According to the author
- (a) not many research results can be of value to an intelligent investigator
- (b) a research result is always valuable to an intelligent investigator
- (c) any research result can be of value to an intelligent investigator ✓ UPSC's answer
- (d) a research result must always be of some value to an intelligent investigator
Why the answer is (c)
• The passage states that scientific research is 'probably never completely valueless.'
• It explicitly mentions that 'there is always a chance that the results may be of value to the investigator of talent.'
• This implies that even if research seems silly or insignificant, it retains the potential to be useful to a talented investigator.
• Therefore, the author argues that any research result holds the possibility of being valuable to such an investigator.
• This aligns with option (c), which states that any research result can be of value to an intelligent investigator.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) not many research results can be of value to an intelligent investigator
- The passage argues that there is always a chance of value, contradicting the claim that not many results can be of value.
- (b) a research result is always valuable to an intelligent investigator
- The text uses the phrase 'there is always a chance,' indicating possibility rather than the absolute certainty that a result is always valuable.
- (d) a research result must always be of some value to an intelligent investigator
- The word 'must' implies a necessity or guarantee, whereas the passage only suggests a probability or chance of value.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2022, held on 5 June 2022. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.