General Studies 2022 GS Paper II 15 marks 250 words Compulsory How

Q19

How will I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE and USA) grouping transform India's position in global politics ? (Answer in 250 words) 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

I2U2 (भारत, इज़रायल, संयुक्त अरब अमीरात और संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका) समूह वैश्विक राजनीति में भारत की स्थिति को किस प्रकार रूपांतरित करेगा ? (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 General Studies questions

Directive word: How

This question asks you to how. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'how' requires explaining the mechanisms and pathways through which I2U2 transforms India's global position. Structure: brief introduction defining I2U2 → body covering strategic, economic, technological and geopolitical dimensions with specific transformations → conclusion on opportunities and challenges.

Key points expected

Strategic autonomy enhancement: I2U2 allows India to deepen ties with US and Israel without abandoning traditional Gulf partnerships (UAE), reducing dependency on any single bloc
Economic and energy security: access to advanced Israeli agri-tech, UAE capital, and US clean energy investments (e.g., $2 billion food parks initiative) reducing import vulnerabilities
Technology transfer and innovation: collaboration in semiconductors, space, AI and health sectors elevating India from consumer to co-producer in global value chains
Countering China in Indo-Pacific: I2U2 as West Asian Quad complementing QUAD, expanding India's strategic footprint beyond South Asia without formal alliance obligations
Diplomatic balancing act: managing Pakistan factor (US ally), Israel-Arab normalization dynamics, and Iran relations while gaining credibility as net-security provider

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	3	Clearly identifies 'how' demands causal mechanisms and transformative pathways, not mere description; distinguishes I2U2's unique value from bilateral ties or other minilaterals	Partially addresses transformation but mixes description with analysis; conflates I2U2 benefits with general India-US or India-Israel relations	Misreads directive as 'what is I2U2' or 'describe I2U2'; lists member countries and formation year without addressing transformation mechanisms
Content depth & accuracy	20%	3	Covers minimum 3 distinct transformation dimensions (strategic, economic, technological/geopolitical) with accurate details on I2U2's inaugural projects and India's specific gains	Two dimensions covered adequately but lacks specificity on actual I2U2 deliverables; some factual errors on member roles or project details	Superficial coverage with generic statements about 'better relations'; confuses I2U2 with QUAD or Abraham Accords; significant factual inaccuracies
Structure & flow	20%	3	Logical progression from definition → multi-dimensional analysis → synthesis; smooth transitions between strategic, economic and geopolitical aspects; maintains 250-word discipline	Recognizable structure but uneven weightage (over-detailed on one aspect, rushed on others); abrupt shifts between points without connecting logic	Disorganized or list-like presentation; no clear introduction or conclusion; exceeds word limit significantly or falls far short
Examples / case-law / data	20%	3	Cites specific I2U2 projects: $2 billion food parks in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, UAE renewable energy investments, semiconductor supply chain cooperation, or space collaboration frameworks	Vague reference to 'food security projects' or 'clean energy' without naming I2U2-specific initiatives; uses general India-UAE or India-US examples not tied to grouping	No concrete examples; relies on generic phrases like 'joint ventures' or 'technology sharing' without substantiation; examples from wrong forums
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	3	Balanced assessment acknowledging limitations (I2U2 still nascent, Iran factor, Pakistan's role in US calculus) while asserting India's strategic gains; forward-looking on West Asian geopolitics	Positive but one-sided conclusion without critical nuance; or abrupt ending without synthesis; generic statement about 'multipolar world'	No conclusion or purely descriptive closing; uncritical celebration without acknowledging constraints; contradicts own analysis

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →