Answer each of the following questions in about 150 words: (a) Discuss the problems faced in human resource planning. (10…

Answer each of the following questions in about 150 words: (a) Discuss the problems faced in human resource planning. (10 marks) (b) Elaborate the merits and limitations of 360° feedback. (10 marks) (c) Why is collective bargaining not effective in India? Explain its reasons. (10 marks) (d) How is voluntary separation different from involuntary separation? (10 marks) (e) Explain the productivity implications of labour turnover. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक प्रश्न का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : (a) मानव संसाधन नियोजन के सम्मुख आने वाली समस्याओं की विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) 360° प्रतिपुष्टि (फीडबैक) के गुणों एवं सीमाओं को विस्तार से समझाइए। (10 अंक) (c) भारत में सामूहिक सौदेबाजी क्यों प्रभावी नहीं है? इसके कारणों को समझाइए। (10 अंक) (d) स्वैच्छिक विरोजन (सेपरेशन) किस प्रकार अनैच्छिक विरोजन से भिन्न है? (10 अंक) (e) श्रम आवर्त के उत्पादकता निहितार्थों को समझाइए। (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 Commerce & Accountancy questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

This multi-part question requires balanced treatment across five sub-parts, each demanding distinct directive responses: 'discuss' for (a), 'elaborate' for (b), 'explain' for (c), 'differentiate' for (d), and 'explain' for (e). Allocate approximately 30 words per mark, distributing roughly 30 words to each sub-part. Structure each part with a brief contextual opening, 2-3 substantive points addressing the specific demand, and a concise link to the next part where possible. Prioritize precision over elaboration given the tight word constraint.

Key points expected

For (a): Resistance to change, inaccurate forecasting, environmental uncertainty, and lack of top management support as key HRP problems
For (b): 360° feedback merits include comprehensive perspective and reduced bias; limitations include time consumption, potential for gaming, and feedback distortion
For (c): Weak trade unions, fragmented bargaining structure, government intervention, and absence of strong industry-level federations limiting collective bargaining effectiveness in India
For (d): Clear distinction—voluntary separation (resignation, retirement, VRS) initiated by employee versus involuntary (discharge, dismissal, layoff) initiated by employer
For (e): Direct productivity implications through replacement costs, training gaps, and morale effects; indirect implications via knowledge drain and disruption of team dynamics
Cross-cutting: Integration of HRM theories (Fayol, Drucker) with Indian labour context (Industrial Disputes Act, Code on Industrial Relations)
Cross-cutting: Recognition of contemporary challenges like gig economy impact on traditional HRP and separation categories

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	Demonstrates precise command of each directive: 'discuss' for HRP problems with balanced argumentation; 'elaborate' for 360° feedback with detailed expansion; 'explain' for collective bargaining with causal reasoning; 'differentiate' for separation types with clear contrast; second 'explain' for turnover implications with cause-effect logic. No directive confusion or generic responses.	Addresses most directives correctly but may conflate 'discuss' with 'describe' or treat 'elaborate' superficially; some parts lack directive-appropriate depth.	Misidentifies directives or uses identical approach for all parts; 'differentiate' becomes mere listing without contrast; 'explain' lacks reasoning.
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	For (a) cites specific HRP problems (forecasting errors, resistance); for (b) covers both merits (multi-rater validity) and limitations (halo effect, rater fatigue); for (c) identifies structural weaknesses (multi-unionism, absence of national federations); for (d) precisely defines each separation type with legal grounding; for (e) distinguishes between direct and indirect productivity impacts with quantitative awareness.	Covers main concepts but with gaps—misses limitations in (b), omits legal framework in (d), or treats turnover implications generically without productivity linkage.	Significant factual errors; confuses voluntary/involuntary separation; misrepresents 360° feedback purpose; ignores Indian context in (c); superficial or absent treatment of any sub-part.
Structure & flow	20%	10	Each 30-word segment follows micro-structure: context-setting opening, 2-3 tightly packed substantive points, and purposeful transition. Clear visual or logical demarcation between (a)-(e); no bleeding across parts. Parallel structure where appropriate (merits/limitations; voluntary/involuntary).	Identifiable parts but uneven internal structure—some parts well-developed, others compressed; transitions between parts abrupt or missing; occasional word count imbalance.	Poorly demarcated parts or merged responses; rambling structure violating word limits; illogical sequencing (e.g., discussing limitations before merits); incomplete coverage of any part.
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	For (c) references Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Trade Unions Act 1926, or Code on Industrial Relations 2020; for (d) cites VRS schemes (Air India, BSNL) or retrenchment provisions; for (e) mentions measurable turnover costs (25-200% of annual salary per employee); for (b) references organizations using 360° feedback (Infosys, TCS). Indian context prioritized.	Generic or international examples without Indian specificity; mentions legal frameworks without application; no quantitative data for turnover implications.	No examples, case references, or data; purely theoretical treatment; inappropriate or fabricated examples; complete absence of Indian institutional context.
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Synthesizes across parts where feasible—linking HRP problems (a) to turnover implications (e), or collective bargaining weakness (c) to separation patterns (d). Offers forward-looking insight: technology-enabled HRP solutions, emerging gig economy challenges to traditional separation categories, or recommendations for strengthening collective bargaining. Demonstrates examiner-level perspective.	Brief summative closing without synthesis; parts treated as isolated silos; conventional observations without original insight.	No conclusion or abrupt ending; mere repetition of points; factual errors in closing; missing or severely underdeveloped final part.

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →