Anthropology 2022 Paper II 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Write short notes

Q1

Write short notes on the following in about 150 words each: 10×5=50 (a) Pit-dwellers of Kashmir (b) Varna and Buddhism (c) Dharma versus Religion (d) Safeguards for linguistic minorities in India (e) Westernisation and Modernisation

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक पर लगभग 150 शब्दों में लघु टिप्पणी लिखिए : 10×5=50 (a) कश्मीर के गर्तवासी (b) वर्ण एवं बौद्धधर्म (c) धर्म बनाम रिलिजन (d) भारत में भाषाई अल्पसंख्यकों हेतु परिरक्षण (e) पश्चिमीकरण एवं आधुनिकीकरण

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Anthropology questions

Directive word: Write short notes

This question asks you to write short notes. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'write short notes' demands concise, information-dense responses for each sub-part with precise terminology and focused coverage. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words total ÷ 5 parts), spending roughly 3-4 minutes on each note. Structure each note as: definitional opening (1 line), core content with specific facts/theories (2-3 lines), and a concluding significance statement (1 line). Prioritize factual accuracy and named sources over elaborate analysis given the word constraint.

Key points expected

(a) Pit-dwellers of Kashmir: Burzahom and Gufkral sites; Neolithic culture; pit dwellings with rammed earth floors; domesticated sheep/goat; birch bark artifacts; no pottery initially; later mud-brick structures
(b) Varna and Buddhism: Buddha's critique of Brahmanical varna; doctrine of karma replacing birth-based status; sangha as egalitarian alternative; practical compromises with existing social order; Upali the barber and Sunita the sweeper as exemplars
(c) Dharma versus Religion: dharma as duty/righteousness/ cosmic order vs. religion as faith-based system; no equivalent term in Indian tradition; dharma encompasses ethics, law, social obligation; Rajiv Dhavan's constitutional distinction
(d) Safeguards for linguistic minorities: Article 29-30 protection; Article 350B Special Officer; Eighth Schedule languages; Official Language Act 1963; state reorganization on linguistic basis; Gorkhaland/Mizo examples
(e) Westernisation and Modernisation: M.N. Srinivas's distinction; Westernisation as cultural borrowing from West; Modernisation as universal structural changes; Yogendra Singh's critique; Indian modernity as selective adaptation

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	20%	10	Demonstrates precise factual command across all five notes: for (a) correctly identifies Burzahom as primary site with Period I pit-dwelling characteristics; for (b) accurately distinguishes Buddha's theoretical egalitarianism from practical sangha accommodations; for (c) captures dharma's untranslatable semantic range; for (d) cites correct constitutional articles with specificity; for (e) distinguishes Srinivas's conceptual separation from conflation in popular usage	Covers basic facts for most sub-parts with minor inaccuracies—may confuse Burzahom with other Neolithic sites, oversimplify Buddhist varna rejection, or conflate Westernisation/Modernisation without clear conceptual separation; constitutional articles may be approximate	Contains significant factual errors: misidentifies pit-dwellers as Mesolithic, presents Buddhism as completely abolishing caste, treats dharma and religion as simple synonyms, omits key constitutional safeguards, or uses Westernisation and Modernisation interchangeably without distinction
Theoretical framing	20%	10	Deploys appropriate theoretical frameworks efficiently: for (a) references Kashmir Neolithic chronology (c. 3000-1000 BCE); for (b) cites Weber's 'religious ethic of world-rejection' or Dumont's hierarchy/encompassment; for (c) invokes Indological scholarship (Halbfass, Lingat); for (d) connects to Kymlicka's minority rights theory or Indian pluralism; for (e) explicitly uses Srinivas's 'Social Change in Modern India' and Yogendra Singh's 'Modernization of Indian Tradition'	Shows awareness of relevant scholars without systematic deployment—may mention Srinivas or Weber in passing without elaborating their specific arguments; theoretical references remain implicit rather than explicit due to word constraints	Lacks any theoretical anchoring; presents information as isolated facts without scholarly context; fails to indicate that Westernisation/Modernisation distinction originates with Srinivas; omits Indological debate on dharma entirely
Ethnographic / Indian examples	20%	10	Provides specific, named illustrations for each sub-part: for (a) Gufkral parallel, birch bark manuscripts, bone tools; for (b) Upali, Sunita, or Ambedkar's later Buddhist conversion; for (c) Rajiv Dhavan's constitutional analysis or specific dharmashastra references; for (d) concrete cases like Mizoram's Mizo language recognition or Gorkhaland movement; for (e) post-Independence institutional examples (IITs, civil service) versus cultural practices	Includes some specific examples but with uneven coverage—strong on (e) with general modernisation instances but weak on (a) with only generic 'Neolithic tools'; may substitute broad regional references for precise ethnographic details	Relies entirely on abstract description without concrete Indian instances; 'examples' remain at level of 'some tribes' or 'ancient people' without names; fails to ground constitutional safeguards in actual linguistic minority experiences
Comparative analysis	20%	10	Executes implicit or explicit comparisons within word limits: for (a) contrasts Kashmir pits with Gangetic Neolithic (no pottery vs. wheel-made); for (b) compares Buddhist sangha equality with Jain anekantavada or contemporary Brahmanical practice; for (c) contrasts dharma's inclusivity with Semitic religious exclusivism; for (d) compares Article 29 vs. 30 protections; for (e) distinguishes Westernisation's cultural specificity from Modernisation's universal claims, noting Indian selective adaptation	Attempts comparison for high-yield sub-parts (c, e) but treats others descriptively; may note that Westernisation ≠ Modernisation without elaborating the comparative mechanism; comparisons remain stated rather than developed	Treats all five notes as isolated descriptive exercises with no cross-referencing or comparative dimension; misses opportunity to contrast (b) and (c) on Indic religious concepts; presents (e) as two separate phenomena without relational analysis
Conclusion & applied angle	20%	10	Each 30-word note achieves closure with contemporary relevance: for (a) links to Kashmir heritage conservation; for (b) notes Ambedkarite Buddhism's continuing challenge to caste; for (c) connects to current debates on secularism and uniform civil code; for (d) references recent Eighth Schedule expansions or language policy controversies; for (e) evaluates ongoing relevance of Srinivas's framework for understanding Indian modernity	Provides functional conclusions for 2-3 sub-parts, typically (d) and (e), with remaining notes ending abruptly on descriptive facts; applied angle remains generic ('relevant today') without specific contemporary hook	Notes lack any concluding statement; end with isolated facts (e.g., 'they used bone tools') without significance; no attempt to connect historical/anthropological material to contemporary policy, identity politics, or ongoing scholarly debates

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →