Paper II — Q1
Discuss the following in about 150 words each: (a) Histology of endocrine and exocrine pancreas (10 marks) (b) Monday morning…
Discuss the following in about 150 words each: (a) Histology of endocrine and exocrine pancreas (10 marks) (b) Monday morning sickness in equines and its management (10 marks) (c) Socio-economic impact of zoonotic diseases on public health (10 marks) (d) Collection and transportation of raw milk (10 marks) (e) Grading and fabrication of sheep carcass (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक की लगभग 150 शब्दों में विवेचना कीजिए : (a) एण्डोक्राइन एवं एक्सोक्राइन अग्नाशय का उत्तक-विज्ञान (10 अंक) (b) घोड़ों में मंडे मॉर्निंग सिकनेस तथा उसका प्रबंधन (10 अंक) (c) पशुजन्य रोगों का जन स्वास्थ्य पर सामाजिक-आर्थिक प्रभाव (10 अंक) (d) कच्चे दूध का संग्रहण एवं परिवहन (10 अंक) (e) भेड़ के शव की ग्रेडिंग एवं फेब्रिकेशन (10 अंक)
Directive word: Discuss
This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'discuss' requires presenting key facts with analytical depth across all five sub-parts. Allocate approximately 30 words (20% time) per sub-part, maintaining strict parity since all carry equal 10 marks. Structure each 150-word response as: brief definition/introduction (25-30 words), core content with specific technical details (90-100 words), and concluding significance/implication (20-30 words). No overarching introduction or conclusion is needed for this multi-part format.
Key points expected
- (a) Histology: Islets of Langerhans (alpha, beta, delta cells with hormones); exocrine acinar cells (zymogen granules, duct system); staining characteristics; functional correlation
- (b) Monday morning sickness: Atypical myopathy etiology (hypoglycin A in sycamore seeds); clinical signs (stiffness, myoglobinuria, recumbency); immediate management (IV fluids, glucose, antioxidants); prevention (pasture management)
- (c) Zoonotic socio-economic impact: Direct costs (treatment, lost wages); indirect costs (trade restrictions, culling); One Health framework; Indian burden (rabies, brucellosis, anthrax statistics)
- (d) Milk collection/transport: Farm-level practices (udder preparation, first milk rejection); cold chain maintenance (4°C within 2 hours); bulk milk coolers; tanker standards (stainless steel, insulation, agitation)
- (e) Sheep carcass: Grading parameters (conformation, fat cover, maturity); Indian standards vs. EUROP system; fabrication cuts (leg, loin, shoulder, breast); dressing percentage factors
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand-directive understanding | 20% | 10 | Demonstrates precise understanding that 'discuss' requires balanced exposition and critical linkage across all five diverse technical domains; for (a) integrates structure-function relationships, for (b) connects etiology to clinical management, for (c) balances epidemiological and economic dimensions, for (d) covers quality preservation chain, for (e) distinguishes grading from fabrication | Addresses all five parts but treats 'discuss' superficially as mere description; misses analytical connections between components within each sub-part; one part may be significantly underdeveloped | Misinterprets directive as 'list' or 'define'; omits one or more sub-parts entirely; provides fragmented, unconnected facts without exposition; exceeds word limit on one part at expense of others |
| Content depth & accuracy | 20% | 10 | Displays specialist-level accuracy: for (a) specifies cell types and their secretions correctly; for (b) identifies hypoglycin A mechanism precisely; for (c) cites quantified disease burden; for (d) states critical temperature-time combinations; for (e) applies correct conformation classes; no factual errors across veterinary anatomy, pathology, public health, dairy technology, and meat science | Generally accurate but with minor errors: confuses endocrine/exocrine pancreatic portions, misstates clinical signs of atypical myopathy, provides generic zoonotic examples without Indian specificity, omits critical temperature thresholds, or conflates grading parameters | Substantial factual errors: incorrect cell types in islets, wrong etiology for Monday morning sickness, conflates zoonotic with non-zoonotic diseases, describes pasteurization instead of raw milk handling, or confuses sheep with goat/cattle carcass criteria |
| Structure & flow | 20% | 10 | Each 150-word segment follows disciplined internal architecture: precise opening definition, logically sequenced body (anatomical progression for pancreas; temporal for disease management; economic cascade for zoonoses; chronological for milk chain; anatomical for fabrication), and purposeful conclusion; clear visual separation between (a)-(e); maintains word discipline without truncation | Readable structure but uneven: some parts lack clear opening or conclusion; occasional logical jumps; minor word imbalance with one part slightly over/under-developed; transitions between components within parts are abrupt | Disorganized or rambling; no discernible structure within parts; severe word imbalance (e.g., 250 words on pancreas, 50 on carcass); runs parts together without labeling; illegible handwriting or formatting compounds structural failure |
| Examples / case-law / data | 20% | 10 | Strategic deployment of high-value specifics: for (c) cites NCDC/NIV zoonotic disease burden data, rabies mortality statistics, or brucellosis seroprevalence in Indian livestock; for (b) references UK/European atypical myopathy outbreaks; for (d) mentions FSSAI regulations or NDDB cold chain protocols; for (e) cites BIS or Agmark grading standards; quantitative elements enhance credibility | Generic or implied examples without specificity: mentions 'rabies is important' without data, 'cold chain is needed' without temperature parameters, or 'grading exists' without standard references; examples are relevant but not precisely anchored | No examples, data, or regulatory references; or irrelevant/invented statistics; confuses Indian and international contexts; examples contradict established facts; pure theoretical treatment without applied grounding |
| Conclusion & analytical edge | 20% | 10 | Each sub-part closes with purposeful synthesis: for (a) links histological organization to integrated metabolic regulation; for (b) emphasizes preventive pasture management over reactive treatment; for (c) advocates One Health investment cost-effectiveness; for (d) stresses farmer-processor interface quality responsibility; for (e) connects grading to producer price realization; demonstrates interdisciplinary veterinary insight | Functional but generic conclusions: restates main points without advancement; misses opportunity for policy or practical implication; conclusions are present but could apply to any similar question; lacks distinctive analytical signature | Absent, abrupt, or erroneous conclusions; introduces new unconnected information at end; purely descriptive termination; or concludes with obvious statements ('pancreas is important'); demonstrates failure to synthesize technical knowledge into veterinary professional insight |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science 2021 Paper II
- Q1 Discuss the following in about 150 words each: (a) Histology of endocrine and exocrine pa…
- Q2 (a) Enumerate the different compartments of ruminal stomach. Explain the topographic anat…
- Q3 (a) What are zero disease concept and herd immunity? Discuss in detail about chemoprophyl…
- Q4 (a) Discuss the various methods of preservation of hides and skin. Elaborate the differen…