Which of the following conclusions is/are valid? 1. Only a serious offence as categorised by the revised JJ Act, justifies the transfer of a case to the adult judicial system. 2. The JJ Act, 2021, categorises an offence as a serious offence based on the maximum sentence it carries, rather than on the minimum sentence. Select the answer using the code given below.
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Why the answer is (b)
• Conclusion 1 is not valid: under the JJ Act it is a heinous offence that allows trying a juvenile as an adult; the passage says activists think a serious offence does NOT merit transfer.
• Conclusion 2 is valid: the 2021 amendment defines a serious offence as one with no minimum sentence but a maximum of seven years or more, i.e. by its maximum sentence.
• Hence 2 only: (b).
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) 1 only
- Conclusion 1 reverses the passage: heinous, not serious, offences allow transfer.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Conclusion 1 is not valid.
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
- Conclusion 2 is stated in the passage.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2026, held on 24 May 2026. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.