Paper I — Q2
(a) Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term 'political' with appropriate illustrations. 20 (b) Marxism is a political theory…
(a) Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term 'political' with appropriate illustrations. 20 (b) Marxism is a political theory of action demanding strict compliance with its core principles. Comment. 15 (c) The nature of relationship between equality of democratic citizenship and liberty of citizens is influenced by economic equality. Comment. 15
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) उपयुक्त उदाहरणों सहित 'राजनीतिक' शब्द में निहित अर्थों को स्पष्ट कीजिए। 20 (b) मार्क्सवाद एक क्रिया-आधारित राजनीतिक सिद्धान्त है, जो अपने मूल सिद्धान्तों के सख्त अनुपालन की मांग करता है। टिप्पणी कीजिए। 15 (c) लोकतांत्रिक नागरिकता की समानता और नागरिकों की स्वतंत्रता के बीच संबंध की प्रकृति आर्थिक समानता से प्रभावित होती है। टिप्पणी कीजिए। 15
Directive word: Elucidate
This question asks you to elucidate. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The primary directive is 'elucidate' for part (a), while (b) and (c) require 'comment'—meaning critical, balanced observations with evidence. Allocate approximately 40% of word budget (~400-450 words) to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each (~300-350 words) to parts (b) and (c). Structure: Introduction defining 'political' broadly; body addressing each part sequentially with clear sub-headings; conclusion synthesizing how economic equality mediates the political-liberty nexus across all three parts.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Distinguish between 'political' as activity (politics), sphere (public realm), and relational concept (power, authority, conflict, cooperation)—citing Aristotle's 'political animal', Arendt's 'public realm', and Crick's 'activity by which differing interests are conciliated'
- Part (a): Illustrate with Indian examples—caste as political identity (Rudolph & Rudolph), coalition politics as conciliation of interests, or federalism as territorial conciliation
- Part (b): Analyze Marxism as theory of praxis—dialectical materialism, class struggle, and revolutionary action; discuss 'strict compliance' through Leninist vanguardism and democratic centralism
- Part (b): Critically comment on tensions—Gramsci's cultural hegemony as flexible praxis vs. Stalinist dogmatism; or contemporary adaptations in Kerala model/CPI(M) parliamentary participation
- Part (c): Examine the triadic relationship—formal equality (civil-political rights) vs. substantive equality (social-economic); Rawls' difference principle vs. Nozick's libertarian critique; Indian Constitution's balance via Directive Principles and fundamental rights
- Part (c): Illustrate with Indian evidence—land reforms and Panchayati Raj (equality enabling liberty), or unequal citizenship despite formal equality (informal sector workers' constrained liberty)
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand-directive understanding | 20% | 10 | For (a), unpacks 'elucidate' by revealing layered meanings of 'political' (activity, sphere, relational); for (b) and (c), 'comment' is executed as balanced critical analysis with evidence, not mere description or one-sided advocacy | Addresses directives literally—describes meanings for (a), describes Marxism for (b), describes relationship for (c)—without the analytical depth or critical balance implied by 'elucidate' and 'comment' | Misreads directives—treats 'elucidate' as simple definition, 'comment' as opinion without evidence; or confuses part requirements (e.g., evaluates when asked to comment) |
| Content depth & accuracy | 20% | 10 | Demonstrates command across all three theoretical domains: political concept analysis (Aristotle, Arendt, Wolin, Crick); Marxist theory (base-superstructure, praxis, vanguardism, neo-Marxism); and equality-liberty debates (Rawls, Dworkin, Nozick, Indian constitutional philosophy)—with accurate attribution and no conceptual conflation | Covers familiar terrain adequately—Aristotle's definition, Marx's class struggle, formal vs. substantive equality—but with gaps in theoretical nuance (e.g., misses Arendt's distinction between social and political, or Gramsci's hegemony) | Superficial or inaccurate treatment—conflates 'political' with 'politics', reduces Marxism to economic determinism without praxis dimension, or treats equality and liberty as simply opposed without mediating role of economic equality |
| Structure & flow | 20% | 10 | Clear tripartite organization with explicit markers; internal progression within each part—(a) moves from definitional to institutional to critical; (b) presents thesis-antithesis-synthesis on 'strict compliance'; (c) establishes causal chain from economic equality to citizenship equality to liberty; seamless transitions between parts showing thematic unity | Three distinct sections present but unevenly developed—(a) may be overextended, (b) and (c) compressed; or internal organization within parts is list-like rather than argumentative; transitions between parts are abrupt | Poorly demarcated parts or merged responses; no discernible internal structure within parts; significant imbalance (e.g., 70% on (a), perfunctory (b) and (c)); or answers parts in wrong sequence |
| Examples / case-law / data | 20% | 10 | Rich, specific illustrations across all parts: for (a)—Rudolphs' 'caste as modernizing agent', India's coalition era (1996-2014), or NREGA as politicization of social policy; for (b)—Lenin's What is to be Done?, Kerala's land reform as praxis, or Althusser's 'overdetermination'; for (c)—Supreme Court judgments on right to work (Unni Krishnan), MNREGA's impact on participatory democracy, or comparative Gini coefficients with liberty indices | Some relevant examples but limited specificity—mentions 'Indian politics' or 'Marxist revolution' without concrete reference; or examples cluster in one part (typically (a)) with others under-illustrated; no case law or empirical data in (c) | Generic or absent illustrations—'politics happens everywhere', 'Marxism led to USSR', 'poor people have less freedom' without grounding; or examples are factually wrong or irrelevant to the specific theoretical point |
| Conclusion & analytical edge | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes across all three parts: shows how understanding 'political' as conciliation (Crick) illuminates Marxism's action-theory dilemma (praxis vs. dogma) and why economic equality is precondition for meaningful democratic citizenship—possibly advancing original thesis on 'political economy of liberty' or critiquing liberal-republican binary through Indian constitutional experience | Summarizes each part separately without cross-part synthesis; or offers generic conclusion on 'importance of equality' or 'relevance of Marxism' without integrating the specific theoretical tensions raised; no distinctive analytical contribution | Absent or perfunctory conclusion; or conclusion contradicts body (e.g., suddenly rejecting Marxism after balanced analysis); purely descriptive ending with no forward-looking or integrative insight |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Political Science & IR 2024 Paper I
- Q1 Write approximately 150 words on each one of the following : 10×5=50 (a) Behavioural appr…
- Q2 (a) Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term 'political' with appropriate illustration…
- Q3 (a) The debate on human rights is caught between the limitations of both universalism and…
- Q4 (a) Legitimacy adds positive value to political authority and obligation. Discuss. 20 (b)…
- Q5 Write approximately 150 words on each one of the following : 10×5=50 (a) Constitutional m…