What is X in the sequence 24, X, 12, 18, 36, 90 ?
- (a) 18
- (b) 12 ✓ UPSC's answer
- (c) 9
- (d) 6
Why the answer is (b)
• The sequence follows a pattern of alternating multiplication by 0.5 and 1.5, or equivalently, multiplying by 3/2 and 1/2 alternately.
• Starting from the third term (12), the next term is 18, which is 12 × 1.5.
• The term after 18 is 36, which is 18 × 2. Wait, let's re-evaluate the pattern from the end or middle.
• Let's look at the ratios: 12 to 18 is ×1.5; 18 to 36 is ×2; 36 to 90 is ×2.5. This suggests an increasing multiplier pattern: ×1.5, ×2, ×2.5.
• If the pattern of multipliers is increasing by 0.5 each step (×1.5, ×2, ×2.5), then the step before ×1.5 (from X to 12) should be ×1.0? No, that doesn't fit the start.
• Let's try another common pattern: Multiplication by 1.5, then 2, then 2.5, then 3? No.
• Let's look at the differences or a different multiplicative logic.
• Consider the pattern: ×1.5, ×2, ×2.5, ×3.
• If 36 × 2.5 = 90, then 18 × 2 = 36, then 12 × 1.5 = 18.
• Following this backward, the step before 12 (i.e., X to 12) should follow the previous multiplier in the sequence. The multipliers are 1.5, 2, 2.5. The previous one would be 1.0? If X × 1.0 = 12, X=12. But 24 to 12 is ×0.5.
• Let's re-examine: 24, X, 12, 18, 36, 90.
• Ratios: 12/18 = 2/3? No. 18/12 = 1.5. 36/18 = 2. 90/36 = 2.5.
• The multipliers are 1.5, 2, 2.5. The difference is 0.5.
• So the multiplier before 1.5 should be 1.0. Thus, X × 1.0 = 12? No, the sequence is X -> 12. So 12 / X = 1.0? Then X=12.
• Let's check the first step: 24 -> X. If the multiplier pattern is 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5?
• 24 × 0.5 = 12 (This would make X=12, but the next term is 12, so X would be 12? No, the sequence is 24, X, 12. If 24×0.5=12, then X is missing or the pattern is different).
• Let's try: 24 × 0.5 = 12. But the term is X.
• Let's look at the options. If X=12, sequence is 24, 12, 12, 18, 36, 90. Ratios: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5. This is a perfect arithmetic progression of multipliers: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5.
• Therefore, 24 × 0.5 = 12 (X), 12 × 1.0 = 12, 12 × 1.5 = 18, 18 × 2.0 = 36, 36 × 2.5 = 90.
• The pattern holds perfectly with multipliers increasing by 0.5 each step.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) 18
- If X were 18, the multiplier from 24 to 18 would be 0.75, which does not fit the arithmetic progression of multipliers (0.5, 1.0, 1.5...) established by the rest of the sequence.
- (c) 9
- If X were 9, the multiplier from 24 to 9 would be 0.375, which breaks the consistent 0.5 increment pattern in the multipliers.
- (d) 6
- If X were 6, the multiplier from 24 to 6 would be 0.25, which is inconsistent with the subsequent multipliers of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2025, held on 25 May 2025. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.