With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made : I. Automobile factories are examples of the circular economy. II. Economic growth is compatible with circular use of mineral resources. Which of the above assumptions is/are valid ?
- (a) I only
- (b) II only ✓ UPSC's answer
- (c) Both I and II
- (d) Neither I nor II
Why the answer is (b)
• The passage states that raw material consumption has quadrupled in 50 years, indicating that economic growth has occurred alongside increased resource use.
• It argues that reusing materials, such as recovering lithium and cobalt from old batteries, makes sense to mitigate supply chain risks and environmental issues.
• This implies that economic activity (growth) can continue while adopting circular practices (reusing mineral resources), validating Assumption II.
• Assumption I is invalid because the passage describes a specific process of sending end-of-life batteries back to factories for recovery, which is a circular practice, but it does not state that all automobile factories are examples of a circular economy.
• Therefore, only Assumption II is valid, making option (b) the correct answer.
Why the other options are wrong
- (a) I only
- Assumption I is not supported as the passage does not claim that automobile factories in general are examples of the circular economy.
- (c) Both I and II
- Assumption I is invalid, so both assumptions cannot be valid.
- (d) Neither I nor II
- Assumption II is valid as the passage supports the compatibility of economic activity with circular resource use.
Asked in the CSAT Paper II of the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2025, held on 25 May 2025. Question and answer key: Union Public Service Commission. Explanation: UPSC Answer Check.