Political Science & IR 2021 Paper I 50 marks Evaluate

Paper I — Q4

(a) Do you think that the Buddhist traditions have lent greater ethical foundation to the ancient Indian political thought? Give…

(a)

Do you think that the Buddhist traditions have lent greater ethical foundation to the ancient Indian political thought? Give your arguments. 20 marks

(b)

Marx's concept of 'alienation' is an essential part of the reality in capitalism. Explain. 15 marks

(c)

"Free and fair deliberation is key to the foundation of democracy." Explain. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

क्या आपके विचार में बौद्ध परंपराओं ने प्राचीन भारतीय राजनीतिक चिंतन को अधिक नैतिक आधार प्रदान किया है? अपने तर्क दीजिए। 20

(b)

मार्क्स के 'अलगाव' की अवधारणा पूंजीवाद की वास्तविकता का एक अनिवार्य भाग है। व्याख्या कीजिए। 15

(c)

"स्वतंत्र एवं निष्पक्ष विमर्श लोकतंत्र की नींव की कुंजी है।" व्याख्या कीजिए। 15

Q4 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Political Science & IR Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Political Science & IR paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Buddhist Ethics and Ancient Indian Political Thought Buddhist traditions gave ancient Indian political thought a distinctive ethical foundation, though their institutional reach was narrower than that of the Brahmanical and statecraft traditions. The Buddha shifted legitimacy from ritual purity and kshatriya dominance to moral conduct. The Aggañña Sutta gives a quasi-contractual origin of kingship: people elect a Mahasammata ("great elect") to keep order in return for a share of grain. The Dasa Raja Dhamma lists ten royal virtues, including charity, integrity, non-anger and non-violence; the Cakkavatti Sihanada Sutta makes relieving poverty the king's duty, since neglect breeds crime; and the Mahaparinibbana Sutta praises the Vajjis' seven conditions of welfare, including frequent assemblies held in concord. After Kalinga, Ashoka's Rock Edict XIII renounced conquest by arms for conquest by Dhamma (dhamma-vijaya), and his Dhamma Mahamatras and edicts on animal welfare and care of subjects show a welfare orientation restrained by ethics. The sangha, with its elected, rule-bound, egalitarian discipline, offered an early model of collective self-governance, and opening monastic life to lower castes and women challenged the Brahmanical hierarchy that tied authority to birth and sacrificial knowledge.

Against this, Kautilya's Arthashastra, composed after the Buddha, is a contrasting tradition built on state interest, revenue, espionage and strategic power. The Buddhist contribution is therefore greater in ethical depth but not in institutions: it produced no constitutional or administrative system comparable to the Arthashastra. Its influence was moral and civilisational, and Ambedkar later drew on it, holding that Indian democracy had roots in the sangha.

(b) Marx's Concept of Alienation Alienation is essential to capitalism because it names the estrangement produced by wage labour and private property. In the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (published in 1932) it has four dimensions. The worker is alienated from the product, which becomes an external commodity owned by the capitalist; from the process, since labour is forced, repetitive activity rather than self-expression; from species-being, as human creative and social capacities shrink to survival; and from fellow workers, who become competitors. Its roots lie in private property and the capitalist division of labour. In Capital, Vol. I (1867), commodity fetishism deepens the diagnosis: relations between producers appear as relations between things, and the extraction of surplus value hides behind the market. Braverman's Labor and Monopoly Capital (1974) extended it to the deskilling of work under scientific management, while Althusser argued that the mature Marx broke with this humanist concept.

The idea remains relevant in India's informal labour markets, where casual workers lack security and bargaining power, and in the gig economy (NITI Aayog estimated about 77 lakh gig workers in 2020–21, rising to 2.35 crore by 2029–30), where platforms extract data and labour while presenting work as flexible. The Code on Social Security, 2020 (in force since November 2025) and Rajasthan's Platform-Based Gig Workers Act (2023) now try to bring such workers into social protection. Alienation thus captures not only low wages but loss of control, meaning and social connection.

