Mathematics 2023 Paper I 50 marks Solve

Q4

Find the rank of the matrix $A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ -1 & 3 & 0 & -4 \\ 2 & 1 & 3 & -2 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$ by reducing it to row-reduced echelon form. 15 (b) Trace the curve $y^2(x^2 - 1) = 2x - 1$. 20 (c) Prove that the locus of a line which meets the lines y = mx, z = c; y = -mx, z = -c and the circle x² + y² = a², z = 0 is c²m²(cy - mzx)² + c²(yz - cmx)² = a²m²(z² - c²)². 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

आव्यूह $A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 0 \\ -1 & 3 & 0 & -4 \\ 2 & 1 & 3 & -2 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$ का पंक्ति समानतित सोपानक रूप में समान्यन करके उसकी कोटि ज्ञात कीजिए। 15 (b) वक्र $y^2(x^2 - 1) = 2x - 1$ को अनुरेखित कीजिए। 20 (c) सिद्ध कीजिए कि रेखाओं y = mx, z = c; y = -mx, z = -c और वृत्त x² + y² = a², z = 0 से मिलने वाली रेखा का विद्यु-पथ c²m²(cy - mzx)² + c²(yz - cmx)² = a²m²(z² - c²)² है। 15

Directive word: Solve

This question asks you to solve. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Solve all three parts systematically, allocating approximately 30% time to part (a) matrix rank reduction, 40% to part (b) curve tracing as it carries highest marks, and 30% to part (c) 3D geometry proof. Begin with clear identification of each part, show complete row operations for (a), detailed curve analysis with asymptotes and intercepts for (b), and rigorous parametric derivation for (c).

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Correct reduction of 4×4 matrix to row-reduced echelon form using elementary row operations, identification of pivot positions, and accurate rank determination
  • Part (b): Complete curve tracing of y²(x²-1)=2x-1 including symmetry analysis, asymptotes (vertical at x=±1), intercepts, domain restrictions, and sketch of two branches
  • Part (c): Proper parameterization of lines meeting given skew lines and circle, elimination of parameters to derive the stated quartic locus surface
  • Verification of rank by checking linear dependence of rows/columns or using determinant test for part (a)
  • Analysis of singular points and behavior near asymptotes for part (b) curve

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Setup correctness15%7.5Correctly sets up augmented matrix for part (a), identifies curve type and restrictions for part (b), and establishes proper parametric equations for lines in part (c) with correct geometric interpretation of given constraintsBasic setup present but minor errors in initial matrix writing, incomplete domain analysis for curve, or partially correct parameterizationMajor setup errors such as wrong matrix entries, incorrect curve equation interpretation, or fundamentally wrong approach to 3D geometry
Method choice20%10Selects optimal row reduction strategy for (a), applies systematic curve tracing methodology (asymptotes, symmetry, derivatives) for (b), and chooses efficient elimination method for (c) using appropriate geometric insightAcceptable methods chosen but suboptimal (e.g., using cofactor expansion for rank), incomplete curve analysis, or longer elimination routeInappropriate methods such as determinant calculation instead of row reduction when specifically asked, or trial-and-error approach without methodology
Computation accuracy25%12.5Flawless arithmetic in all row operations with correct pivot selection, accurate algebraic manipulation in curve analysis, and error-free elimination leading to exact final locus equation matching the required formMinor computational slips (sign errors, arithmetic mistakes) that don't fundamentally alter the answer, or partially correct final formPersistent calculation errors leading to wrong rank, incorrect curve shape, or failure to reach the stated locus equation
Step justification25%12.5Every row operation explicitly stated with clear notation (R1→R1+R2 etc.), curve properties rigorously justified with limits and derivatives, and geometric reasoning clearly explained for the locus derivation with intermediate steps shownSome steps shown but gaps in justification, missing explanations for key transitions, or assumed results without verificationBare answers with no working, or unjustified jumps that make verification impossible
Final answer & units15%7.5Clear statement of rank=3 for part (a), accurate labeled sketch with key features for part (b), and exact reproduction of target locus equation for part (c) with proper interpretation of the surfaceCorrect final answers but poorly presented, incomplete sketch, or correct equation but without geometric interpretationMissing final answers, wrong conclusions, or failure to present the required equation form in part (c)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Mathematics 2023 Paper I