Paper II — Q4
(a) The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the…
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? 20 marks
Explain the success of ASEAN as a regional organisation. 15 marks
Explain India's relations with the European Union in the context of Brexit. 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
आधुनिकीकरण शोध प्रबंध (थीसिस) का कथन है कि संपन्नता स्थिर लोकतंत्र को जन्म देती है । आप किस प्रकार भारत को विश्व के सबसे बड़े सफल लोकतंत्र को एक असाधारण उदाहरण के तौर पर देखते हैं ? (20 अंक)
एक क्षेत्रीय संगठन के रूप में आसियान (ASEAN) की सफलता की व्याख्या कीजिये । (15 अंक)
ब्रेक्सिट (Brexit) के संदर्भ में भारत के यूरोपीय संघ के साथ संबंधों की व्याख्या कीजिये । (15 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Indian democracy as an exception to the modernization thesis
Lipset ("Some Social Requisites of Democracy", 1959) held that income, urbanisation and literacy are prerequisites of stable democracy. India in 1947 was poor, largely illiterate, agrarian and divided by caste, religion and language, yet it sustained democracy where many post-colonial states turned authoritarian. Przeworski and Limongi (1997) refined the thesis: wealth does not cause democracy but helps it survive, which makes a poor democracy's survival more striking. The explanations are historical and institutional. First, the Congress-led freedom struggle was an inclusive mass movement that instilled democratic habits before statehood. Second, the Constitution created universal adult suffrage (Article 326), an autonomous Election Commission (Article 324) and flexible federalism, with linguistic reorganisation and asymmetric provisions (Article 371, the Sixth Schedule) accommodating regional aspirations; a constitution-minded elite under Nehru, an apolitical army and a strong party organisation (Myron Weiner) reinforced them. Third, pluralism enabled Rajni Kothari's "Congress system", in which mobilisation mediated cleavages rather than subverting the order; Lijphart called India's early decades consociational. Blemishes need noting: the Emergency (1975–77) suspended civil liberties, and in 2021 Freedom House rated India "partly free" and V-Dem "electoral autocracy", assessments the Government rejects. Yet the ballot restored democracy in 1977, turnout was about 66 per cent in 2024 with women voting at rates similar to men, and power alternates at the Centre and in the states. The poor vote at higher rates than the affluent, inverting the modernization expectation.
(b) Success of ASEAN as a regional organisation
ASEAN, founded by the Bangkok Declaration of 1967 and enlarged to eleven members with Timor-Leste's admission in October 2025, has endured through the "ASEAN Way": consultation (musyawarah), consensus (mufakat), non-interference and informal institutionalism, codified in the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (1976). This flexibility preserved peace among members with stark developmental gaps and different political systems. Economically it moved from the ASEAN Free Trade Area (1992) to the ASEAN Economic Community (2015), integrated regional production networks, and anchored the RCEP (in force 2022), from which India withdrew in 2019. Diplomatically, "ASEAN Centrality" rests on anchoring wider forums: the ASEAN Regional Forum (1994), the East Asia Summit (2005) and the ADMM-Plus (2010), plus its own Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (2019). By avoiding military pacts and hedging, it manages US-China contestation without becoming a battleground. The limits are clear: the Five-Point Consensus on Myanmar (2021) is unimplemented, a binding South China Sea Code of Conduct remains elusive after two decades, and the July 2025 Thailand-Cambodia clashes ended only with outside pressure alongside the ASEAN chair's mediation.
(c) India–EU relations after Brexit
The India-EU Strategic Partnership dates from 2004, and London had served as India's main economic, linguistic and political gateway to Europe. Brexit decoupled India's EU policy from its UK ties: India lost its most familiar interlocutor inside the EU, while the EU lost the member closest to India through history, the diaspora and the City of London. New Delhi responded by deepening direct ties with France and Germany while engaging Brussels as a regulatory power. The Porto Leaders' Meeting (May 2021) agreed to resume FTA talks (formerly BTIA), which restarted in June 2022; other steps include the India-EU Connectivity Partnership (2021), alignment with the EU's Indo-Pacific strategy (September 2021), the Trade and Technology Council (2022) and cooperation on the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (2023). The FTA negotiations were announced as concluded at the New Delhi summit in January 2026, though issues such as the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism remain sensitive. In parallel, India pursues a separate Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with the UK (2021), a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement signed in July 2025, and a Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement with the EFTA states (2024), a pragmatic, multi-aligned European strategy.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: Concept > Theory and theorist > Application > Critique
What earns full marks: Demonstrates deep theoretical understanding, precise application to the specific case, and critical analysis with relevant examples.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Define modernization thesis and explain India's democratic success as an exception to the affluence-democracy link. 20 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Define modernization thesis (affluence breeds stable democracy)
- Identify India as an exceptional case (low income, high democracy)
- Provide 3-4 reasons for India's democratic resilience
- Critique the thesis or offer a counter-argument
Loses marks
- Descriptive account of Indian democracy without theoretical link
- Ignoring the 'exceptional case' aspect of the question
- No critique or balanced view of the thesis
Earns more
- Mention specific theorists (e.g., Lipset, Huntington)
- Cite specific Indian democratic institutions or events
- Compare India with other low-income democracies
- Discuss the role of social capital or civil society
Extra mark
- Reference specific economic data or indices
- Mention a specific recent political development
- (b) Explain the factors contributing to ASEAN's success as a regional organization. 15 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Define ASEAN and its core principles (e.g., consensus, non-interference)
- Identify 3-4 key factors for its success
- Provide examples of successful initiatives or agreements
- Briefly mention challenges or limitations
Loses marks
- General description of ASEAN without explaining 'success'
- Ignoring the 'regional organisation' context
- No mention of specific mechanisms or principles
Earns more
- Mention specific treaties (e.g., ASEAN Charter, ACFTA)
- Discuss the role of 'ASEAN Way' in conflict resolution
- Reference specific member states' contributions
- Compare with other regional organizations
Extra mark
- Cite a specific recent summit or agreement
- Mention a specific statistic on trade or investment
- (c) Explain India's relations with the EU in the context of Brexit. 15 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Define Brexit and its immediate impact on EU-India relations
- Identify 3-4 key areas of India-EU cooperation
- Discuss how Brexit has altered the dynamic (e.g., trade, security)
- Mention India's strategic response or new opportunities
Loses marks
- General description of India-EU relations without Brexit context
- Ignoring the 'context of Brexit' requirement
- No analysis of the changed dynamics
Earns more
- Reference specific trade agreements or negotiations
- Discuss the role of UK as a separate partner
- Mention specific sectors (e.g., technology, defense)
- Compare pre- and post-Brexit engagement levels
Extra mark
- Cite a specific recent bilateral meeting or statement
- Mention a specific economic figure related to trade
What "Explain" is asking you to do
Make the working of something clear — what sets it off, what follows from what, and what it produces. Explain is the Commission's mechanism word: it dominates the technical papers and the “explain why” stems, where the marks sit in the causal chain and not in the label.
Structure that answers it
State what it is → the initiating condition → the chain of cause, step by step → an instance where it plays out → what the chain produces
Where marks are lost
Describing what something looks like instead of why it works that way. Naming the stages without linking them reads as description too.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Political Science & IR 2021 Paper II
- Q1 Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) Discuss the political economy approach…
- Q2 (a) "The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above societ…
- Q3 (a) Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with r…
- Q4 (a) The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you e…
- Q5 Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) Discuss the strategic implications of I…
- Q6 (a) "Non-alignment was little more than a rational strategy on the part of a materially w…
- Q7 (a) Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integr…