Q8
(a) (i) Among the following compounds I and II, which has more carbonyl stretching frequency in IR spectra? Explain: I II 5 marks (ii) Complete the following reaction. Write the structures of A, B and C, and explain how IR spectroscopy is helpful to distinguish among them: H₃C OH CH₃ H⁺ A + B + C 10 marks (b) (i) Calculate the λ_max values of the following compounds: (1) (2) 10 marks (ii) Explain why 1,3-butadiene exhibits a lower λ_max for π → π* transitions compared to that of 1,3,5-hexatriene. 5 marks (c) (i) What is McLafferty rearrangement? Discuss the mass spectral fragmentation of butyl butyrate with the following given data of ions: m/z 101, m/z 73, m/z 71 and m/z 56 Write the structures of fragment ions. 10 marks (ii) (1) A compound with MF C₂H₂BrCl exhibits two doublets (J = 16 Hz) in its PMR spectrum. Suggest a suitable structure along with other possible structures. (2) How can the structures of A and B be decided based on their UV spectral data? [ λ_max = 296 nm (ε_max = 10700) and λ_max = 281 nm (ε_max = 20800) ] 10 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) (i) निम्नलिखित यौगिकों I तथा II में किसकी कार्बनिल तनन आवृत्ति IR स्पेक्ट्रा में अधिक है? व्याख्या कीजिए : I II 5 अंक (ii) निम्नलिखित अभिक्रिया को पूर्ण कीजिए। A, B और C की संरचना लिखिए तथा व्याख्या कीजिए किस प्रकार से IR स्पेक्ट्रमिकी इनमें अंतर बताने में सहायक है : H₃C OH CH₃ H⁺ A + B + C 10 अंक (b) (i) निम्नलिखित यौगिकों की λ_max मानों का परिकलन कीजिए : (1) (2) 10 अंक (ii) 1,3-ब्यूटाडाइन के π → π* संक्रमण का λ_max मान 1,3,5-हेक्साट्राइन की तुलना में कम क्यों है? व्याख्या कीजिए। 5 अंक (c) (i) मैकलफर्टी पुनर्विन्यास क्या है? ब्यूटिल ब्यूटिरेट के द्रव्यमान स्पेक्ट्रमी खंडन में निम्नलिखित आयन प्राप्त हुए हैं : m/z 101, m/z 73, m/z 71 और m/z 56 इनकी विवेचना कीजिए। खंड आयनों की संरचना लिखिए। 10 अंक (ii) (1) एक यौगिक, जिसका आण्विक सूत्र (MF) C₂H₂BrCl है, PMR स्पेक्ट्रम में दो डबलेट (J = 16 Hz) देता है। एक उपयुक्त संरचना का सुझाव दीजिए तथा संभावित दूसरी संरचनाएं भी दीजिए। (2) A तथा B की संरचना को UV स्पेक्ट्रमी आँकड़ों के आधार पर कैसे तय कर सकते हैं? [ λ_max = 296 nm (ε_max = 10700) और λ_max = 281 nm (ε_max = 20800) ] 10 अंक
Directive word: Explain
This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Begin with a concise introduction on spectroscopic techniques as structural tools. For (a), allocate ~15 marks worth: explain carbonyl frequency trends using conjugation/hybridization effects, then complete the dehydration reaction identifying A (alkene), B (ether), C (alkene isomer), with IR distinguishing C=C vs C=O regions. For (b), spend ~15 marks: apply Woodward-Fieser rules for λ_max calculations, then explain conjugation length effect on HOMO-LUMO gap. For (c), allocate ~20 marks: define McLafferty rearrangement with radical mechanism, draw fragmentation pathway for butyl butyrate showing m/z 101 (acylium), 73, 71, 56; for (c)(ii) deduce trans-1-bromo-2-chloroethene from J=16 Hz coupling, and assign λ_max 296 nm to trans-stilbene (higher ε, planar) vs 281 nm to cis-stilbene using steric hindrance arguments. Conclude with integration of spectroscopic data for structural elucidation.
