Agriculture 2024 Paper I 50 marks Discuss

Q2

(a) Write down the physical environmental factors affecting the crop production. Discuss the effects of changing rainfall pattern on crop production in India. 20 marks (b) Describe the improved cultivation practices of Chickpea under the following heads: 20 marks (i) Improved varieties (ii) Seed rate and row to row spacing (iii) Nutrient management (iv) Weed management (v) Insect-pest and disease management (c) Discuss about the cropping patterns of Middle Gangetic Plain and Western Plateau and hills. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) फसल उत्पादन को प्रभावित करने वाले भौतिक पर्यावरणीय कारकों को लिखिए । भारत में बदलते वर्षा के पैटर्न का फसल उत्पादन पर पड़ने वाले प्रभावों का वर्णन कीजिए । 20 (b) निम्नलिखित शीर्षकों के अंतर्गत, चने की उन्नत खेती पद्धतियों का वर्णन कीजिए : 20 (i) उन्नत किस्में (ii) बीज दर एवं कतार से कतार की दूरी (iii) पोषक तत्व प्रबंधन (iv) खरपतवार प्रबंधन (v) कीट एवं रोग प्रबंधन (c) मध्य गंगा के मैदान एवं पश्चिमी पठार व पहाड़ी के सस्यक्रम (क्रॉपिंग पैटर्न) के बारे में वर्णन कीजिए । 10

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' demands a comprehensive, analytical treatment with balanced coverage across all sub-parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, 40% to part (b) with its five sub-heads (4 marks each), and 20% to part (c) for 10 marks. Structure: Introduction briefly contextualizing environmental constraints in Indian agriculture; Body addressing (a) with climatic factors and rainfall variability impacts, (b) with systematic coverage of chickpea practices using specific varieties and agronomic data, (c) with comparative cropping patterns; Conclusion synthesizing sustainable intensification linkages across parts.

Key points expected

  • For (a): Physical environmental factors (temperature, rainfall, humidity, light, wind) with their physiological impacts; changing rainfall pattern effects including delayed monsoon, deficit/excess distribution, extreme events, and regional crop impacts (e.g., kharif failures in Maharashtra, rabi moisture stress)
  • For (b)(i): Improved chickpea varieties—desi (JG 11, JAKI 9218) and kabuli (JG 16, JGK 1) with specific traits like wilt resistance, early maturity, high yield
  • For (b)(ii)-(v): Seed rate (80-100 kg/ha), spacing (30×10 cm), nutrient management (20:40:0 NPK + 20 kg S), weed management (fluchloralin/Pendimethalin), IPM for pod borer (Helicoverpa) and Fusarium wilt management
  • For (c): Middle Gangetic Plain cropping patterns—rice-wheat, rice-lentil, sugarcane-based systems with intensity 180-200%; Western Plateau and Hills—rainfed sorghum-based, cotton-based, and millets systems with lower intensity and drought adaptations
  • Cross-cutting synthesis: Climate resilience linkages between rainfall variability (a), drought-tolerant chickpea as rabi alternative (b), and diversification needs in both agro-ecologies (c)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness25%12.5Demonstrates precise understanding of agro-climatic indices (PET, moisture adequacy index), accurate chickpea phenology (C3 plant, symbiotic N-fixation), correct distinction between desi/kabuli types, and accurate characterization of AEZ 9 (Middle Gangetic) vs AEZ 6 (Western Plateau) per ICAR classificationCovers basic factors correctly but confuses kabuli/desi adaptation zones, misstates critical growth stages for moisture stress, or conflates Western Plateau with Malwa Plateau characteristicsFundamental errors like treating chickpea as C4 plant, confusing photoperiodism with vernalization, or describing Gangetic Plain as predominantly rainfed
Quantitative reasoning15%7.5Provides specific quantitative data: rainfall variability coefficients (CV 20-30% for all-India, >30% for peninsular), chickpea yield benchmarks (15-20 q/ha for improved varieties), seed rates with precision, fertilizer doses with S/Zn micronutrients, and cropping intensity figures for both regionsMentions approximate ranges without specificity (e.g., 'high seed rate,' 'moderate rainfall') or provides outdated yield figures without varietal contextNo quantitative data, incorrect units (q/ha vs t/ha confusion), or fabricated statistics without agronomic basis
Indian context examples25%12.5Cites specific evidence: for (a) IMD rainfall trend data, NCAER/CRIDA studies on monsoon shifts; for (b) ICRISAT-HOPE project varieties, state-specific releases (Maharashtra's Phule Vikram, Karnataka's BGD 112); for (c) district-level patterns (Faizabad rice-wheat, Solapur cotton-sorghum), with tribal farming systems in Western GhatsGeneric references to 'some states' or 'certain regions' without specificity, or mixes up state-wise varietal recommendationsNo Indian examples, uses temperate/European agriculture references, or entirely incorrect regional attributions
Diagram / process20%10Includes well-labeled diagram: rainfall variability map of India OR chickpea growth stages with critical irrigation periods OR comparative land use maps for Middle Gangetic vs Western Plateau; process flow for IPM in chickpea or water balance schematic for rainfed agricultureMentions diagrams but describes poorly, or provides tables without visual integration; schematic without proper labeling of growth stagesNo visual element, or completely irrelevant sketch (e.g., photosynthesis diagram without application to question)
Policy / extension angle15%7.5Integrates relevant policy: PMFBY for rainfall risk, National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA), chickpea promotion under NFSM-Pulses, ICRISAT's Hybrid Parents Research Consortium, WDC-PMKSY for rainfed areas, and ATMA extension for improved chickpea adoption in Madhya Pradesh (India's leading producer)Mentions NFSM or PMFBY generically without linking to specific question components, or confuses central vs state schemesNo policy reference, or outdated schemes (e.g., only mentioning TMC without current context), or irrelevant international comparisons without Indian policy linkage

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Agriculture 2024 Paper I