Chemistry 2024 Paper I 50 marks Solve

Paper I — Q2

(a) State Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Show that for a particle in a one-dimensional box having length from 0 to L, the…

(a)

State Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Show that for a particle in a one-dimensional box having length from 0 to L, the two normalised eigen functions corresponding to the eigenvalues E₁ and E₂ (characterised by quantum numbers 1 and 2 respectively) are orthogonal to each other. 10 marks

(b)
(i)

Calculate the bond order for the following : (I) Oxygen, (II) Superoxide, (III) Peroxide, (IV) Dioxygenyl ion. Which will have the highest stability ? 10 marks

(ii)

Draw the molecular orbital diagram for CO. 10 marks

(c)
(i)

Calculate the limiting radius ratio for the crystals with coordination number 3 and 6. 10 marks

(ii)

Explain stoichiometric defects with an example. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

हाइजेनबर्ग अनिश्चितता सिद्धांत का उल्लेख कीजिए । प्रदर्शित कीजिए कि एक-विमीय बॉक्स, जिसकी लंबाई 0 से L तक है, उसमें एक कण के लिए दो प्रसामान्यीकृत आइगेन फलन जो कि आइगेनमान E₁ और E₂ (क्रमशः क्वांटम संख्या 1 और 2 द्वारा विशेषीकृत) के तदनुसार हैं, एक दूसरे के लंबकोणीय हैं । (10 अंक)

(b)
(i)

निम्नलिखित के लिए आबंध क्रम का परिकलन कीजिए : (I) ऑक्सीजन, (II) सुपरऑक्साइड, (III) परोक्साइड, (IV) डाइऑक्सिजेनिल आयन। इनमें से किसका स्थायित्व उच्चतम होगा ? (10 अंक)

(ii)

CO के आणविक कक्षक आरेख को खींचिए । (10 अंक)

(c)
(i)

समन्वय संख्या 3 और 6 वाले क्रिस्टलों के सीमांत त्रिज्या अनुपात का परिकलन कीजिए । (10 अंक)

(ii)

एक उदाहरण सहित स्टॉइकियोमीट्री दोषों की व्याख्या कीजिए । (10 अंक)

Q2 of the 2024 UPSC Mains Chemistry Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2024 Chemistry paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Heisenberg's uncertainty principle; orthogonality of particle-in-a-box eigenfunctions

Statement. It is impossible to know simultaneously and exactly both the position and the momentum of a particle along the same coordinate. The product of their uncertainties has a lower limit:

Δx · Δpₓ ≥ ħ/2 = h/4π

  • The principle follows from the fact that the position and momentum operators do not commute: [x̂, p̂ₓ] = iħ.
  • It is not a limitation of instruments; it is a property of matter waves.
  • Consequence: an electron cannot move in a sharply defined Bohr orbit, so we can speak only of probabilities (orbitals).

Particle in a box (0 ≤ x ≤ L).

  • The potential is V = 0 inside the box and ∞ outside. The boundary conditions ψ(0) = ψ(L) = 0 give ψₙ = A sin(nπx/L) and Eₙ = n²h²/8mL², with n = 1, 2, 3, …
  • Normalisation, ∫₀ᴸ A² sin²(nπx/L) dx = A²L/2 = 1, gives A = √(2/L).

So:

  • ψ₁ = √(2/L) sin(πx/L), with E₁ = h²/8mL²;
  • ψ₂ = √(2/L) sin(2πx/L), with E₂ = 4h²/8mL².

Orthogonality. We must show I = ∫₀ᴸ ψ₁ψ₂ dx = 0.

I = (2/L) ∫₀ᴸ sin(πx/L) sin(2πx/L) dx

Using sin A sin B = ½[cos(A − B) − cos(A + B)]:

I = (1/L) ∫₀ᴸ [cos(πx/L) − cos(3πx/L)] dx = (1/L) [ (L/π) sin(πx/L) − (L/3π) sin(3πx/L) ]₀ᴸ = (1/π)(sin π − sin 0) − (1/3π)(sin 3π − sin 0) = 0

Hence ψ₁ and ψ₂ are orthogonal.

General result (n ≠ m).

∫₀ᴸ ψₙψₘ dx = (1/L) ∫₀ᴸ [cos((n − m)πx/L) − cos((n + m)πx/L)] dx = (1/π) [ sin((n − m)πx/L)/(n − m) − sin((n + m)πx/L)/(n + m) ]₀ᴸ = 0,

because sin(kπ) = 0 for any integer k. For n = m, the same integral equals 1. So ∫ψₙψₘ dx = δₙₘ: the set is orthonormal. This is expected, since eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator (Ĥ) that belong to different eigenvalues (E₁ ≠ E₂) are always orthogonal.

