General Studies 2022 GS Paper II 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Discuss

Q16

Besides the welfare schemes, India needs deft management of inflation and unemployment to serve the poor and the underprivileged sections of the society. Discuss. (Answer in 250 words) 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

कल्याणकारी योजनाओं के अतिरिक्त भारत को समाज के वंचित वर्गों और गरीबों की सेवा के लिए मुद्रास्फीति और बेरोजगारी के कुशल प्रबंधन की आवश्यकता है । चर्चा कीजिए । (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 General Studies questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' requires a balanced examination of multiple dimensions—why welfare schemes alone are insufficient, how inflation erodes purchasing power of the poor, how unemployment creates structural deprivation, and how synchronized macroeconomic management complements welfare. Structure as: brief introduction acknowledging welfare limitations → body analyzing inflation-unemployment-poverty nexus with evidence → conclusion on integrated policy approach.

Key points expected

  • Recognition that welfare schemes (PMGKAY, MGNREGA, etc.) provide relief but do not address root causes of poverty
  • Analysis of how inflation disproportionately hurts poor through food price spikes (CPI food inflation trends)
  • Explanation of unemployment dimensions: disguised unemployment in agriculture, jobless growth, youth unemployment (PLFS data)
  • Interlinkages: stagflation risks, Phillips curve limitations in Indian context, wage-price spiral
  • Policy integration: MPC inflation targeting, skill India, PLI for employment generation alongside welfare
  • Critical view: welfare as consumption support vs. inflation-unemployment management as production/income enhancement

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Demand-directive understanding20%3Clearly establishes that 'discuss' requires examining why welfare is necessary but insufficient, and how inflation-unemployment management operates as complementary structural intervention; avoids treating three elements in isolationAddresses all three elements (welfare, inflation, unemployment) but treats them sequentially without establishing interdependence; misses the 'besides' comparative logicDescribes welfare schemes extensively with minimal analysis of inflation-unemployment; or lists policies without discussing their poverty alleviation mechanism
Content depth & accuracy20%3Accurately explains inflation's regressive impact (CPI vs WPI divergence, food inflation burden), unemployment typology (seasonal, structural, disguised), and welfare scheme limitations; references MPC framework, NAIRU concept adapted to IndiaBasic understanding of inflation as 'price rise' and unemployment as 'joblessness'; mentions MGNREGA/PMGKAY but superficial on macroeconomic transmission mechanismsConfuses inflation with price level; conflates unemployment with poverty; factual errors on scheme objectives or inflation targeting timeline
Structure & flow20%3Logical progression: welfare achievements → welfare gaps → inflation as erosion factor → unemployment as income denial → integrated policy response; smooth transitions with signpostingThree separate paragraphs on welfare, inflation, unemployment without integration; or chronological listing without analytical framingDisorganized with repetition; no clear introduction or conclusion; word limit mismanagement with lopsided coverage
Examples / case-law / data20%3Specific data: recent CPI food inflation (2022-24 spikes), PLFS unemployment rates (7.1% urban, 5.4% rural 2022-23), PMGKAY coverage (80 crore beneficiaries); compares inflation targeting pre/post 2016; cites Rangarajan or Arvind Subramanian committee insightsGeneric mention of 'high inflation' or 'jobless growth'; names MGNREGA without specificity; no time-bound dataNo examples or outdated/inaccurate references; irrelevant case laws or international examples without Indian application
Conclusion & analytical edge20%3Synthesizes into coherent vision: welfare as social protection floor + macroeconomic stability as enabling environment; suggests way forward (urban employment mission, targeted subsidies with inflation control); critical insight on middle-income trap risksSummarizes main points without synthesis; generic conclusion on 'balanced approach' without specificityNo conclusion or abrupt ending; mere repetition of introduction; unrealistic or ideologically extreme recommendations

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2022 GS Paper II