Economics 2023 Paper II 50 marks Explain

Q7

(a) Briefly explain the growth and structure of India's foreign trade in the post-liberalization period. (20 marks) (b) Critically examine the contribution of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in promoting foreign trade in India. (15 marks) (c) Discuss the salient features of India's New Foreign Trade Policy, 2023. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) आर्थिक उदारीकरण के पश्चात् की अवधि में, भारत के विदेशी व्यापार में वृद्धि तथा संरचना को संक्षेप में समझाइए। (20 अंक) (b) भारत के विदेशी व्यापार के प्रोत्साहन में विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्रों (सेज) के योगदान का आलोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) भारत की नवीन विदेश व्यापार नीति, 2023 की प्रमुख विशेषताओं की व्याख्या कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Economics questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The question demands explanatory and critical analysis across three parts. Spend approximately 40% of time/words on part (a) given its 20 marks, with 30% each on parts (b) and (c). Structure with a brief introduction highlighting India's trade transformation since 1991, then address each part sequentially with clear sub-headings, and conclude with integrated policy insights on trade-led growth.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Growth trends in India's merchandise and services trade post-1991, including rising trade-GDP ratio, shift from import substitution to export orientation, and structural shift toward services exports (IT, ITeS)
  • Part (a): Changing composition of trade—declining share of primary products, rising manufactures (engineering goods, chemicals, textiles) and petroleum products; regional diversification toward ASEAN, EU, US, and Africa
  • Part (b): SEZ mechanism—fiscal incentives, single-window clearance, infrastructure support; quantitative contribution to exports (share in total exports, employment generation, FDI inflows)
  • Part (b): Critical evaluation of SEZs—land acquisition controversies, revenue forgone concerns, uneven regional distribution, limited technology spillovers, and comparison with China's SEZ success
  • Part (c): FTP 2023 key pillars—export promotion through SCOMET liberalization, e-commerce export facilitation, Districts as Export Hubs initiative, streamlining of export obligation norms
  • Part (c): FTP 2023 structural shifts—replacement of incentive schemes with RoDTEP, focus on emerging areas like green hydrogen, drones, and medical devices; integration with PLI schemes

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Accurately distinguishes between trade growth (volume/value expansion) and trade structure (composition, direction, organization); correctly identifies SEZ legal framework under SEZ Act 2005; precisely defines FTP 2023's shift from incentive-based to entitlement-based regimeBasic understanding of post-liberalization trends but conflates growth with structure; generic description of SEZs without legal specificity; superficial coverage of FTP 2023 missing key conceptual shiftsConfuses pre and post-liberalization trade regimes; misidentifies SEZ benefits as purely fiscal without institutional aspects; factually incorrect about FTP 2023 provisions (e.g., claiming MEIS continuation)
Diagram / model15%7.5Includes trend line graph showing export-import trajectory (1991-2023) with key inflection points (1991, 2008 GFC, COVID-19); or Lewis dual-sector model diagram showing labor transfer to export manufacturing; or circular flow showing SEZ linkages with domestic economyMentions need for diagrams but provides poorly labeled or inaccurate sketches; or describes trends verbally without visual representationNo diagrams where clearly applicable; or irrelevant diagrams (e.g., generic demand-supply curves unrelated to trade questions)
Quantitative reasoning20%10Uses specific data: trade-GDP ratio rising from ~20% (1991) to ~45-50% (recent); merchandise exports crossing $400 billion (2022-23); SEZ share in exports (~23-25%); employment in SEZs (~2 million); FTP 2023 target of $2 trillion exports by 2030Round-figure approximations without specific years; vague statements like 'exports increased significantly' or 'SEZs contribute substantially'No quantitative data; or outdated/incorrect figures (e.g., claiming SEZs contribute 50%+ to exports); confuses absolute and relative metrics
Indian / empirical examples25%12.5For (a): cites specific export success stories (Suzlon in wind energy, Sun Pharma in generics); for (b): compares Noida SEZ (success) with Nandigram SEZ (failure); for (c): references specific FTP 2023 instruments like EPCG scheme, Advance Authorization, or District Export Promotion Committees in Varanasi/CoimbatoreGeneric examples without specificity; mentions 'IT sector' or 'textile SEZs' without naming firms or locations; broad reference to 'government schemes' without FTP 2023 detailsNo Indian examples; or inappropriate examples (pre-1991 trade patterns); confuses SEZs with EPZs/FTZs; cites FTP 2015 instead of 2023
Policy implication25%10Critically assesses: for (a) whether trade growth improved terms of trade and manufacturing competitiveness; for (b) evaluates SEZ sunset clause concerns and WTO compatibility of subsidies; for (c) analyzes FTP 2023's coherence with Atmanirbhar Bharat—whether export promotion aligns with import substitution goalsDescriptive policy listing without critical evaluation; one-sided praise or criticism without nuance; misses interconnection between parts (e.g., how FTP 2023 addresses SEZ limitations)No policy analysis; or purely normative statements ('government should do more'); fails to address the 'critically examine' directive in part (b)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Economics 2023 Paper II