(a) 'Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation.' Discuss. (20…

(a) 'Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation.' Discuss. (20 marks) (b) Discuss the 'Sustainable Development Goals' as set by the United Nations. (15 marks) (c) Identify the drivers of India's new interest in Africa. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) 'भारत एवं रूस के मध्य संबंध इतिहास, परस्पर विश्वास एवं पारस्परिक लाभकारी सहयोग पर आधारित हैं।' विवेचना कीजिये । (20 अंक) (b) संयुक्त राष्ट्र के द्वारा निर्धारित 'सतत विकास लक्ष्यों' की विवेचना कीजिये । (15 अंक) (c) अफ्रीका में भारत की नई रुचि के प्रेरकों को चिह्नित कीजिये । (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 Political Science & IR questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' requires a balanced, multi-dimensional exploration of all three parts without taking a rigid argumentative stance. Structure the answer with a brief composite introduction, then three distinct sections addressing (a) India-Russia historical and contemporary cooperation, (b) SDGs with India's implementation context, and (c) drivers of India-Africa engagement, followed by a synthesizing conclusion that connects these themes to India's evolving foreign policy.

Key points expected

Part (a): Soviet-era foundations (1971 Treaty, Afghanistan, technology transfer), post-Cold War adaptation, defence cooperation (S-400, BrahMos, nuclear submarines), energy ties (Kudankulam, Vladivostok-Chennai corridor), and recent tensions (Ukraine war, CAATSA implications)
Part (b): 17 SDGs with focus on SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 7 (Clean Energy), SDG 13 (Climate Action); India's SDG Index performance, localisation through Panchayats, and challenges in SDG financing
Part (c): Energy security (ONGC Videsh acquisitions in Mozambique, Sudan), market access for Indian goods, diaspora linkages, countering China's influence through Asia-Africa Growth Corridor, and UN reform coalition building
Inter-linkages: How Russia's UNSC support aids India's Africa diplomacy, and how SDG cooperation forms soft power bridge to both regions
Contemporary challenges: Sanctions on Russia affecting payment mechanisms, Africa's debt concerns with India, and SDG funding gaps post-COVID

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	15%	7.5	Demonstrates clear grasp that 'discuss' requires exploring multiple facets rather than arguing a single thesis; treats all three parts with appropriate weightage (20:15:15 marks ratio); integrates thematic connections between India-Russia, SDGs, and Africa rather than treating them as isolated silos	Addresses all three parts but treats them mechanically without cross-linkages; minor imbalance in part weightage; directive interpretation is functional but not nuanced	Misreads 'discuss' as 'critically examine' or 'evaluate'; disproportionate attention to one part; ignores the interconnected nature of India's multilateral and bilateral engagements
Content depth & accuracy	30%	15	Precise historical chronology (1971 Treaty, 2000 Declaration, 2010 Strategic Partnership upgrade); accurate SDG targets and India's NITI Aayog SDG Index rankings; specific Africa initiatives (IAFS, EXIM Bank LOCs, Pan-African e-Network); correct identification of institutional mechanisms (IRIGC-TEC, UN HLPF, AfCFTA)	Broadly accurate but lacks specificity in dates and institutional names; generic treatment of SDGs without target-level detail; Africa drivers mentioned without policy instrument specificity	Factual errors (confusing BRICS with bilateral Russia ties, misstating SDG numbers, conflating Africa with West Asia); outdated information (pre-2014 Russia framework); significant gaps in any one part
Structure & flow	20%	10	Clear tripartite division with visible sub-headings; smooth transitions between historical roots and contemporary challenges in Part (a), between global framework and Indian implementation in Part (b), and between economic and strategic drivers in Part (c); integrated conclusion that elevates beyond sum of parts	Recognizable structure but uneven transitions; parts identifiable but lack internal coherence; conclusion merely summarizes without synthesis	No discernible structure or paragraph organization; parts bleed into each other; missing introduction or conclusion; bullet-point dumping without narrative flow
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	Specific data: India-Russia trade figures ($35-40 billion target, actual ~$45 billion 2022), S-400 deal value ($5.43 billion); SDG 6.1 (safe drinking water) India coverage 56% (2020); Africa: $12.3 billion EXIM Bank LOCs, 194 e-Network nodes; recent IAFS-IV (2020) commitments; UNGA Resolution 70/1 (2015) citation	Some quantitative backing but figures are approximate or outdated; examples are generic (mentions 'energy cooperation' without Kudankulam specifics; 'education goals' without SSA linkage)	Virtually no data or examples; relies entirely on assertion; no institutional names, treaty references, or contemporary initiatives cited
Conclusion & analytical edge	15%	7.5	Synthesizes how India-Russia partnership provides UNSC cover for Africa expansion, how SDG diplomacy legitimizes both relationships, and identifies the central tension: balancing Russia ties with Quad alignment while using Africa to claim Global South leadership; offers forward-looking policy suggestion (Rupee-Rouble trade expansion, SDG bond instruments, triangular cooperation Russia-India-Africa)	Competent summary of main points without synthesis; identifies one broad trend (multipolarity) without specific mechanism; conclusion is present but adds no analytical value	No conclusion or abrupt ending; purely descriptive close; repeats introduction without development; misses opportunity to address the 'so what' of India's multi-aligned strategy

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →