renders below this block, the homepage copy came first, so every share of every blog post or PYQ page rendered the homepage card with og:url=upscanswercheck.com. Removed 2026-08-09; do not reintroduce. --> %sveltekit.head%
Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science 2022 Paper I 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Describe

Paper I — Q5

Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Describe the various steps for formulation of poultry broiler…

Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Describe the various steps for formulation of poultry broiler starter feed. (10 marks) (b) Describe the physiological role of various blood vessels of animals. (10 marks) (c) Explain the strategies adopted during disaster for livestock management. (10 marks) (d) Enlist the indigenous breeds of milch cattle and write in brief on their habitat and main characteristics. (10 marks) (e) Describe about the various aspects of 'Operation Flood Project' intended for dairy development in India. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक प्रश्न का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : (a) मुर्गी ब्रायलर स्टार्टर दाना बनाने के विभिन्न चरणों का वर्णन कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) पशुओं की विभिन्न रक्त वाहिकाओं की शारीरिक भूमिका का वर्णन कीजिए। (10 अंक) (c) आपदा के समय पशुधन प्रबंधन के लिए अपनाई जाने वाली रणनीतियों की व्याख्या कीजिए। (10 अंक) (d) दुधारू गायों की देशी नस्लों को सूचीबद्ध कीजिए और उनकी मुख्य विशेषताओं व प्राकृतिक वास पर संक्षेप में लिखिए। (10 अंक) (e) भारत में डेयरी विकास के उद्देश्य से 'ऑपरेशन फ्लड प्रोजेक्ट' के विभिन्न पहलुओं के विषय में वर्णन कीजिए। (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science questions

Directive word: Describe

This question asks you to describe. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The question demands descriptive answers across five sub-parts (a-e), each carrying 10 marks with ~150 words limit. Allocate approximately 30 words/3 minutes per sub-part, ensuring balanced coverage: for (a) detail feed formulation steps sequentially; for (b) categorize blood vessels by function; for (c) structure disaster strategies by pre/during/post phases; for (d) group breeds by region with habitat-milk trait linkage; for (e) trace Operation Flood chronologically with outcomes. Use bullet points for clarity within each part.

Key points expected

  • (a) Broiler starter feed: nutrient requirements (CP 22-24%, ME 3200 kcal/kg), ingredient selection (maize, SBM, fish meal), stepwise formulation—specification → ingredient selection → calculation → mixing → pelleting → quality control
  • (b) Blood vessels: arteries (oxygen transport, pressure maintenance), veins (return flow, valves), capillaries (exchange), portal systems (hepatic, hypophyseal), pulmonary vs systemic circulation
  • (c) Disaster management: early warning systems, evacuation/shelter, fodder reserves, veterinary first aid, carcass disposal, disease surveillance, rehabilitation—citing NDMP 2019 or state examples
  • (d) Indigenous milch breeds: Gir, Sahiwal, Red Sindhi, Tharparkar, Deoni, Hariana—habitat (Gujarat/Punjab/Rajasthan), heat tolerance, milk yield ranges (1500-2500 kg), disease resistance
  • (e) Operation Flood: Phase I-III (1970-1996), NDDB role, Amul model, Anand pattern, milk production growth (17M to 70M tonnes), White Revolution impact, challenges post-1996

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding20%10Correctly interprets 'describe' for (a), (b), (e) as systematic elaboration; 'explain' for (c) as cause-effect reasoning; 'enlist and write brief' for (d) as list-plus-characterization—no misfit between directive and response style across any sub-partUses generic descriptive approach for all sub-parts without adapting to 'explain' or 'enlist' nuances; some sub-parts under-developed relative to directive demandMisreads directives—treats all as 'describe' uniformly, or confuses 'explain' with mere listing; significant mismatch between what is asked and what is delivered
Content depth & accuracy20%10Precise nutrient specifications for starter feed (CP%, ME values); accurate vessel functions with physiological mechanisms; comprehensive disaster phases; correct breed-habitat mapping with yield data; Operation Flood phases with dates and outcomes—no factual errorsBroadly correct content but lacks specificity (e.g., 'high protein' instead of 22-24% CP); generic vessel descriptions; incomplete breed list; vague Operation Flood timelineMajor factual errors—wrong nutrient levels, confused vessel functions, incorrect breed habitats, conflated Operation Flood phases; demonstrates fundamental knowledge gaps
Structure & flow20%10Clear sub-part labeling (a)-(e); each part has internal logic—sequential steps for feed, functional grouping for vessels, phased approach for disaster, regional clustering for breeds, chronological for Operation Flood; smooth transitions between partsSub-parts identifiable but internal organization weak—jumbled vessel descriptions, mixed breed regions, unclear disaster phase separation; some parts read as disconnected pointsMissing or confused sub-part labels; rambling structure with no discernible organization within or across parts; excessive overlap between sub-parts or complete structural breakdown
Examples / case-law / data20%10Specific data: BIS feed standards, breed milk yields (Gir 2000 kg), Operation Flood statistics (milk production 17→70 million tonnes); examples—1999 Odisha cyclone for disaster, Gujarat for Gir, Amul/NDDB for dairy; cites NDMP, ICAR, or state agricultural policiesLimited data—round figures without sources; generic examples ('some cyclones') without specificity; mentions Amul/NDDB without operational details; no quantitative backing for claimsNo examples, data, or institutional references; purely theoretical treatment; fails to ground answers in Indian context or empirical evidence despite ample opportunity
Conclusion & analytical edge20%10Brief concluding synthesis across sub-parts linking nutrition-health-production-dairy development; critical insight—e.g., Operation Flood's success vs. current challenges (cooperative decline), or disaster management gaps post-2018 Kerala floods; forward-looking elementMechanical endings per sub-part without cross-linkage; descriptive conclusion without critical evaluation; misses opportunity to connect dairy development with nutrition security or climate resilienceAbrupt endings or no conclusions; purely factual regurgitation with zero analytical engagement; fails to demonstrate integration across animal husbandry themes or contemporary relevance

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science 2022 Paper I