General Studies 2023 GS Paper I 15 marks 250 words Discuss

GS Paper I — Q20

Discuss the impact of post-liberal economy on ethnic identity and communalism. (Answer in 250 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

संजातीय पहचान एवं सांप्रदायिकता पर उत्तर-उदारवादी अर्थव्यवस्था के प्रभाव की विवेचना कीजिए। (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Q20 of the 2023 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 General Studies paper

Read this question and its model answer in Hindi →

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

The 1991 economic liberalization accelerated India’s integration into global markets, simultaneously reshaping the contours of ethnic identity and communal relations through uneven growth, resource competition, and spatial reorganization.

Resource Competition and Regional Mobilization Liberalization intensified market-driven resource extraction, triggering ethnic mobilization in resource-rich tribal belts like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh against displacement and environmental degradation in industrial corridors. Simultaneously, widening inter-state disparities ethnicized economic aspirations, consolidating regional sub-nationalism through parties like the DMK and AIADMK in Tamil Nadu, TMC in West Bengal, and BJD in Odisha, which framed federal fiscal autonomy as central to regional identity.

Economically-Driven Communalism Post-reform communalism increasingly shifted from traditional religious friction toward economic "othering." Scholars such as Ashutosh Varshney argue that weakened inter-community civic ties in fast-changing cities made places like Ahmedabad more riot-prone, as seen in 2002. Similarly, disputes over cattle trade and beef bans directly weaponized identity against traditional minority livelihoods in the dairy and leather sectors. Furthermore, the Sachar Committee (2006) highlighted the structural economic marginalization of Muslims in the post-liberalization era, fueling defensive political mobilization.

Urbanization, Migration, and Globalization Unregulated market-led urbanization created demographic pressures and ethnic enclaves, triggering nativist backlash against migrants, such as Shiv Sena’s mobilization in Mumbai and political targeting of Bihari labor in Delhi. Globalization also produced a dual cultural effect: diaspora wealth and digital networks bolstered transnational identity politics, such as Khalistani separatist networks abroad and diaspora-funded religious mobilisation, even as a burgeoning cosmopolitan corporate culture diluted traditional caste and ethnic markers among the urban middle class.

Moving forward, preventing economic liberalization from hardening ethnic and communal fault lines requires decentralized industrialization, equitable federal resource sharing, and inclusive social security safety nets to align market growth with constitutional secularism.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: GS1 Society: Continuity, Data, Intersectionality, Solution

What earns full marks: Deep analysis of economic-identity nexus with specific examples and balanced view.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. The answer Analyze the causal link between post-liberal economic shifts and the rise of ethnic/communal identities. 15 marks · 250 words

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Define post-liberal economy (neoliberalism/globalization) context
    • Explain economic marginalization as a driver of identity
    • Link market forces to communalism (e.g., caste/religion)
    • Provide a specific Indian example (e.g., 1992-93 riots)

    Loses marks

    • Narrating history without economic analysis
    • Using emotive language instead of objective terms
    • Ignoring the 'post-liberal' economic context

    Earns more

    • Mention 'identity politics' as a political response
    • Discuss the role of media in amplifying identity
    • Reference specific economic policies (e.g., LPG reforms)
    • Balanced view on economic benefits vs social costs

    Extra mark

    • Cite a specific statistic on unemployment/inequality
    • Name a specific scholar (e.g., Ashutosh Varshney on civic life and communal riots)
What "Discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2023 GS Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in