With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made : 1. Higher economic growth is essential to ensure reduction in economic disparity. 2. Environmental degradation is sometimes a consequence of economic growth. Which of the above is/are valid assumption/assumptions ?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Why the answer is (b)
• The passage explicitly states that an unbalanced emphasis on growth is often associated with negative environmental consequences, which directly supports Assumption 2.
• The passage argues that focusing exclusively on economic growth is problematic and that growth is often elusive, rather than stating it is essential for reducing disparity.
• It highlights that unbalanced growth leads to adverse distributional effects, implying that growth alone does not ensure a reduction in economic disparity.
• Therefore, Assumption 1 is not valid as the passage suggests growth is not the sole or essential driver for reducing disparity, while Assumption 2 is valid based on the text's mention of environmental consequences.
• Consequently, only Assumption 2 is valid, making option (b) the correct answer.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) 1 only
- Assumption 1 is invalid because the passage states that unbalanced growth leads to adverse distributional effects, not that it is essential for reducing disparity.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Assumption 1 is invalid as the passage does not claim economic growth is essential for reducing economic disparity, only that unbalanced growth has adverse distributional effects.
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
- Assumption 2 is valid because the passage explicitly links unbalanced emphasis on growth with negative environmental consequences.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2015, held on 23 August 2015. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.