Explain the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Strike vs. Lockout 10 (b) Performance Management 10 (c) Philosophy…

Explain the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Strike vs. Lockout 10 (b) Performance Management 10 (c) Philosophy of Workers' Participation in Management 10 (d) Scope of Industrial Relations 10 (e) Labour Absenteeism 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक को लगभग 150 शब्दों में स्पष्ट कीजिए : 10×5=50 (a) हड़ताल बनाम तालाबंदी 10 (b) निष्पादन प्रबन्ध 10 (c) प्रबन्ध में कामगारों की सहभागिता का दर्शन 10 (d) औद्योगिक संबंध का क्षेत्र 10 (e) श्रम अनुपस्थिति 10

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 Commerce & Accountancy questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires clear exposition of concepts with causes, features, and implications. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words each), spending roughly equal time since all carry 10 marks. Structure each part with: brief definition → distinguishing features/elements → significance or contemporary relevance. No single conclusion needed; each sub-part should end with a crisp closing observation.

Key points expected

(a) Strike vs. Lockout: Definition per Industrial Disputes Act 1947; distinction based on initiation (workers vs. employer), purpose (raising vs. resisting demands), legality conditions (Section 22/23 for strikes, Section 22 for lockouts)
(b) Performance Management: Meaning as continuous process; key components (goal setting, feedback, appraisal, development); distinction from annual performance appraisal; strategic linkage to organizational objectives
(c) Philosophy of Workers' Participation in Management: Democratic, humanistic, and economic rationale; Gandhian trusteeship influence; ILO conventions on participation; levels (shop floor to board level)
(d) Scope of Industrial Relations: Multi-dimensional coverage—employer-employee relations, trade unions, collective bargaining, grievance handling, industrial disputes, government role; emerging dimensions like gig economy relations
(e) Labour Absenteeism: Definition; types (authorized/unauthorized, habitual/casual); causes (personal, social, organizational); measurement methods (absence rate, frequency rate); remedial measures

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	For (a), explains distinction through legal definitions and mutual exclusivity; for (b), establishes performance management as process-oriented vs. event-based appraisal; for (c), traces philosophical evolution from Taylorism to human relations; for (d), covers both traditional and emerging scope; for (e), moves beyond definition to systemic analysis	Provides basic definitions for all parts but treats (b) as synonymous with performance appraisal, misses Gandhian influence in (c), and lists causes in (e) without categorization	Describes only one aspect per part, confuses strike/lockout initiation, or substitutes (b) with general HR concepts without addressing management philosophy
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	Cites correct IDA sections (22, 23, 24) for (a); names specific PM models (Balanced Scorecard, 360-degree) for (b); references specific ILO conventions (C113, C135) and Indian schemes (JRC, WPM Bill) for (c); includes post-2020 labour codes impact for (d); uses correct absenteeism formulas for (e)	Generally accurate but vague on legal sections, mentions WPM without specific schemes, and states absenteeism formulas incorrectly or omits them	Major factual errors like reversing strike/lockout definitions, confusing WPM with collective bargaining, or treating industrial relations as limited to dispute settlement
Structure & flow	20%	10	Each of five parts follows parallel structure: precise definition → 2-3 distinguishing dimensions → significance/contemporary relevance; clear visual separation between parts; maintains 140-160 word discipline per part with no overlap	All parts attempted with some internal structure, but uneven length distribution (some parts 100 words, others 200); occasional repetition across parts	Rambling narrative without part demarcation, or severely imbalanced (3 parts detailed, 2 parts barely 50 words); no logical progression within individual parts
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	For (a), cites T.K. Rangarajan vs. Govt. of T.N. (2003) on right to strike; for (b), references TCS/Infosys performance management systems; for (c), mentions BHEL or SAIL participation models; for (d), cites recent Maruti Suzuki or Wistron labour unrest; for (e), quotes Annual Survey of Industries absenteeism rates or Bihar/Tamil Nadu contrasts	Generic references like 'many IT companies' for (b) or 'public sector' for (c) without specificity; no case law for (a); no data for (e)	No examples across any part, or irrelevant examples (unrelated labour laws, foreign companies without Indian context)
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Each part ends with forward-looking observation: (a) on balancing rights with essential services; (b) on AI-driven continuous feedback replacing annual cycles; (c) on WPM under new labour codes; (d) on platform economy challenging traditional IR frameworks; (e) on post-pandemic hybrid work and absenteeism measurement	Some parts have weak closing statements; others trail off without synthesis; limited contemporary relevance	No concluding element in any part; purely descriptive without analytical connection to current labour market transformations or code reforms

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →