Comment on the following in about 150 words each: (a) Imprint of the British Constitution on the Indian Constitution (10…

Comment on the following in about 150 words each: (a) Imprint of the British Constitution on the Indian Constitution (10 marks) (b) Environmentalism of the poor (10 marks) (c) Functions of District Planning Committee (10 marks) (d) Satyagraha and Indian Nationalism (10 marks) (e) National Commission for Minorities (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक पर लगभग 150 शब्दों में टिप्पणी कीजिए : (a) भारतीय संविधान पर ब्रिटिश संविधान की छाप (10 अंक) (b) गरीबों का पर्यावरणवाद (10 अंक) (c) जिला योजना समिति के कार्य (10 अंक) (d) सत्याग्रह और भारतीय राष्ट्रवाद (10 अंक) (e) राष्ट्रीय अल्पसंख्यक आयोग (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Political Science & IR questions

Directive word: Comment

This question asks you to comment. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'comment' requires a balanced, analytical response with personal insight rather than mere description. Allocate approximately 30 words/2 minutes per sub-part, ensuring each (a)-(e) receives roughly equal treatment given identical 10-mark weighting. Structure each mini-answer as: brief context (1 line), core analytical points (2-3 lines), and a concluding observation linking to contemporary relevance or broader constitutional/political theory.

Key points expected

(a) British imprint: parliamentary sovereignty, cabinet system, rule of law, bicameralism, and civil service continuity; distinction between borrowed institutions and indigenous adaptations (e.g., written constitution, federalism)
(b) Environmentalism of the poor: Guha and Martinez-Alier's thesis linking livelihood struggles to environmental protection; Chipko, Narmada Bachao Andolan, and fisherfolk movements as cases where subsistence needs drive conservation
(c) DPC functions: consolidation of panchayat and municipality plans (Art 243ZD), resource allocation, spatial planning, equitable area distribution, and integration with state plans; distinction from District Development Councils
(d) Satyagraha and nationalism: Gandhian method as moral-political resistance transforming anti-colonial struggle; mass participation, Hindu-Muslim unity experiments, and constructive program; limitations regarding revolutionary nationalism
(e) NCM: statutory status (1992 Act), constitutional backing through Art 29-30, protection of religious/linguistic minorities, recommendations on minority welfare; distinction from NCSC/NCST and limitations regarding enforceability

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	Interprets 'comment' appropriately across all five parts—offering analytical judgment rather than description; for (a) evaluates selective adaptation thesis, for (b) assesses class-environment nexus, for (c) distinguishes DPC's integrative role, for (d) weighs Satyagraha's contribution critically, for (e) appraises NCM's effectiveness	Provides mostly descriptive content with occasional evaluative phrases; treats 'comment' as synonymous with 'describe' or 'explain'; limited critical engagement with any sub-part	Misreads directive as requiring lengthy narrative or factual listing; no evaluative element in any sub-part; confuses 'comment' with 'enumerate' or 'trace'
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	Demonstrates precise constitutional knowledge: for (a) cites specific borrowed provisions (Govt of India Acts 1919/1935); for (b) accurately deploys Guha-Martinez-Alier framework; for (c) correctly references Art 243ZD; for (d) distinguishes Satyagraha from passive resistance; for (e) notes 1992 Act provisions accurately	Broadly accurate but with gaps or minor errors—e.g., conflates DPC with District Development Council, misdates NCM establishment, or oversimplifies Satyagraha as 'non-violence'	Significant factual errors—e.g., claiming British imprint includes fundamental rights, misidentifying environmentalism of poor as government policy, or treating NCM as constitutional body under original Constitution
Structure & flow	20%	10	Each 30-word segment follows clear micro-structure: context → core argument → link to broader theme; seamless transitions between sub-parts; overall answer shows deliberate sequencing (historical to contemporary, institutional to social movement)	Adequate paragraphing but uneven internal organization; some sub-parts well-structured while others ramble; minimal connective tissue between parts	Unstructured bullet points or continuous prose without part demarcation; no discernible internal logic within sub-parts; word count severely imbalanced (e.g., 100 words on (a), 10 on (e))
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	Rich, specific illustrations: for (a) references Simon Commission recommendations; for (b) cites Chipko, NBA, or Plachimada; for (c) names specific state DPC innovations (Kerala/Maharashtra); for (d) references specific campaigns (Champaran, Kheda, Dandi); for (e) cites Sachar Committee or specific NCM recommendations	Generic or partially accurate examples—e.g., 'Chipko movement' mentioned without specifics, 'Gandhi's movements' unnamed, or DPC functions listed without state-level illustration	No concrete examples; reliance on abstract statements; invented or clearly erroneous illustrations (e.g., attributing NCM to 1950 Constitution, citing non-existent DPC case law)
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Each sub-part closes with incisive observation: for (a) notes decolonization of borrowed institutions; for (b) connects to climate justice discourse; for (c) assesses DPC's actual empowerment record; for (d) evaluates Satyagraha's post-Independence relevance; for (e) critiques NCM's advisory limitations—demonstrating synthetic, forward-looking political science thinking	Formulaic or repetitive conclusions ('thus we see', 'in conclusion'); no sub-part-specific closing insight; fails to connect historical/institutional analysis to contemporary governance challenges	No conclusions for individual sub-parts; abrupt endings; or grand but irrelevant generalizations unrelated to specific question content

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →