General Studies 2026 GS Paper II 15 marks 250 words Discuss

GS Paper II — Q11

Discuss the position of the Governor in the federal polity of India. What is the nature of his power while giving assent to a…

Discuss the position of the Governor in the federal polity of India. What is the nature of his power while giving assent to a bill passed by the State Legislature? Is he bound by the aid and advice of his Council of Ministers in all his functions? (Answer in 250 words) 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

भारत की संघीय राज्य-व्यवस्था में राज्यपाल की स्थिति की विवेचना कीजिए। राज्य विधायिका द्वारा पारित विधेयक पर अनुमति देते समय उसकी शक्ति की प्रकृति कैसी है? क्या वह अपने सभी कार्यों में अपनी मंत्रिपरिषद की सहायता व सलाह से बाध्य है? (उत्तर 250 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Q11 of the 2026 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2026 General Studies paper

Read this question and its model answer in Hindi →

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

The Governor is the constitutional head of the State (Articles 153–162), appointed by the President (Article 155) and holding office at the President's pleasure (Article 156), though removal cannot be arbitrary (B.P. Singhal, 2010). He is both the titular head of the State, where real authority lies with the elected Council of Ministers, and the Union's link with the State; friction with Opposition-ruled States has made it a Centre–State flashpoint.

Assent to Bills Under Article 200, the Governor may assent, reserve the bill for the President (Article 201), or withhold assent and return a non-Money Bill for reconsideration; if the legislature repasses it, he shall not withhold assent. This is not an absolute veto: State of Punjab (2023) held that withholding must be followed by return, and State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor (April 2025) fixed timelines and granted 'deemed assent' under Article 142. However, the five-judge Presidential Reference opinion (November 2025) held that courts cannot prescribe timelines or grant deemed assent, that the Governor exercises discretion in choosing among the three options, and that only prolonged, unexplained inaction invites limited judicial review, without merits review.

Aid and Advice versus Discretion Under Article 163, the Governor acts on ministerial aid and advice except where the Constitution requires discretion (Shamsher Singh, 1974). Exceptions include the Article 200 choice (per the 2025 opinion), the report under Article 356, choosing a Chief Minister in a hung assembly, and Sixth Schedule and Article 371 responsibilities; under Article 163(2) his view on what is discretionary is final. Nabam Rebia (2016) held that discretion is the exception and does not extend to summoning or proroguing the Assembly.

Sarkaria (1988) and Punchhi (2010) recommendations on consulting the Chief Minister, fixed tenure and timelines for bills should be given statutory or constitutional form.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Principle > Institution or Article > Problem with example > Realistic reform

What earns full marks: Comprehensive analysis of Governor's position, assent powers, and advice, with specific Articles and judgments.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. The answer Discuss the Governor's position in India's federal polity, the nature of the assent power under Article 200, and whether he is bound by ministerial aid and advice in all functions. 15 marks · 250 words

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Governor's position as constitutional head of state
    • Nature of power in assenting to state bills
    • Distinction between discretionary and non-discretionary functions
    • Scope of binding nature of Council of Ministers' advice

    Loses marks

    • Reciting Articles without explaining their practical application
    • Failing to distinguish between discretionary and non-discretionary powers
    • Ignoring the specific question about assent to bills

    Earns more

    • Reference to Article 200 (Assent to Bills)
    • Reference to Article 163 (Aid and Advice)
    • Mention discretionary areas (Article 200 choices, Article 356 report, hung assembly, Article 163(2), Sixth Schedule/Article 371)
    • Balanced view on federalism and executive accountability

    Extra mark

    • Cite the November 2025 Presidential Reference opinion (no judicial timelines or deemed assent; limited review of prolonged inaction) or B.P. Singhal (2010) on removal
    • Reference Sarkaria (1988) or Punchhi (2010) Commission recommendations on appointment, tenure and timelines for bills
What "Discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2026 GS Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in