Agriculture 2021 Paper II 50 marks Comment

Q8

(a) What is the food production and consumption pattern of India in the last fifty years ? 15 (b) What do you mean by 'hunger' and 'hidden hunger' ? Comment on various strategies in combating hunger. 15 (c) What are the different "National Dietary Guidelines" of India ? What is your opinion on balanced diet of Indians ? 20

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) भारत में पिछले पचास वर्षों का खाद्य उत्पादन तथा उपभोग प्रतिरूप क्या है ? 15 (b) 'भुख' तथा 'प्रच्छन्न भुख' से आप क्या समझते हैं ? भुख से मुकाबला करने के लिए विभिन्न रणनीतियों पर टिप्पणी कीजिए । 15 (c) भारत में विभिन्न "राष्ट्रीय आहारीय दिशानिर्देश" क्या हैं ? भारतीयों में संतुलित आहार पर आपकी राय क्या है ? 20

Directive word: Comment

This question asks you to comment. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'comment' in part (c) requires analytical judgment backed by evidence, while parts (a) and (b) demand descriptive-explanatory treatment. Allocate approximately 30% time/words to part (a) on production-consumption trends, 30% to part (b) on hunger typologies and strategies, and 40% to part (c) on dietary guidelines and your critical opinion on balanced diets. Structure with a brief integrated introduction, three distinct sections labeled (a), (b), (c), and a conclusion synthesizing food security linkages across all parts.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Green Revolution phases (1960s-80s), post-Green Revolution stagnation, 1990s liberalization impacts, and recent diversification trends; per capita availability shifts from cereals to diversified diets
  • Part (a): Consumption pattern transition—declining cereal consumption, rising protein/fat intake, persistent regional disparities (NSSO data trends)
  • Part (b): Distinction between hunger (caloric/protein inadequacy, FAO undernourishment) and hidden hunger (micronutrient deficiencies—vitamin A, iron, zinc, iodine)
  • Part (b): Multi-pronged strategies—TPDS/PDS reforms, ICDS, Mid-Day Meal, NFSA 2013, biofortification (Golden Rice, iron-rich pearl millet), food fortification, dietary diversification
  • Part (c): ICMR-NIN dietary guidelines (2011), food pyramid/plate composition, recommended dietary allowances (RDA) for different age/activity groups
  • Part (c): Critical opinion on balanced diet—gap between guidelines and actual consumption, protein deficiency in vegetarian diets, rising processed food/obesity paradox, need for region-specific guidelines

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precisely defines 'hidden hunger' as micronutrient deficiency distinct from caloric hunger; accurately distinguishes between production (supply-side, FAO/FAOSTAT metrics) and consumption (demand-side, NSSO/ICAR surveys); correctly identifies ICMR-NIN 2011 guidelines with specific RDA values; for part (c), demonstrates nuanced understanding that balanced diet varies by agro-ecological zone, occupation, and life stageBasic definitions of hunger and hidden hunger without micronutrient specificity; conflates production growth with consumption adequacy; mentions dietary guidelines generically without version/year; opinion on balanced diet lacks analytical depth or relies on generic statementsConfuses hunger with malnutrition or undernourishment with underweight; fails to distinguish production from consumption data sources; omits hidden hunger entirely or equates it with famine; dietary guidelines misidentified or confused with food security acts; opinion absent or purely descriptive
Quantitative reasoning15%7.5Cites specific data: cereal production growth (from ~50 million tonnes 1950s to ~300 million tonnes 2020s), per capita availability (400+ g cereals/day), NSSO consumption expenditure trends showing cereal share falling below 50%; hidden hunger prevalence (anemia 50%+ women, vitamin A deficiency 20%+ children); includes comparative statistics across decades or statesRound-figure estimates without specific years or sources; vague statements like 'production increased manifold'; mentions hunger indices (GHI) without India's ranking or trend; dietary guidelines mentioned without quantitative RDA referencesNo quantitative data or grossly incorrect figures; confuses absolute production with per capita availability; ignores population growth impact on net availability; no mention of NFHS/NSSO/FAO data sources
Indian context examples25%12.5For (a): Green Revolution in Punjab-Haryana, eastern India rice intensification, recent pulses production push; for (b): specific biofortified varieties (Dhanashree rice, Dhanshakti pearl millet), state-specific PDS models (Tamil Nadu universal, Chhattisgarh MIS), POSHAN Abhiyaan; for (c): regional dietary patterns (Mediterranean-like Kerala diet vs. cereal-heavy north), tribal nutrition issues, urban-rural consumption divergence with NSSO evidenceGeneric mention of Green Revolution without spatial specificity; PDS mentioned without state variations; biofortification mentioned without Indian varieties; dietary guidelines applied uniformly without regional adaptation discussionNo Indian examples or inappropriate foreign case studies; ignores sub-national diversity; conflates Indian food systems with generic developing country patterns; opinion on balanced diet lacks Indian empirical grounding
Diagram / process15%7.5Includes production-consumption flow diagram for part (a); hunger-hidden hunger Venn diagram or micronutrient deficiency cascade for part (b); ICMR food pyramid/plate diagram for part (c) with annotations showing gaps; OR describes processes like food fortification supply chain, biofortification breeding-to-plate pathway, or PDS leakage correction mechanisms with step-wise logicMentions diagrams without drawing or describing them; describes processes verbally without systematic sequencing; food pyramid mentioned without critical annotationNo diagrammatic or process description; answer entirely prose without visual or sequential structuring; ignores opportunity to illustrate complex interrelationships
Policy / extension angle25%12.5Critically evaluates NFSA 2013, POSHAN Abhiyaan 2018, Food Fortification Regulations 2018, and Eat Right India movement; identifies implementation gaps (PDS leakage, micronutrient program coverage, dietary guideline dissemination); proposes extension strategies—farmer field schools for nutrient-dense crops, community nutrition education, integration of Ayushman Bharat with dietary counseling; for part (c), offers evidence-based opinion on revising guidelines for contemporary lifestyle diseasesLists policies without critical evaluation; mentions PDS/ICDS/NFSA as success stories without caveats; extension limited to generic 'awareness generation'; opinion on balanced diet lacks policy linkageNo policy mention or confuses policies (e.g., NFSA with NMSA); ignores implementation challenges; no extension or behavioral change discussion; opinion purely personal without policy relevance

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Agriculture 2021 Paper II