Based on the above passage, the following assumptions have been made : 1. Growing enough food for future generations will be a challenge. 2. Corporate farming is a viable option for food security in poor countries. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
- (a) 1 only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Why the answer is (a)
• The passage states that staple crop productivity has reached a plateau and suitable unfarmed land is scarce, implying that meeting future food demands will be difficult.
• It further notes that rising global temperatures may render some areas unsuitable for farming, reinforcing the challenge of growing enough food for future generations.
• Therefore, Assumption 1 is valid as it logically follows from the constraints on yield and land availability described in the text.
• The passage explicitly advocates for extending best practices to smallholders and subsistence farmers, not for corporate farming.
• Since the text focuses on adapting technology for small-scale farmers rather than promoting corporate models, Assumption 2 is not supported.
• Consequently, only Assumption 1 is valid, making option (a) the correct answer.
Why the other options are wrong
- (b) 2 only
- The passage does not suggest corporate farming is a viable option; instead, it emphasizes adapting techniques for smallholders and subsistence farmers.
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- Assumption 2 is invalid because the passage focuses on smallholder adaptation rather than corporate farming, so both assumptions cannot be valid.
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
- Assumption 1 is valid because the passage highlights plateauing yields and climate risks, making the challenge of future food security a logical inference.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2022, held on 5 June 2022. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.