GS Paper II — Q20
"China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has transformed South Asia from a regional space into a theatre of great power…
"China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has transformed South Asia from a regional space into a theatre of great power competition." Analyse the strategic implications of the BRI for India's security and regional influence in South Asia. (Answer in 250 words) 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
“चीन के बेल्ट एंड रोड इनिशिएटिव (BRI) ने दक्षिण एशिया को एक क्षेत्रीय भू-क्षेत्र से बदलकर महाशक्तियों की प्रतिस्पर्धा के रंगमंच में परिवर्तित कर दिया है।” दक्षिण एशिया में भारत की सुरक्षा और क्षेत्रीय प्रभाव पर BRI के रणनीतिक प्रभावों का विश्लेषण कीजिए। (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has altered South Asia's balance of power, turning India’s neighbourhood into an arena of great-power contestation.
Sovereignty and Security Implications The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), BRI's flagship, runs through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, violating India’s territorial integrity; hence India has boycotted the Belt and Road Forum since 2017. BRI also raises 'debt-trap' concerns: Sri Lanka leased Hambantota Port for 99 years to a Chinese state-owned firm in 2017 amid debt distress, creating dual-use naval risks, as the 2022 docking of the Chinese tracking vessel Yuan Wang 5 there showed, though scholars dispute the debt-trap reading. Such port footprints feed fears of a 'String of Pearls' around India.
Erosion of Regional Influence BRI projects in Nepal, Bangladesh and the Maldives have expanded Beijing’s economic and political leverage, offering capital alternatives that let neighbours hedge between New Delhi and Beijing and diluting India’s traditional primacy. Yet BRI has limits: several projects have stalled, and India's roughly $4 billion assistance during Sri Lanka's 2022 crisis showed its first-responder advantage.
India’s Counter-Measures India has reinforced its Neighbourhood First policy and SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region), expanded in 2025 as MAHASAGAR, stressing demand-driven connectivity, capacity-building and disaster relief. Beyond the region it backs Chabahar port, the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), launched at the 2023 G20 Summit.
India should link these with the Quad and the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI), execute projects on time and offer debt-sustainable alternatives across South Asia.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: GS2 International Relations
What earns full marks: Critical analysis of security threats (CPEC) and influence loss with specific counter-strategies.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- The answer Analyse the strategic implications of the BRI for India's security and regional influence in South Asia. 15 marks · 250 words
analyse— intro → causes → effects → stakeholders/linkages → way forward
Must cover
- Threat to sovereignty via CPEC in PoK
- Strategic encirclement through 'String of Pearls'
- Erosion of regional influence via debt-trap diplomacy
- Way forward: India's counter-initiatives (e.g., Chabahar, INSTC, IMEC, SAGAR/MAHASAGAR)
Loses marks
- Reciting BRI facts without strategic analysis
- Ignoring the security dimension (CPEC)
- Failing to link BRI to regional influence
Earns more
- Mention of Chabahar Port as a counter-strategy
- Reference to India's 'Neighbourhood First' policy
- Analysis of 'debt-trap' in Sri Lanka (Hambantota)
- Mention BIMSTEC or sub-regional connectivity (e.g., BBIN) as India's regional counterweight
Extra mark
- Cite Chinese research/tracking vessel visits (e.g., Yuan Wang 5 at Hambantota, 2022) as dual-use evidence
- Note that the debt-trap thesis is contested, or cite India's ~$4 billion aid to Sri Lanka in 2022 as counter-leverage
What "Analyse" is asking you to do
Break the subject into its working parts and show how they act on each other. The marks are in the interconnections — which factor drives which, and what the resulting structure explains — not in the inventory of factors.
Structure that answers it
Define the whole → separate it into its parts → show which part drives which → what that interaction produces → what the structure implies
Where marks are lost
A flat list of causes with no account of which drives which. An answer of neatly separated headings, each self-contained, scores as description.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from General Studies 2026 GS Paper II
- Q17 Can the constitutional mandate of rights-based welfare be effectively realised in the con…
- Q18 Should education be treated primarily as a welfare obligation of the state or as a strate…
- Q19 "India's global diaspora acts as a living bridge, as a critical economic factor and knowl…
- Q20 "China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has transformed South Asia from a regional space…