General Studies 2023 GS Paper I 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Explain

Q12

What were the major technological changes introduced during the Sultanate period? How did those technological changes influence the Indian society? (Answer in 250 words) 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

सल्तनत काल के दौरान किये गये बड़े तकनीकी बदलाव क्या थे? उन तकनीकी बदलावों ने भारतीय समाज को कैसे प्रभावित किया था? (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires a clear exposition of technological changes followed by their causal impact on society. Structure should comprise: a brief introduction contextualizing the Sultanate period (1206-1526), a bifurcated body addressing technologies first and societal transformations second, and a conclusion assessing long-term implications for medieval Indian economy and culture.

Key points expected

  • Military technologies: Persian wheel (saqiya), siege engines, crossbows, gunpowder artillery (manjaniq, arrada)
  • Agricultural innovations: widespread use of Persian wheel for irrigation, new crops (spinach, watermelon, muskmelon, apricot)
  • Architectural and construction techniques: true arch, dome construction, lime mortar, vaulting (Qutub Minar, Alai Darwaza as exemplars)
  • Paper-making and textile technologies: introduction of paper manufacture, sericulture expansion, cotton ginning
  • Societal impacts: monetization of economy, growth of urban craft guilds (kasbas), changes in land revenue system (iqta), cultural synthesis in Indo-Islamic architecture

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding15%2.25Clearly distinguishes between technological changes (first part) and their societal influence (second part), maintaining analytical balance without conflating the two componentsAddresses both parts but treats them sequentially without establishing clear causal linkages between technology and social changeFocuses predominantly on one part (usually listing technologies) while neglecting societal impact, or conflates both into undifferentiated narrative
Content depth & accuracy25%3.75Demonstrates precise chronological awareness (1206-1526), correctly attributes technologies to Central Asian/Turkish/Persian origins, and accurately identifies their Indian adaptationsCovers major technologies but with some anachronisms (e.g., attributing all to Delhi Sultans without acknowledging pre-existing Indian technologies) or vague generalizationsContains factual errors (e.g., confusing Sultanate with Mughal technologies, misidentifying origins), or relies on outdated historiography ignoring recent scholarship on technology transfer
Structure & flow20%3Employs clear thematic or sectoral organization (military-agricultural-architectural-industrial) with explicit transition markers showing technology→society causation within each sectionPresents information in discernible paragraphs but lacks internal coherence; societal impacts mentioned separately without integrationDisorganized listing without paragraph discipline; abrupt shifts between unrelated technologies; conclusion merely restates points without synthesis
Examples / case-law / data25%3.75Cites specific monuments (Qutub Minar, Tughlaqabad Fort), references Ibn Battuta's observations on Persian wheels, mentions Firuz Shah Tughlaq's canal systems, or uses numismatic evidence for economic monetizationProvides generic references to 'Sultanate architecture' or 'new crops' without specific instances; mentions rulers but not their specific technological patronageNo concrete examples; or uses examples from wrong period (Mughal/Mauryan); confuses Alauddin Khalji's market reforms with technological changes
Conclusion & analytical edge15%2.25Synthesizes by evaluating whether these changes were revolutionary or evolutionary, notes regional variations (Delhi vs provincial Sultanates), or connects to broader historiographical debates (Habib's thesis on technology and surplus extraction)Summarizes main points adequately but offers no analytical evaluation; makes generic statement about 'lasting impact on Indian civilization'Absent or consists of single sentence; introduces new unrelated information; or makes unsupported claims about 'destruction of Indian technology'

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2023 GS Paper I