General Studies 2023 GS Paper I 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Assess

Q15

Identify and discuss the factors responsible for diversity of natural vegetation in India. Assess the significance of wildlife sanctuaries in rain forest regions of India. (Answer in 250 words) 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

भारत में प्राकृतिक वनस्पति की विविधता के लिए उत्तरदायी कारकों को पहचानिए और उनकी विवेचना कीजिए। भारत के वर्षा-वन क्षेत्रों में वन्यजीव अभयारण्यों के महत्व का आकलन कीजिए। (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 General Studies questions

Directive word: Assess

This question asks you to assess. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'assess' requires balanced evaluation of both components: first identifying and discussing factors behind vegetation diversity, then critically weighing the significance of rainforest wildlife sanctuaries. Structure as: brief introduction on India's vegetation diversity → body paragraph on edaphic, climatic, topographic and anthropogenic factors → body paragraph on rainforest sanctuaries with their ecological and conservation significance → conclusion on integrated landscape approach.

Key points expected

Climatic factors: temperature, rainfall variability (monsoon patterns), humidity gradients from tropical to alpine zones
Edaphic and topographic factors: soil types (alluvial, black, red, laterite), altitude variations from sea level to Himalayas
Biogeographic positioning: India's location in Indo-Malayan realm, collision of Gondwanan and Laurasian fauna
Rainforest sanctuary significance: biodiversity hotspots (Western Ghats, Northeast), endemic species protection, watershed functions, carbon sequestration
Critical assessment: limitations like habitat fragmentation, human-wildlife conflict, insufficient buffer zones, need for corridor connectivity
Specific examples: Periyar, Silent Valley, Namdapha, Great Nicobar Biosphere Reserve with their unique species

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	3	Clearly distinguishes between 'discuss' (first part) and 'assess' (second part); provides evaluative judgment on sanctuary effectiveness, not mere description; balances both components proportionally within word limit	Addresses both parts but treats 'assess' descriptively; uneven weightage with heavy focus on vegetation factors and superficial treatment of sanctuary significance	Misses the evaluative demand entirely; writes only on vegetation diversity or only on sanctuaries; confuses 'assess' with 'enumerate'
Content depth & accuracy	20%	3	Precise scientific terminology (endemism, physiognomy, alpha/beta diversity); accurate rainfall ranges for vegetation types; nuanced understanding of sanctuary ecosystem services beyond tourism	Generalized statements about climate and rainfall; basic mention of sanctuary importance without ecosystem service differentiation; minor factual errors in vegetation classification	Confuses vegetation types (e.g., equating tropical evergreen with deciduous); incorrect location of sanctuaries; conflates national parks with wildlife sanctuaries; outdated or wrong data
Structure & flow	20%	3	Seamless transition from vegetation factors to rainforest context; logical progression from physical factors → regional diversity → specific sanctuary assessment; effective signposting within tight word limit	Clear paragraphs but abrupt shift between parts; some repetition between vegetation discussion and rainforest context; adequate but not elegant organization	Disjointed structure with no clear part demarcation; random listing without thematic grouping; conclusion missing or merely restates introduction
Examples / case-law / data	20%	3	Specific sanctuaries with location precision (e.g., Silent Valley in Palakkad district, Kerala); quantitative data on species endemism (e.g., 50% of India's angiosperms in Western Ghats); recent conservation success metrics	Generic mention of Western Ghats and Northeast sanctuaries without naming specific ones; approximate rainfall figures; no quantitative species data	No Indian examples; incorrect sanctuary names; examples from outside rainforest zones (e.g., Ranthambore, Gir); irrelevant international comparisons dominating answer
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	3	Synthesizes vegetation diversity and sanctuary conservation as integrated climate adaptation strategy; proposes specific policy recommendation (e.g., expanding rainforest corridors under Green India Mission); acknowledges trade-offs between tribal rights and conservation	Standard concluding summary of points; generic call for protection; no forward-looking element or critical self-reflection on assessment made	No conclusion or abrupt ending; purely emotional appeal without analytical closure; contradicts earlier assessment without reconciliation

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →