Paper II — Q8
(a) "Trade unions are an impediment to the growth of industry." Do you agree ? Critically evaluate the role of trade unions in…
"Trade unions are an impediment to the growth of industry." Do you agree ? Critically evaluate the role of trade unions in the present context. 20 marks
"Industrial conflict is basically a struggle between management and workers." Examine this statement. 10 marks
What is the importance of industrial relations ? Explain how Industrial Relations (IR) can be enhanced in organisations. 20 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
"उद्योग के विकास में श्रम संघ एक बाधा है ।" क्या आप सहमत हैं ? वर्तमान संदर्भ में श्रम संघों की भूमिका का आलोचनात्मक मूल्यांकन कीजिए । 20
"औद्योगिक टकराव प्रबंध एवं श्रमिकों के मध्य मूलतः एक संघर्ष है ।" इस कथन का परीक्षण कीजिए । 10
औद्योगिक संबंध का क्या महत्व है ? समझाइए कि संगठन में औद्योगिक संबंध (आई.आर.) को किस प्रकार बढ़ाया जा सकता है । 20
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Trade unions and the growth of industry
The statement is only partly true. Unions are workers' organisations formed to protect and advance their interests, and the right to form them is protected by Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution. Whether they hinder growth depends on how they function.
The case that they are an impediment:
- Strikes, go-slows and gheraos cause loss of production, and the 1982 Bombay textile strike is cited for the damage it did to the city's mills and workers.
- Rigid demands on wages, staffing and retrenchment can raise costs and reduce flexibility and investment.
- Rivalry between unions and political affiliations can turn bargaining into a power struggle, as in cases of violence such as the 2012 Manesar unrest.
The case against that view:
- Unions secured minimum wages, safe conditions, social security and limits on working hours, and they give workers a voice in a system of unequal bargaining power.
- Collective bargaining usually produces stable, long-term settlements, and a satisfied workforce is more productive, with a lower turnover.
- Unions help in skill development, discipline, and the introduction of change when management consults them.
The present context: unionisation covers a small share of the workforce, which is largely informal. Globalisation and contract work have weakened bargaining power, and new forms of work (gig and platform work) now fall within social security coverage under the labour codes. The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (in force from 21.11.2025) gives the recognition of a sole negotiating union (with majority support), a 60-day notice for strikes in all establishments and a more formal path for disputes. The courts have held that there is no fundamental right to strike (T.K. Rangarajan, 2003).
Overall, unions are not inherently an impediment. They are most useful when they are responsible, democratic and independent of party politics, and where management bargains in good faith.
(b) "Industrial conflict is basically a struggle between management and workers"
Industrial conflict is the opposition of interests and the disagreements that arise in employment, shown in strikes, lockouts, go-slows, gheraos, absenteeism and sabotage. A conflict is the underlying clash, whereas a dispute is its formal expression, which is subject to the law.
The statement has some truth. The conflict arises from the pay-profit trade-off, job security, working conditions, authority and victimisation, where interests of capital and labour differ, and a radical view (Marx) sees it as built into the system.
But it is not only that. Conflict also arises from:
- rivalry between unions and the interference of politicians or outsiders;
- government policy and the economy (recession, inflation);
- personal factors, such as poor supervision, and community or caste tensions;
- poor communication and the lack of grievance redressal.
The unitary view treats conflict as a deviation caused by poor management or agitators; the pluralist view (Fox, Flanders) treats it as a normal outcome of different interests which can be managed through bargaining. Industrial relations also has a co-operative side, as shown by shared interests in the firm's survival.
Conflict is resolved through grievance procedures, collective bargaining, conciliation, mediation, arbitration and adjudication. So the statement is true in its core but incomplete.
(c) Importance of industrial relations and how to enhance it in organisations
Industrial relations (IR) are the relationships between management, workers and their unions, and the state, in the workplace.
Importance:
- Industrial peace and uninterrupted production, as fewer disputes mean fewer losses.
