On the basis of the above passage, the following assumptions have been made : 1. Processed probiotic foods are a solution to treat the children suffering from malnutrition due to immature gut bacteria composition. 2. The babies of malnourished mothers generally tend to be malnourished. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Why the answer is (b)
• Assumption 2 is valid because the passage explicitly states that malnourished mothers have low levels of sialylated oligosaccharides in their milk, which prevents the infant's microbiome from maturing, leading to malnourished babies.
• The passage establishes a direct causal link: malnourished mother -> low sugar in milk -> immature microbiome -> malnourished baby.
• Assumption 1 is invalid because the passage does not mention 'processed probiotic foods' as a treatment or solution.
• The passage only explains the biological mechanism of how malnutrition is transmitted via the microbiome, not therapeutic interventions.
• Therefore, only Assumption 2 is supported by the text, making option (b) the correct answer.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) 1 only
- Assumption 1 is not mentioned in the passage, and Assumption 2 is valid, so '1 only' is incorrect.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Assumption 1 is not supported by the passage, so 'Both 1 and 2' is incorrect.
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
- Assumption 2 is directly supported by the passage, so 'Neither 1 nor 2' is incorrect.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2019, held on 2 June 2019. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.