Political Science & IR 2023 Paper I 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Comment

Paper I — Q5

(a) Imprint of the British Constitution on the Indian Constitution (10 marks) (b) Environmentalism of the poor (10 marks) (c)…

Comment on the following in about 150 words each:

(a)

Imprint of the British Constitution on the Indian Constitution 10 marks

(b)

Environmentalism of the poor 10 marks

(c)

Functions of District Planning Committee 10 marks

(d)

Satyagraha and Indian Nationalism 10 marks

(e)

National Commission for Minorities 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक पर लगभग 150 शब्दों में टिप्पणी कीजिए :

(a)

भारतीय संविधान पर ब्रिटिश संविधान की छाप (10 अंक)

(b)

गरीबों का पर्यावरणवाद (10 अंक)

(c)

जिला योजना समिति के कार्य (10 अंक)

(d)

सत्याग्रह और भारतीय राष्ट्रवाद (10 अंक)

(e)

राष्ट्रीय अल्पसंख्यक आयोग (10 अंक)

Q5 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Political Science & IR Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Political Science & IR paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Imprint of the British Constitution on the Indian Constitution

The Indian Constitution bears a foundational imprint of the British Westminster model, largely inherited through the Government of India Act 1935. Core British structural borrowings include the parliamentary cabinet system based on collective responsibility, bicameralism, legislative procedures, the nominal role of the executive head, the Diceyan concept of the Rule of Law, single citizenship, the office of the Speaker, prerogative writs, and the continuity of an apolitical, permanent civil service.

However, India consciously diverged from the core British premise of Parliamentary Sovereignty. Instead, the Constituent Assembly established constitutional supremacy mediated through a written constitution, an entrenched bill of Fundamental Rights, and judicial review. Furthermore, Britain's unitary framework was rejected in favor of an asymmetric federal structure to address India’s vast socio-cultural pluralism. Thus, while the British imprint provided the institutional scaffolding and administrative continuity, indigenous adaptations reoriented these instruments from imperial control toward transformative constitutionalism and egalitarian democracy.

(b) Environmentalism of the Poor

The 'environmentalism of the poor', theorized by Ramachandra Guha and Joan Martinez-Alier (Varieties of Environmentalism, 1997), posits that ecological resistance in the Global South is fundamentally an ecological distribution conflict centered on survival, livelihood, and access to natural resources, sharply distinct from the post-materialist, lifestyle-driven preservationism of the Global North.

In India, grassroots mobilizations demonstrate that subsistence needs drive ecological conservation. The Chipko movement resisted commercial logging to protect local agro-ecological livelihoods; the Narmada Bachao Andolan challenged large-scale displacement and ecological destruction caused by mega-dams; and artisanal fisherfolk struggles have resisted mechanized trawling to defend marine ecosystems and traditional occupations. These movements challenge the dominant extractivist developmental paradigm by linking ecological degradation directly to subaltern marginalization. Ultimately, the environmentalism of the poor reclaims adivasis, peasants, and traditional communities not as environmental degraders, but as primary ecological stewards fighting for distributive environmental justice.

(c) Functions of District Planning Committee

Mandated under Article 243ZD of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, the District Planning Committee (DPC) is the constitutional linchpin for decentralized, bottom-up planning. Its foremost function is to consolidate the separate development plans prepared by Panchayats (under Article 243G) and Municipalities (under Article 243W), formulating a composite draft development plan for the entire district.

The DPC is mandated to address matters of common interest between rural and urban areas, including spatial planning, the integrated sharing of water and natural resources, infrastructural development, and environmental conservation, ensuring equitable distribution of resources across sub-regions before integrating these into the state plan. Unlike the older bureaucratic district development boards, at least four-fifths of a DPC's members are elected by and from the elected members of the district panchayat and the municipalities, in proportion to the district's rural and urban populations. Kerala's district planning during the People's Plan Campaign is the best example of the design working. Despite operational bottlenecks and state reluctance, DPCs remain constitutionally vital for bridging the rural-urban developmental divide.

(d) Satyagraha and Indian Nationalism

Satyagraha, conceptualized by Mahatma Gandhi as moral-political resistance grounded in truth (satya) and non-violence (ahimsa), first tried out against the Transvaal's registration law in South Africa in 1906, fundamentally restructured Indian nationalism from an elite petitioning discourse into an expansive, non-violent mass struggle.