- Higher productivity and quality, as co-operation and morale go up.
- Protection of workers' rights and welfare, and a fair share in prosperity.
- Lower turnover, absenteeism and legal cost, and a better image for the firm.
- Support for economic development and for an investment climate.
Measures to enhance IR in organisations:
- A fair and clear HR policy on pay, promotion, discipline and working conditions, and prompt, transparent grievance redressal.
- Open two-way communication and consultation with workers and unions.
- Recognition of a representative union and good-faith collective bargaining, with settlements honoured.
- Workers' participation in management through works committees and joint councils.
- Welfare measures, training and career growth, and training of managers and union leaders in IR skills.
- Fair and consistent discipline and a code of conduct accepted by both sides.
- Prompt use of conciliation and adjudication when disputes arise, and compliance with labour laws (the Industrial Relations Code, 2020).
- A culture of trust, in which management shares information and gains.
Firms with good IR, such as Tata Steel with its history of joint consultation, show that peace and productivity can go together.
How this answer will be evaluated
What earns full marks: Comprehensive, balanced, and well-structured answers with specific examples and references.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Balanced assessment of trade unions as impediments vs. facilitators of industrial growth. 20 marks
critically evaluate— positives → negatives/limits → conditions/safeguards → conclusion
Must cover
- Arguments supporting the 'impediment' view (e.g., strikes, rigidity)
- Arguments refuting the view (e.g., stability, skill development)
- Role of unions in the present context (e.g., globalisation, gig economy)
- Balanced conclusion on the net impact
Loses marks
- One-sided argument without critical evaluation
- Ignoring the 'present context' aspect of the question
- Vague generalizations without specific examples
Earns more
- Reference to specific industrial disputes or data
- Mention of the trade-union provisions (Trade Unions Act, 1926, now in the Industrial Relations Code, 2020)
- Discussion of collective bargaining mechanisms
- Comparison of unionized vs. non-unionized productivity
Extra mark
- Citing a specific Supreme Court judgment on strikes
- Reference to ILO conventions on freedom of association
- (b) Analysis of the nature of industrial conflict as a management-worker struggle. 10 marks
examine— intro → how/why with reasoning → evidence → conclusion
Must cover
- Definition of industrial conflict
- Reasons for conflict (wages, conditions, power)
- Nature of the struggle (zero-sum vs. cooperative)
- Conclusion on the validity of the statement
Loses marks
- Treating conflict as purely negative without nuance
- Failing to address the 'struggle' aspect of the statement
- Lack of specific examples or evidence
Earns more
- Mention of causes like job security or working hours
- Reference to conflict resolution mechanisms
- Distinction between conflict and dispute
- Example of a specific industrial conflict
Extra mark
- Reference to a specific industrial tribunal award
- Citing a sociological theory of conflict
- (c) Importance of IR and specific measures to enhance it in organizations. 20 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Definition and importance of Industrial Relations
- Key factors affecting IR (management, workers, government)
- Specific measures to enhance IR (e.g., communication, welfare)
- Conclusion on the benefits of good IR
Loses marks
- Vague or generic statements about IR
- Failing to provide specific measures for enhancement
- Ignoring the 'organisations' context of the question
Earns more
- Mention of specific IR practices (e.g., grievance redressal)
- Reference to the role of management in IR
- Discussion of the impact of IR on productivity
- Example of a company with good IR practices
Extra mark
- Citing a specific case study of successful IR
- Reference to a specific government policy on IR
What "Critically evaluate" is asking you to do
Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.
Structure that answers it
Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict
Where marks are lost
Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Commerce & Accountancy 2021 Paper II
- Q5 Explain the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) Strike vs. Lockout 10 (b) Per…
- Q6 (a) Describe the importance and types of training. 20 (b) What is a good job description…
- Q7 (a) "Different types of tests are used in the selection of employees." Discuss. 20 (b) Di…
- Q8 (a) "Trade unions are an impediment to the growth of industry." Do you agree ? Critically…