(c) Deliberation and Democracy Democratic legitimacy depends not merely on counting votes but on citizens forming preferences through open, equal and reasoned discussion. Habermas's communicative rationality holds that validity claims must be tested in a public sphere where participants can challenge power and offer reasons; the ideal speech situation requires freedom from coercion ("free"), equality of voice ("fair") and inclusion of affected parties. This contrasts with aggregative democracy, which treats preferences as fixed and reduces politics to majority calculation. Rawls's public reason, Joshua Cohen's deliberative procedure, Gutmann and Thompson's reciprocity, publicity and accountability, and Fishkin's deliberative polling develop the ideal, while Iris Marion Young and Chantal Mouffe warn that norms of calm "rational" argument can exclude marginalised voices and suppress legitimate conflict.

In India, the Gram Sabha under the 73rd Amendment is a local forum for plans, budgets and exclusion, and Kerala's People's Plan Campaign (1996), which devolved about a third of plan funds to local bodies, showed deliberation bringing transparency to resource allocation. The Constituent Assembly debates remain the model of deliberative constitution-making, whereas fewer Parliament sittings and fewer bills sent to committees weaken deliberation today. Elite capture, caste and gender hierarchies, linguistic exclusion, the digital divide and social-media misinformation can distort it.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Concept > Theory and theorist > Application > Critique

What earns full marks: Precise theoretical definitions, strong application to the specific context, balanced judgment, and named theorists.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Arguments on whether Buddhist traditions lent greater ethical foundation to ancient Indian political thought. 20 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Define 'Dhamma' and 'Dhammaraja' as political concepts
    • Contrast Buddhist ethics with Vedic or Brahmanical political thought
    • Reference specific Buddhist texts (e.g., Dhammapada, Jataka)
    • Present a balanced judgment on the 'greater' claim

    Loses marks

    • Treating Buddhism purely as a religious ritual
    • Ignoring the 'political' dimension of the question
    • One-sided argument without counter-arguments

    Earns more

    • Mention Ashoka's edicts as political application
    • Cite the Aggañña Sutta, Cakkavatti Sihanada Sutta and Mahaparinibbana Sutta (Vajji conditions)
    • Discuss the concept of 'Ahimsa' in statecraft
    • Compare with Jain or Hindu political ethics

    Extra mark

    • Cite specific verses from the Dhammapada
    • Reference a specific modern scholar's interpretation
  2. (b) Explanation of Marx's concept of 'alienation' as an essential part of capitalist reality. 15 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define 'alienation' (Entfremdung) in Marxist terms
    • Explain the four dimensions of alienation (labour, product, species, others)
    • Link alienation to the 'reality' of capitalism (wage labour)
    • Explain why it is 'essential' to the system

    Loses marks

    • Confusing alienation with general 'unhappiness'
    • Ignoring the specific Marxist definition
    • Failing to link it to the capitalist mode of production

    Earns more

    • Reference 'Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844'
    • Distinguish alienation from 'commodity fetishism'
    • Mention 'surplus value' as the mechanism
    • Reference later Marxist thinkers (e.g., Lukacs, Marcuse)

    Extra mark

    • Cite a specific passage from the 1844 Manuscripts
    • Reference a specific modern critique of alienation
  3. (c) Explanation of why 'free and fair deliberation' is key to the foundation of democracy. 15 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define 'deliberation' in a democratic context
    • Explain the link between deliberation and 'foundation' (legitimacy)
    • Discuss 'free' (absence of coercion) and 'fair' (equality) aspects
    • Explain the role of deliberation in decision-making

    Loses marks

    • Treating deliberation as mere 'voting'
    • Ignoring the 'fair' aspect (equality of voice)
    • Failing to link it to the 'foundation' of democracy

    Earns more

    • Reference 'Deliberative Democracy' theorists (e.g., Habermas, Rawls)
    • Mention 'public sphere' or 'civil society'
    • Discuss the role of 'reason' vs 'force'
    • Reference specific democratic institutions (e.g., Parliament)

    Extra mark

    • Cite a specific work by Habermas (e.g., 'The Structural Transformation')
    • Reference a specific case of failed deliberation
What "Evaluate" is asking you to do

Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion.

Structure that answers it

Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict

Where marks are lost

Presenting both sides and then declining to decide, or delivering a verdict against a standard you never stated, which makes it look arbitrary.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Political Science & IR 2021 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in