By demanding moral courage and self-sacrifice, Satyagraha democratized anti-colonial mobilization across peasant, working-class, and women's spheres, as seen in Champaran, the Non-Cooperation Movement, and the Salt Satyagraha. It was inextricably tied to the Constructive Programme, which emphasized communal harmony experiments, the eradication of untouchability, and village self-reliance (swadeshi). However, Satyagraha possessed strategic limitations: it sat in sharp tension with revolutionary nationalism, as represented by Bhagat Singh and the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA, 1928), and struggled to reconcile with radical left mobilizations that saw constitutional and non-violent compromises as inadequate for overthrowing imperial capitalism. Nonetheless, Satyagraha established an ethical vocabulary of peaceful resistance that formed the bedrock of India's democratic political culture.

(e) National Commission for Minorities

The National Commission for Minorities (NCM), established under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992, functions as a statutory watchdog to safeguard the rights of the six notified religious minorities (Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Parsis, and - since 2014 - Jains); linguistic minorities fall instead to the Special Officer under Article 350B. It draws institutional purpose from constitutional safeguards under Articles 25-28 on religious freedom and Articles 29 and 30, which protect minority culture, language, and educational institutions.

The NCM is tasked with evaluating minority progress under Union and State development initiatives, monitoring constitutional and legal safeguards, investigating specific grievances regarding discrimination, and recommending corrective policies. However, unlike the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (Article 338) and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (Article 338A), the NCM lacks constitutional status, making its mandate vulnerable to executive discretion. Furthermore, although it has the powers of a civil court when inquiring into complaints, its recommendations are not binding on governments. Transforming the NCM into a constitutional body with binding adjudicatory powers remains essential for robust minority rights protection in India.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: All parts show deep understanding, critical analysis, and balanced judgment.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Context of British influence, arguments for/against, and a judgment on the imprint. 10 marks · 150 words

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Parliamentary (Westminster) system: collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers, nominal head of state (Arts 74, 75, 53)
    • Rule of law (Dicey), single citizenship, writs (Arts 32, 226), bicameralism, office of the Speaker
    • Government of India Act 1935 as the main colonial inheritance: federal scheme, Governor, emergency powers, Public Service Commissions, Federal Court
    • Judgment: adoption was selective and adapted - written constitution, federalism, judicial review and fundamental rights depart from the British model

    Loses marks

    • Listing features without critical analysis
    • Ignoring the 'imprint' aspect

    Earns more

    • Legislative procedure, Question Hour, Speaker's office
    • Differences: parliamentary sovereignty vs constitutional supremacy; written vs unwritten; federal vs unitary
    • Dicey's rule of law refined by Art 14 and Art 21 (Maneka Gandhi)
    • Borrowed vs indigenous: DPSP (Ireland), fundamental rights (USA), emergency (Weimar)

    Extra mark

    • Constituent Assembly debates: Ambedkar and Nehru's Objectives Resolution on the Westminster model
    • Government of India Act 1935 as source of administrative provisions
  2. (b) Context of poor's environmentalism, arguments for/against, and a judgment. 10 marks · 150 words

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Concept: Guha and Martínez-Alier - resource conflicts of the poor who depend directly on nature, contrasted with the 'full-stomach' environmentalism of the affluent (wilderness, conservation)
    • Sources: subsistence dependence on forests, rivers and commons; displacement; Gadgil-Guha's 'omnivores, ecosystem people and ecological refugees'
    • Illustrations: Chipko (1973), Narmada Bachao Andolan, Niyamgiri and Dongria Kondh (2013 Gram Sabhas), fisherfolk movements
    • Judgment: a valuable corrective, but critiques - romanticisation of the poor, neglect of the poor's own environmental harm, links to ecofeminism (Shiva)

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with general environmentalism
    • Ignoring the 'poor' aspect

    Earns more

    • Ramachandra Guha and Joan Martinez-Alier, Varieties of Environmentalism (1997)
    • Vandana Shiva and ecofeminism; women in Chipko
    • Distinction from elite 'full-stomach' and from post-materialist environmentalism (Inglehart)
    • Environmental justice links: Bullard, Global South movements (Ken Saro-Wiwa)

