With reference to the passage, following assumptions have been made : 1. Some climate-energy models suggest that the use of biomass as a fuel for power generation helps in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions 2. It is not possible to use biomass as a fuel for power generation without disrupting food and forest resources Which of these assumptions is/are valid ?
- (a) 1 only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Why the answer is (a)
• Assumption 1 is valid because the passage states that biomass has the 'highest mitigation potential of all renewable sources' and that second-generation biofuels 'emit low levels of greenhouse gases,' implying that models projecting its use assume it helps mitigate emissions.
• Assumption 2 is invalid because the passage explicitly defines the 'maximum sustainable technical potential' as the range 'without disruption of food and forest resources,' indicating that such use is possible if managed within these limits.
• The passage notes that energy crops 'if not managed properly' compete with food, which implies that proper management allows for use without disruption, contradicting the absolute claim in Assumption 2.
• Therefore, only Assumption 1 is supported by the text, leading to option (a).
Why the other options are wrong
- (b) 2 only
- Assumption 2 is invalid because the passage specifies a sustainable technical potential that exists without disrupting food and forest resources.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Assumption 2 is invalid because the passage confirms that biomass can be used sustainably without disrupting food and forest resources.
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
- Assumption 1 is valid because the passage identifies biomass as having the highest mitigation potential for greenhouse gas emissions.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2016, held on 7 August 2016. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.