Key points expected
- (a)(i) Correct identification of higher ν(C=O) in compound with less conjugation/stronger C=O bond; explanation via resonance and bond order effects
- (a)(ii) Acid-catalyzed dehydration of 2-butanol giving 1-butene (A), 2-butene mixture (B=trans, C=cis or B=ether if intermolecular); IR distinguishes O-H (3300 cm⁻¹), C=C (1650 cm⁻¹), C-O (1100 cm⁻¹) regions
- (b)(i) Accurate Woodward-Fieser rule application: base value + substituent increments + solvent corrections for both diene/triene systems
- (b)(ii) Explanation of bathochromic shift with extended conjugation: decreased HOMO-LUMO energy gap in hexatriene vs butadiene
- (c)(i) McLafferty rearrangement definition: γ-hydrogen transfer via six-membered cyclic TS with radical cation cleavage; specific fragment structures for butyl butyrate (m/z 101: CH₃CH₂CH₂CO⁺, m/z 73: CH₃CH₂CO⁺, m/z 71: C₄H₉⁺, m/z 56: C₄H₈⁺·)
- (c)(ii)(1) trans-1-bromo-2-chloroethene from J=16 Hz (trans vicinal coupling); cis isomer excluded by large J value
- (c)(ii)(2) UV assignment: higher λ_max with lower ε (296 nm, ε=10700) for trans-stilbene vs lower λ_max with higher ε (281 nm, ε=20800) for cis-stilbene due to steric hindrance reducing planarity and conjugation efficiency in cis form
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 25% | 12.5 | Demonstrates precise understanding of IR frequency-determining factors (conjugation, ring strain, H-bonding), Woodward-Fieser rules for dienes/enones, McLafferty rearrangement mechanism, and UV λ_max-conjugation relationships; correctly identifies trans-coupling constants and steric effects on chromophore planarity | Shows basic grasp of spectroscopic principles but confuses conjugation effects on IR frequencies, makes minor errors in Woodward-Fieser increments, or provides incomplete McLafferty mechanism without electron movement arrows | Fundamental misconceptions: states wrong compound for higher ν(C=O), applies wrong base values for λ_max calculation, describes McLafferty as simple cleavage without rearrangement, or confuses cis/trans UV assignments |
| Mechanism / equation | 20% | 10 | Clear electron-pushing mechanism for McLafferty rearrangement showing six-membered cyclic transition state, γ-H transfer, and β-cleavage; acid-catalyzed dehydration mechanism with carbocation intermediate and regioselectivity explanation | Mechanism shown with some arrow errors or missing intermediates; McLafferty described verbally without proper electron flow; dehydration mechanism incomplete regarding E1/E2 competition | No mechanism provided for McLafferty rearrangement; incorrect E2 mechanism for dehydration; arrows violating electron movement rules; missing key intermediates |
| Numerical accuracy | 15% | 7.5 | Precise λ_max calculations using correct Woodward-Fieser parameters: base value 214 nm (heteroannular) or 253 nm (homoannular), accurate substituent increments (5 nm for alkyl, 5 nm for exocyclic double bond, 30 nm for extending conjugation), correct solvent corrections | Correct base value selection but arithmetic errors in summation; one increment missed or wrong value used; no solvent correction applied | Wrong base values (confusing diene types), incorrect increment values, or no calculation attempted; J value mentioned without structural correlation |
| Diagram / structure | 25% | 12.5 | All structures clearly drawn: compounds I and II with proper stereochemistry, dehydration products A/B/C with correct connectivity, fragment ions with charges and radical dots explicitly shown, C₂H₂BrCl isomers with spatial arrangement indicating trans geometry; IR correlation table or spectrum regions sketched | Structures drawn but with ambiguous stereochemistry; missing charges on fragment ions; incomplete set of products; poor handwriting affecting clarity | Missing critical structures (no fragment ion structures, no A/B/C identification); incorrect molecular formulas; no diagrams despite question requirement; structures contradict written explanation |
| Application context | 15% | 7.5 | Effectively integrates multiple spectroscopic techniques for structural proof: IR for functional group identification and reaction monitoring, UV for conjugation extent, MS for molecular weight and fragmentation pattern, PMR for stereochemistry; demonstrates how combined data solves real analytical problems in natural product or synthetic chemistry | Treats each spectroscopic method in isolation without cross-validation; mentions applications generically without linking to specific problem; no discussion of complementary nature of techniques | No application context provided; fails to explain how IR distinguishes A/B/C or how UV decides between stereoisomers; treats spectroscopy as purely theoretical exercise |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Chemistry 2022 Paper II
- Q1 (a) Ionization of 3,4-dichloro-1,2,3,4-tetramethylcyclobutene in SbF₅-SO₂ at –75 °C produces a reaction intermediate of its own kind. Predi…
- Q2 (a) Predict the products X and Y in the following reactions: (5×3=15 marks) (i) [compound] →(1) O₃ (2) H₂O₂→ X + Y (ii) [compound] →PBr₃→ […
- Q3 The compound A, acetal of acetaldehyde, on reaction with B, under given reaction conditions, yields C and the final product D : (i) Write d…
- Q4 (a) (i) Complete the following reaction by showing stepwise reaction mechanism for the formation of products : (ii) The compound A is optic…
- Q5 (a) Write the structures of nucleosides and nucleotides, and discuss the primary structures of DNA and RNA. (10 marks) (b) Write down the p…
- Q6 (a) (i) Predict the products in the following reactions: Propose suitable mechanism to justify your answer. (ii) Giving justification, writ…
- Q7 (a) Discuss the different types of secondary structures of proteins and compare these structures with tertiary structure of proteins. 15 ma…
- Q8 (a) (i) Among the following compounds I and II, which has more carbonyl stretching frequency in IR spectra? Explain: I II 5 marks (ii) Comp…