injustices, such as untouchability, 'tend to resist repair' due to deep historical roots and complex structural overlaps.
• It explains that injustice constitutes economic structures, ideologies, and modes of representation, making the category complex.
• The text notes that specific wrongs, like discrimination, can acquire 'partial autonomy' from other forms of injustice, further complicating the repair process.
• Therefore, the central inference is that repairing all manifestations of historical injustice is extremely difficult, if not impossible, due to these entrenched and autonomous factors.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) Untouchability in India has not been taken seriously by political theorists.
- The passage explicitly states that political theorists 'no doubt have to take history of injustice... seriously,' contradicting the claim that they do not.
- (b) Historical injustice is inevitable in any society and is always beyond repair.
- The passage argues that historical injustice 'tends to resist repair' and is complex, but it does not claim it is 'inevitable' or 'always' beyond repair.
- (c) Social discrimination and deprivation have their roots in bad economies.
- The passage identifies 'economic structures of exploitation' as a component of injustice, not as the sole root cause of social discrimination and deprivation.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2019, held on 2 June 2019. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.