(a) Define Placenta. Classify Placenta on the basis of histological structure with example. (20 marks)
(b) Classify the drugs acting on autonomic nervous system and write their mechanism of action with example. (15 marks)
(c) Describe the diagnosis o

Question

(a) Define Placenta. Classify Placenta on the basis of histological structure with example. (20 marks)
(b) Classify the drugs acting on autonomic nervous system and write their mechanism of action with example. (15 marks)
(c) Describe the diagnosis of choke and hernia along with surgical management in cattle. (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

Begin with a precise definition of placenta as the directive demands, then systematically address all three sub-parts: spend approximately 40% of effort on part (a) given its 20 marks, covering histological classification with clear examples; allocate 30% each to parts (b) and (c), ensuring autonomic drug mechanisms are explained with specific receptor actions, and surgical management includes both diagnostic techniques and operative procedures for choke and hernia in cattle.
- Part (a): Definition of placenta as fetomaternal organ for physiological exchange; histological classification into epitheliochorial (mare, sow), syndesmochorial (cow, ewe), endotheliochorial (carnivores), and hemochorial (primates, rodents) with structural basis of chorionic epithelium layers
- Part (a): Gross classification correlation—diffuse (horse, pig), cotyledonary (ruminants), zonary (carnivores), discoidal (primates)—linking to histological types
- Part (b): Classification into cholinergic (direct-acting like acetylcholine, methacholine; indirect-acting like neostigmine, physostigmine) and adrenergic (alpha agonists like phenylephrine, beta agonists like isoproterenol, blockers like propranolol, atropine)
- Part (b): Mechanism specificity—nicotinic/muscarinic receptor agonism/antagonism, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, alpha/beta adrenergic receptor subtypes and G-protein coupled signaling pathways
- Part (c): Choke diagnosis—esophageal obstruction history, regurgitation, saliva drooling, ruminal tympany, passage of stomach tube; hernia diagnosis—reducible/irreducible swelling, palpation of ring, ultrasonography for contents
- Part (c): Surgical management—choke: rumenotomy for proximal obstruction, esophagotomy for distal; hernia: herniorrhaphy with ring closure, mesh repair for large defects, postoperative care with antibiotics and analgesics

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	For (a), provides precise embryological definition emphasizing fetomaternal interface; for (b), distinguishes pharmacological classes by anatomical site and receptor specificity; for (c), differentiates diagnostic from therapeutic components explicitly—no conflation of choke with bloat or hernia types	Defines placenta generically; lists drug categories without clear autonomic division; mixes choke diagnosis with treatment without clear separation; minor directive misinterpretation in one sub-part	Fails to define placenta adequately; confuses autonomic with somatic nervous system drugs; describes only one condition in (c) or conflates choke with simple indigestion; misses directive requirements entirely
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	For (a), specifies number of tissue layers in each histological type (6, 5, 4, 3 layers); for (b), details receptor subtypes (M1-M5, α1/α2, β1/β2/β3) and second messenger systems; for (c), includes rumenotomy site (left paralumbar fossa), herniorrhaphy suture patterns (Mayo or vest-over-pants)	Correct histological types with examples but omits layer counts; basic drug mechanisms without receptor subtype detail; standard surgical procedures without anatomical specifics or complications	Incorrect histological classification (e.g., calling cow placenta epitheliochorial); wrong mechanisms (e.g., stating atropine is nicotinic blocker); dangerous surgical advice (e.g., esophagotomy for all choke cases); factual errors in anatomy or pharmacology
Structure & flow	20%	10	Clear tripartite structure with visible sub-headings; within (a), progresses from definition → histological basis → gross correlation; within (b), autonomic division → cholinergic/adrenergic branches → mechanisms; within (c), choke and hernia each with diagnosis → management subsections; logical cross-references between classification systems	Sub-parts labeled but internal organization weak; some mixing of classification criteria in (a); drug list without clear autonomic split; surgical description chronological but not clearly staged; readable but requires examiner effort	No sub-part demarcation; random information dump; confuses (a), (b), (c) content; incomplete coverage with disproportionate emphasis on one sub-part; illegible or chaotic structure preventing assessment
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	For (a), cites specific Indian livestock examples: cow/ buffalo (syndesmochorial), mare (epitheliochorial), goat (syndesmochorial), bitch (endotheliochorial); for (b), includes veterinary-specific drugs: xylazine (α2 agonist), detomidine, atropine sulfate, neostigmine methylsulfate; for (c), references common Indian field conditions—esophageal choke from dry fodder, umbilical hernia in crossbred calves, ventral hernia in buffaloes post-partum	Generic examples (human placenta hemochorial); standard pharmacology examples without veterinary context; common domestic animals for hernia without breed/species specificity; adequate but not India-centric	No examples or incorrect ones (e.g., cow as epitheliochorial); human drugs only (e.g., albuterol without veterinary equivalent clenbuterol); no surgical species context; examples contradict classification given
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Synthesizes across sub-parts: notes how placental barrier thickness influences drug transfer (linking (a) and (b)); discusses why autonomic drugs affect parturient animals differently due to placental type; prognostic indicators for surgical success in choke versus hernia; brief note on minimally invasive alternatives (esophageal bougienage, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy) showing contemporary awareness	Brief summary restating main points without synthesis; standard prognosis statements; no cross-linking between sub-parts; conventional closing without forward-looking element	No conclusion; abrupt ending; introduces new unsubstantiated claims; or repetitive summary adding no value; missing entirely in one or more sub-parts

(a) Define Placenta. Classify Placenta on the basis of histological structure with example. (20 marks) (b) Classify the drugs…

Directive word: Define

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science 2022 Paper II