Linguistic reorganization of Indian States was driven by popular pressure from below. Comment. (Answer in 250 words)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

भारतीय राज्यों का भाषाई पुनर्गठन नीचे से उठे जन-दबाव द्वारा संचालित था। टिप्पणी कीजिए। (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

The question as printed in the 2026 General Studies paper

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2026 General Studies questions

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

The demand for linguistic states was rooted in the freedom struggle: the 1920 Nagpur Congress session organised provincial committees on linguistic lines. After independence, however, the leadership deferred it, fearing balkanisation and instability, as the Dhar Commission and the JVP Committee advised.

Pressure from Below Popular pressure forced the change. Potti Sriramulu's fast unto death in December 1952 triggered widespread unrest and compelled the Centre to create Andhra State in 1953. This ignited mass movements—Vishalandhra in the Telugu areas, Samyukta Maharashtra in the west and Aikya Kerala in the south. In response, the Fazl Ali Commission (States Reorganisation Commission, 1953) was set up, leading to the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which created 14 states and 6 union territories largely on linguistic lines.

The momentum continued where aspirations remained unmet: agitations split bilingual Bombay into Maharashtra and Gujarat in 1960, and the Punjabi Suba movement led to the reorganisation of Punjab in 1966.

Role of the State Yet reorganisation was not driven solely from below. The central leadership and the SRC rejected a rigid "one language, one state" principle and balanced linguistic aspirations against administrative viability, economic self-sufficiency and national security. The Centre also delayed or overrode demands, resisting the split of Bombay until 1960.

Thus, while mass movements were the indispensable catalyst, reorganisation emerged as a pragmatic synthesis of democratic sub-nationalism and the institutional imperative of national integration.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: GS1 History/Polity: Linguistic Reorganization

What earns full marks: Balanced analysis of popular vs. state factors with specific examples and a clear judgment.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

The answer Comment on the claim that linguistic reorganisation was driven by popular pressure from below, weighing mass movements against the role of the Centre and the SRC, and give a balanced judgment. 15 marks · 250 words

comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close
Must cover
- Context: Congress's pre-1947 commitment (1920 Nagpur linguistic PCCs) and post-independence deferral (Dhar Commission, JVP Committee)
- Argument for: role of mass movements (Andhra/Potti Sriramulu, Samyukta Maharashtra, Aikya Kerala, Punjabi Suba)
- Argument against: role of the Centre and SRC (rejecting 'one language, one state', weighing security and viability, delaying demands)
- Judgment: synthesis of popular demand and administrative logic
Loses marks
- Narrating a simple chronological history of state formation
- Ignoring the 'popular pressure' aspect of the prompt
- Failing to provide a balanced judgment on the claim
Earns more
- JVP Committee (Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel, Pattabhi Sitaramayya)
- States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (14 states, 6 union territories)
- Post-1956 cases: Bombay bifurcation (1960), Punjab (1966)
- SRC's criteria beyond language: unity and security, administrative and economic viability
Extra mark
- Sardar Patel's and Nehru's initial caution about linguistic states
- SRC (Fazl Ali, K.M. Panikkar, H.N. Kunzru) constituted in December 1953

What "Comment" is asking you to do

Take a position on the statement and support it. Comment usually attaches to a quoted line in the short slots, so the reasoning must be compressed — an opening view, a few load-bearing reasons, and the limit of the claim.

Structure that answers it

Unpack what the statement asserts → your stance → two or three supporting reasons → the qualification that limits it

Where marks are lost

Neutral summary; a comment without a stance has not answered. Equally costly is accepting the quoted line wholesale and never testing where it fails.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

Model answer

How this answer will be evaluated

Evaluation rubric

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Structure that answers it

Where marks are lost

Practice this exact question

More from General Studies 2026 GS Paper I