    Extra mark

    • Orissa Mining Corporation v MoEF (Niyamgiri 2013)
    • Forest Rights Act 2006 as legal recognition
  3. (c) Context of DPC, arguments for/against its functions, and a judgment. 10 marks · 150 words

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Constitutional basis: Art 243ZD (74th Amendment 1992) - every State to constitute a DPC at district level
    • Composition: members elected by and from Panchayat and Municipality members in proportion to rural/urban population; at least four-fifths elected; chairperson nominated by the State Government
    • Functions: consolidate plans of Panchayats and Municipalities, prepare the draft development plan for the whole district (spatial planning, sharing of water and resources, infrastructure, environmental conservation), forward to the State Government
    • Judgment: meant for decentralised bottom-up planning; in practice weak or non-functional in many States, dominated by District Collectors, short of funds; Kerala and West Bengal are better examples

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with the 73rd Amendment
    • Listing functions without critical analysis

    Earns more

    • Art 243ZD(3): functions and consultation; Metropolitan Planning Committee under Art 243ZE
    • Twelfth Schedule item 1 (urban planning) and the Eleventh Schedule: the DPC links both
    • Relation with the State Planning Board and NITI Aayog (formerly Planning Commission): district plans feed the State plan
    • Gram Panchayat Development Plan; People's Plan Campaign (Kerala 1996)

    Extra mark

    • Art 243ZD(3): the DPC chairperson forwards the plan to the State Government
    • Planning reform: Second ARC recommendations and NITI Aayog (2015)
  4. (d) Context of Satyagraha, arguments for/against its role, and a judgment. 10 marks · 150 words

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Satyagraha: truth-force; non-violent resistance based on satya, ahimsa and self-suffering (Hind Swaraj 1909; South Africa 1906)
    • Role: mass mobilisation - Champaran (1917), Kheda, Ahmedabad mill strike, Rowlatt Satyagraha (1919), Non-Cooperation, Salt March (1930), Quit India
    • Critiques: Marxist and Ambedkarite critique (limits on caste and class), moral coercion, withdrawal after Chauri Chaura, religious idiom distancing minorities
    • Judgment: turned an elite movement into a mass movement and changed nationalist ethics; global influence (King, Mandela); limited by its own tensions

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with general nationalism
    • Ignoring the 'Satyagraha' aspect

    Earns more

    • Distinction from passive resistance; Gandhi's critique of violence
    • Forms: non-cooperation, civil disobedience, fasting, hartal
    • Global influence: Martin Luther King, Mandela
    • Ambedkar's critique: Poona Pact 1932

    Extra mark

    • Salt March (12 March - 6 April 1930)
    • Gandhi, Hind Swaraj (1909)
  5. (e) Context of NCM, arguments for/against its role, and a judgment. 10 marks · 150 words

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Statutory body under the National Commission for Minorities Act 1992; notified minorities: Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Zoroastrians (1993); Jains added 2014
    • Functions under s.9: evaluate progress of minorities, monitor constitutional and legal safeguards, make recommendations, look into specific complaints, study discrimination, annual reports to Parliament
    • Composition: Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson and five members, all from minority communities
    • Judgment: advisory and recommendatory, no enforcement power, limited resources, vacancies; debate on constitutional status; unlike the constitutional commissions for SCs/STs/OBCs

    Loses marks

    • Confusing NCM with NCSC/NCST (Arts 338/338A) or NHRC
    • Listing functions without critical analysis

    Earns more

    • NCM Act 1992; origin in the Minorities Commission of 1978 (Janata government resolution); statutory status in 1992
    • Related body: National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act 2004 (NCMEI)
    • Sachar Committee 2006 and Ranganath Misra Commission 2007 reports
    • Arts 29-30 and Art 350B: Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities

    Extra mark

    • Contrast with Arts 338 (NCSC), 338A (NCST), 338B (NCBC)
    • T.M.A. Pai (2002) on minority institutions
What "Comment" is asking you to do

Take a position on the statement and support it. Comment usually attaches to a quoted line in the short slots, so the reasoning must be compressed — an opening view, a few load-bearing reasons, and the limit of the claim.

Structure that answers it

Unpack what the statement asserts → your stance → two or three supporting reasons → the qualification that limits it

Where marks are lost

Neutral summary; a comment without a stance has not answered. Equally costly is accepting the quoted line wholesale and never testing where it fails.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Political Science & IR 2023 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in