On the basis of the above passage, the following assumptions have been made : 1. State should have some institutions to ensure its appropriate role in a digital society. 2. State should ensure that private parties do not violate the citizens' right to privacy. 3. Digital economy is not compatible with the idea of not violating the citizens' privacy. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
- (a) 1 and 2 ✓ UPSC's answer
- (b) 3 only
- (c) 1 and 3
- (d) 2 only
Why the answer is (a)
• The passage states that the State's role is to actively ensure that private parties do not block rights, implying the need for mechanisms or institutions to enforce this in a digital society, validating Assumption 1.
• The text explicitly argues that a right to privacy is meaningless without security against private force, meaning the State must ensure private parties do not violate this right, validating Assumption 2.
• The passage discusses the State's duty to protect privacy from private actors but does not claim that the digital economy itself is incompatible with privacy; it only notes that new digital realities require active state protection.
• Therefore, Assumptions 1 and 2 are valid, while Assumption 3 is not supported by the text.
Why the other options are wrong
- (b) 3 only
- Assumption 3 is invalid because the passage does not state that the digital economy is incompatible with privacy, only that the State must actively protect it.
- (c) 1 and 3
- Assumption 3 is invalid as the passage does not assert an inherent incompatibility between the digital economy and privacy rights.
- (d) 2 only
- Assumption 1 is valid because the State's active role in ensuring rights implies the necessity of institutions to enforce these protections against private parties.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2020, held on 4 October 2020. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.