(a) Does the actual working of Indian federalism conform to the centralizing tendencies in Indian polity? Give reasons for your…

(a) Does the actual working of Indian federalism conform to the centralizing tendencies in Indian polity? Give reasons for your answer. (20 marks) (b) The main goal of the Fundamental Duties in the Indian Constitution is to generate civic responsibility among the citizens. Explain. (15 marks) (c) Dr. Ambedkar's clarion call, "Educate, Agitate and Organize", strategizes the Dalit movement towards achieving civil liberty. Discuss. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) क्या भारतीय संघवाद की वास्तविक कार्यप्रणाली भारतीय राज व्यवस्था में केंद्रीकरण की प्रवृत्ति के अनुरूप है? अपने उत्तर के पक्ष में तर्क दीजिए। (20 अंक) (b) भारतीय संविधान में मूल कर्तव्यों का मुख्य लक्ष्य नागरिकों में नागरिक उत्तरदायित्व उत्पन्न करना है। स्पष्ट कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) डॉ. अंबेडकर का स्पष्ट आह्वान, "शिक्षित हो, आंदोलन करो और संगठित हो", नागरिक स्वतंत्रता प्राप्त करने की दिशा में दलित आंदोलन की रणनीति बनाता है। विवेचन कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Political Science & IR questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' requires a balanced, analytical treatment across all three parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure with a brief composite introduction, then dedicated sections for each sub-part with clear internal headings, followed by an integrated conclusion that ties Ambedkar's vision to contemporary federalism and civic responsibility.

Key points expected

Part (a): Analysis of constitutional provisions enabling centralization (Articles 3, 356, 365, 368) versus federal features; assessment of Sarkaria Commission and Punchhi Commission recommendations on Centre-State relations
Part (a): Empirical evidence of centralizing trends—President's Rule usage (S.R. Bommai case), GST regime, COVID-19 pandemic management, and recent trends toward cooperative federalism
Part (b): Explanation of Article 51A Fundamental Duties inserted by 42nd Amendment (1976); distinction between moral and civic duties; Swaran Singh Committee recommendations
Part (b): Critical evaluation of how duties generate civic responsibility—link to Fundamental Rights balance, Verma Committee Report on implementation, and contemporary relevance (environmental duties, scientific temper)
Part (c): Exegesis of 'Educate, Agitate, Organize' as three-pronged strategy; connection to Annihilation of Caste and Buddha and His Dhamma; role in civil liberty achievement
Part (c): Historical trajectory—formation of Scheduled Castes Federation, conversion to Buddhism (1956), and contemporary Dalit movements (BSP, Dalit Panthers, Rohith Vemula movement) as continuing this strategy

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	Demonstrates precise grasp of 'discuss' across all three parts: for (a) presents balanced argument on federalism-centralization tension without mere description; for (b) critically examines civic responsibility generation rather than listing duties; for (c) treats 'Educate, Agitate, Organize' as dynamic strategy, not static slogan. Shows awareness that part (a) requires 'evaluate,' part (b) requires 'explain,' and part (c) requires 'discuss'—adapting tone accordingly.	Addresses all three parts but treats them descriptively; may conflate 'discuss' with 'describe' or 'list.' Shows basic understanding of directive but lacks analytical adaptation across different implicit demands in each sub-part.	Misinterprets directive—either ignores one or more parts, or treats entire question as single-theme essay. Confuses 'discuss' with 'enumerate' or 'narrate,' producing bullet-point lists without analysis.
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	Displays command of constitutional provisions with accurate citations (Articles 352, 356, 360, 368 for part a; Article 51A clauses for part b; specific Ambedkar texts for part c). Correctly identifies federalism as 'holding together' type (K.C. Wheare/Rajni Kothari). Distinguishes between 42nd and 86th Amendment duties. Accurately dates Ambedkar's slogan to 1940s and connects to specific organizational forms (SCF, ILP).	Covers major points with some constitutional references but may have minor errors (e.g., conflating 42nd and 44th Amendments, misdating Ambedkar's conversion). Identifies centralization trends but lacks theoretical framing. Mentions Fundamental Duties without clause specificity.	Significant factual errors—wrong amendment numbers, incorrect article citations, anachronistic claims about Ambedkar. Superficial treatment: describes federalism as 'strong Centre' without nuance, lists duties without purpose analysis, treats slogan as generic advice.
Structure & flow	20%	10	Clear tripartite structure with explicit headings or transitions between (a), (b), and (c). Within each part: (a) follows thesis-antithesis-synthesis or trend-countertrend-assessment; (b) moves from constitutional insertion to mechanism to critical evaluation; (c) progresses from slogan origins to strategic application to contemporary relevance. Integrated conclusion synthesizing all three themes through Ambedkar's constitutional vision.	Addresses all three parts sequentially but with weak transitions. Internal organization within parts is present but mechanical—may follow chronological or list-based structure without clear analytical progression. Conclusion merely summarizes rather than synthesizes.	No clear demarcation between parts; jumps between themes arbitrarily. Disproportionate allocation—over-emphasizes one part. Lacks introduction or conclusion. Poor paragraphing with run-on arguments.
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	Rich evidentiary base: for (a) cites S.R. Bommai (1994), Coal Bearing Areas Act cases, GST Council functioning, and recent data on Finance Commission devolution; for (b) references Verma Committee (1999), Ranganath Misra Commission on religious freedom, and contemporary instances (Swachh Bharat as duty manifestation); for (c) grounds analysis in specific Ambedkar writings (Annihilation of Caste 1936, The Untouchables 1948) and movement history (Mahad Satyagraha 1927, Kalaram Temple entry 1930).	Includes some case law or examples but unevenly distributed—strong on (a) but weak on (b) and (c), or vice versa. Uses generic examples (President's Rule in Punjab, basic GST mention) without specificity. Mentions Ambedkar but without textual grounding.	Virtually no case law, constitutional articles, or empirical data. Relies on assertion ('Centre is strong') without evidence. No specific Ambedkar texts or movement events. Examples, if present, are irrelevant or incorrect.
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Synthesizes three apparently disparate themes through Ambedkar's constitutional vision: federalism as negotiated accommodation (his role in Drafting Committee), duties as democratic citizenship building (his concern with social democracy), and the slogan as unfinished project. Offers critical forward-looking assessment—e.g., whether competitive federalism undermines cooperative ideals, or how digital agitation transforms 'organize.' Demonstrates independent political judgment.	Separate conclusions for each part without integration. Restates main points without advancing argument. Generic closing statement about Ambedkar's relevance today without specific linkage to question themes.	No conclusion, or abrupt ending. Conclusion contradicts body or introduces entirely new, undeveloped argument. Purely descriptive summary without analytical advancement.

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →