With reference to above passage, the following assumptions have been made : I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income. II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid ?
- (a) I only
- (b) II only
- (c) Both I and II
- (d) Neither I nor II ✓ UPSC's answer
Why the answer is (d)
• The passage states that in developing countries, commercial exploitation of ecosystems has the potential to boost national income, which directly contradicts Assumption I that no country needs to depend on ecosystems for this purpose.
• The passage highlights the conflict between conservation, livelihoods, and commercial exploitation, particularly in developing countries, but it does not mention resource-rich countries or the obligation to share resources with resource-scarce countries.
• Assumption II introduces a concept of international resource sharing that is not supported by any statement in the provided text.
• Since Assumption I is contradicted by the text and Assumption II is not mentioned or implied, neither assumption is valid based strictly on the passage.
• Therefore, the correct option is (d) Neither I nor II.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) I only
- Assumption I is invalid because the passage explicitly states that commercial exploitation can boost national income in developing countries.
- (b) II only
- Assumption II is invalid because the passage does not discuss resource-rich countries or the sharing of resources between nations.
- (c) Both I and II
- Both assumptions are invalid; Assumption I is contradicted by the text, and Assumption II is not supported by the passage.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2025, held on 25 May 2025. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.