Paper I — Q1
Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Briefly explain the significance of Accounting Standard-3 (AS-3)…
Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Briefly explain the significance of Accounting Standard-3 (AS-3). (10 marks) (b) Discuss the importance of Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP). (10 marks) (c) What are sunk cost and opportunity cost? Explain with example. (10 marks) (d) What is the relationship between residential status and incidence of tax? (10 marks) (e) Discuss the key aspects in respect of audit of insurance company. (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित प्रश्नों में से प्रत्येक का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : (a) लेखांकन मानक-3 (ए० एस०-3) की महत्ता संक्षेप में स्पष्ट कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) कर्मचारी स्टॉक विकल्प योजना (ई० एस० ओ० पी०) के महत्व की विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक) (c) डूबंत लागत एवं अवसर लागत क्या हैं? उदाहरण सहित समझाइए। (10 अंक) (d) आवासीय स्थिति एवं कर-भार में क्या संबंध है? (10 अंक) (e) बीमा कंपनी की लेखापरीक्षा से संबंधित प्रमुख पहलुओं की विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक)
Directive word: Explain
This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The question demands explanation across five distinct sub-parts, each carrying 10 marks with ~150 words limit. Allocate approximately 30 words/3 minutes per sub-part, treating them as standalone short notes. For (a), focus on AS-3's cash flow utility; (b) requires ESOP's motivational and retention dimensions; (c) needs clear conceptual distinction with numerical illustration; (d) demands section-wise tax incidence linkage; (e) covers IRDAI-mandated audit specifics. No integrated conclusion needed—each part should be self-contained.
Key points expected
- (a) AS-3: Cash flow statement preparation, classification into operating/investing/financing activities, elimination of non-cash items, liquidity assessment capability, and compliance with Companies Act 2013
- (b) ESOP: Alignment of employee-shareholder interests, retention mechanism for talent, SEBI (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations 2014, reduced cash compensation burden, and wealth creation for employees
- (c) Sunk vs Opportunity Cost: Sunk cost as irrecoverable past expenditure (e.g., R&D spent on failed drug); opportunity cost as value of next best alternative foregone (e.g., rental income sacrificed for self-use of property)
- (d) Residential Status & Tax Incidence: Section 6 of Income Tax Act 1961—ROR (global income taxable), RNOR (Indian income + foreign income from business/profession controlled from India), NR (Indian income only)
- (e) Insurance Audit: IRDAI audit requirements, valuation of technical reserves (unexpired risk, outstanding claims), solvency margin verification, reinsurance arrangements, and compliance with Insurance Act 1938
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand-directive understanding | 20% | 10 | Correctly interprets 'explain' for (a), (c), (d); 'discuss' for (b), (e)—provides significance/importance where asked, not mere definition; balances descriptive depth with analytical relevance across all five parts | Treats all directives uniformly as 'explain'; provides definitions without addressing 'significance' or 'importance' where specifically demanded; minor misalignment in (b) and (e) | Misreads directives—describes when significance/importance asked; writes generic notes without directive-specific treatment; conflates 'discuss' with 'enumerate' |
| Content depth & accuracy | 20% | 10 | Precise coverage: AS-3's three activity classifications with purpose; ESOP's SEBI regulatory framework; sunk/opportunity cost distinction with mathematical clarity; Section 6's three residential categories with exact income tax incidence; IRDAI's specific reserve valuation and solvency norms | Broadly accurate but lacks specificity—mentions 'cash flow' without activity classification; ESOP without SEBI reference; residential status without Section 6 citation; insurance audit without reserve types | Factually incorrect or outdated content—AS-3 confused with AS-4; ESOP described as only 'free shares'; residential status conflated with citizenship; insurance audit generic without IRDAI context |
| Structure & flow | 20% | 10 | Five clearly demarcated sub-parts with (a)-(e) labelling; each part has mini-structure—definition → core content → significance/linkage; consistent internal logic; optimal word economy without fragmentation | Sub-parts identifiable but uneven treatment—some parts over-expanded, others under-developed; missing labels or poor demarcation; readable but lacks crisp organization | Unlabelled or merged parts; rambling narrative without paragraph breaks; severe imbalance—one part consumes 80+ words, others 20-30; illegible or chaotic presentation |
| Examples / case-law / data | 20% | 10 | (c) provides concrete numerical example for both costs; (d) cites specific sections (6, 5, 9) and illustrative income scenarios; (e) references IRDAI regulations and specific reserve categories; (a) and (b) include practical application context | Generic or hypothetical examples only; mentions 'for example' without specifics; (c) has weak or no numerical illustration; statutory references absent or incorrect | No examples whatsoever; (c) completely lacks illustration; no section numbers cited; examples factually wrong or irrelevant to Indian context |
| Conclusion & analytical edge | 20% | 10 | Each part ends with precise takeaway—AS-3's decision-usefulness, ESOP's corporate governance dimension, cost concepts' decision-relevance, residential planning implications, audit's policyholder protection role; demonstrates inter-linkages where possible | Abrupt endings without synthesis; or generic concluding sentences ('thus we see that...'); no attempt to connect across sub-parts or show broader relevance | Incomplete answers—parts trail off mid-sentence; no concluding element in any sub-part; purely descriptive without any analytical or evaluative comment |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Commerce & Accountancy 2021 Paper I
- Q1 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Briefly explain the significa…
- Q2 X Limited and Y Limited were in the business of telecommunication (telecom). Both the com…
- Q3 (a) Mr. B (49 years), a resident individual, furnishes the following particulars pertaini…
- Q4 (a) ABC company produces tables. An analysis of their accounting reveals— Fixed cost ₹1,0…