Anthropology 2022 Paper I 50 marks Discuss

Q8

(a) Discuss the contemporary population problems in the light of various socio-cultural demographic theories. (20 marks) (b) What do you understand by blood group systems ? How is HLA system different from those based on red cell antigens ? (15 marks) (c) Discuss how anthropological knowledge of the human body may be used in designing equipments and articles of human use. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) विभिन्न सामाजिक-सांस्कृतिक जनसांख्यिकीय सिद्धांतों के आलोक में समसामयिक जनसंख्या समस्या की विवेचना कीजिए । (20) (b) रक्त समूह प्रणाली से आप क्या समझते हैं ? एच एल ए प्रणाली, लाल कोशिका प्रतिजनों पर आधारित प्रणाली से कैसे भिन्न है ? (15) (c) चर्चा करें कि मानव शरीर के मानवशास्त्रीय ज्ञान का उपयोग मानव उपयोग के उपकरणों और वस्तुओं को डिजाइन करने में कैसे किया जा सकता है । (15)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Anthropology questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' requires a comprehensive, analytical treatment across all three parts. Structure with a brief integrated introduction, then address each sub-question sequentially with clear headings: (a) population theories with contemporary problems, (b) blood group systems with HLA distinction, and (c) anthropometry in design. Conclude by synthesizing how biological and cultural anthropology converge in addressing human welfare.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Application of demographic transition theory, Malthusian theory, and cultural theories (e.g., Caldwell's wealth flows, Easterlin's relative cohort size) to India's population challenges—ageing, fertility decline, migration, urbanization
  • Part (a): Critical analysis of how socio-cultural factors (son preference, dowry, female education, religious norms) interact with demographic outcomes in Indian context
  • Part (b): Clear definition of ABO and Rh systems as red cell antigen-based; explanation of HLA as tissue/lymphocyte antigen system with role in immune recognition and transplant compatibility
  • Part (b): Systematic comparison: chromosome location (HLA on Chr 6 vs. blood groups), polymorphism level, inheritance pattern, clinical significance beyond transfusion
  • Part (c): Ergonomic application of anthropometric data (ISAK standards, NHANES Indian adaptations) in designing workspaces, military equipment, agricultural tools, and consumer products
  • Part (c): Specific Indian examples: LCA Tejas cockpit design, railway seat dimensions, PPE sizing during COVID-19, and gender-disaggregated data needs

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise definitions of demographic theories, accurate description of blood group antigens vs. HLA complex (Class I/II, MHC), correct anthropometric terminology (somatotypes, somatometry, kinanthropometry), and error-free factual content across all three partsGenerally correct concepts with minor inaccuracies—confusing HLA with blood typing, oversimplified demographic theory statements, or generic anthropometry without specific measurementsFundamental errors such as treating HLA as a blood group, misattributing theories (e.g., calling Easterlin Malthusian), or confusing anthropometry with anthropometry vs. craniometry without clarity
Theoretical framing20%10Sophisticated integration of multiple theoretical frameworks—demographic transition with Second Demographic Transition, Caldwell's intergenerational wealth flows, McNicoll's institutional approach, and bio-social models for anthropometry; demonstrates theory-critique linkageLists relevant theories adequately but treats them descriptively without critical engagement or inter-theory comparison; mentions theories for parts (a) and (c) but lacks depth in (b)Missing theoretical content entirely, or presents theories as isolated facts without application to the question; conflates incompatible frameworks without recognition
Ethnographic / Indian examples20%10Rich, contextualized Indian data: NFHS-5 fertility trends, Sample Registration System mortality data, state-level demographic variations (Kerala vs. Bihar), DRDO/ISRO anthropometric surveys, and specific design cases like Indian Railways ergonomics or space suit developmentSome Indian examples present but generic (mentioning 'population growth in India' without data) or poorly integrated; international examples substituted where Indian ones are expectedNo Indian examples, or inappropriate examples (using Western demographic data as universal); complete absence of ethnographic grounding in population or design contexts
Comparative analysis20%10Systematic comparison in part (b) of HLA vs. red cell systems across multiple parameters; comparative evaluation of demographic theories' explanatory power for different population problems; cross-cultural comparison in anthropometric design needsSome comparative elements present but underdeveloped—lists differences without analytical framework, or compares only superficially (e.g., 'HLA is more complex than ABO' without elaboration)No comparative structure; treats each topic in isolation; fails to address the 'how is HLA different' component of part (b) or misses cross-theory evaluation in part (a)
Conclusion & applied angle20%10Synthesizes biological and socio-cultural anthropology showing how anthropometric data inform population health policy; connects HLA typing to India's organ transplant infrastructure; proposes future directions (personalized medicine, gerontechnology design); demonstrates policy relevanceBrief summary conclusion without synthesis; mentions applications but in generic terms ('anthropometry is useful'); no forward-looking or policy-oriented closingMissing conclusion, or purely repetitive summary; no applied dimension despite part (c)'s explicit demand; ends abruptly without integrating the three question parts

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2022 Paper I