(b)(i) Bond orders of O₂, O₂⁻, O₂²⁻ and O₂⁺

For O₂ and its ions, the 2s–2p mixing is small, so σ2p_z lies below π2p. Counting valence electrons only (the 1s cores, KK, cancel out), BO = (N_b − N_a)/2.

O₂ (12 valence e⁻): KK σ2s² σ*2s² σ2p_z² π2p_x² π2p_y² π*2p_x¹ π*2p_y¹.

  • N_b = 8, N_a = 4, so BO = 2.
  • Two unpaired electrons: paramagnetic.

Superoxide O₂⁻ (13 e⁻): π*³.

  • N_b = 8, N_a = 5, so BO = 1.5.
  • One unpaired electron: paramagnetic (e.g. KO₂).

Peroxide O₂²⁻ (14 e⁻): π*⁴.

  • N_b = 8, N_a = 6, so BO = 1.
  • All electrons paired: diamagnetic (e.g. Na₂O₂, H₂O₂).

Dioxygenyl O₂⁺ (11 e⁻): π*¹.

  • N_b = 8, N_a = 3, so BO = 2.5.
  • One unpaired electron: paramagnetic (e.g. O₂⁺[PtF₆]⁻).

Stability order: O₂⁺ > O₂ > O₂⁻ > O₂²⁻. Stability and bond strength rise with bond order, so O₂⁺ is the most stable and O₂²⁻ the least. Bond lengths follow the reverse order: O₂⁺ ≈ 112 pm < O₂ 121 pm < O₂⁻ ≈ 133 pm < O₂²⁻ ≈ 149 pm.

(b)(ii) Molecular orbital diagram of CO

  • Electron count. CO has 14 electrons in all, 10 of them valence electrons (C 2s²2p², O 2s²2p⁴). It is isoelectronic with N₂.
  • Why the atomic levels differ. Oxygen is more electronegative, so its 2s and 2p atomic orbitals lie well below those of carbon. As a result, each bonding MO is weighted towards O and each antibonding MO towards C.
  • Why the MO order is N₂-like. The C 2s–2p energy gap is small, so s–p mixing is strong. This pushes the σ orbital from 2p (5σ) above the π set (1π).
Diagram: MO diagram of CO

Configuration. KK (3σ)² (4σ)² (1π)⁴ (5σ)². In the older notation this is σ2s² σ*2s² π2p⁴ σ2p².

  • Bond order: bonding electrons 3σ² + 1π⁴ + 5σ² = 8, antibonding 4σ² = 2, so BO = (8 − 2)/2 = 3. This is consistent with the short, strong bond (112.8 pm, bond energy ≈ 1072 kJ mol⁻¹).
  • Magnetism: CO is diamagnetic, since no electrons are unpaired.
  • HOMO = 5σ: a lone pair concentrated on carbon. CO therefore acts as a σ-donor through carbon in metal carbonyls.
  • LUMO: 2π*, an empty antibonding π orbital, also larger on carbon. It accepts electron density from filled metal d-orbitals (π back-bonding), which is why the C–O stretching frequency falls from 2143 cm⁻¹ in free CO in carbonyls.
  • Dipole: despite oxygen's higher electronegativity, the dipole moment is tiny (≈ 0.11 D) and its negative end lies on carbon. The carbon lone pair (5σ) offsets the polarity of the bonding orbitals.

(c)(i) Limiting radius ratios for coordination numbers 3 and 6

Let r be the cation radius and R the anion radius. At the limiting ratio, the cation touches every surrounding anion, and those anions just touch one another. If r/R falls below this value, the cation "rattles" in its hole, anion–anion repulsion dominates, and a lower coordination number becomes favoured.

Diagram: Limiting radius ratios

CN = 3 (trigonal planar).

  • The three anion centres form an equilateral triangle of side 2R.
  • The cation sits at the centroid, at a distance (r + R) from each anion centre.
  • In the right triangle formed by the centroid, one vertex and the mid-point of a side, the angle at the centroid is 60°. So sin 60° = R/(r + R).
  • r + R = R/sin 60° = 2R/√3, which gives r/R = 2/√3 − 1 = 0.155.

CN = 6 (octahedral).

  • The equatorial plane of the octahedron contains four anions at the corners of a square of side 2R, with the cation at the centre. The other two anions lie above and below this plane.
  • The half-diagonal equals r + R, so (r + R) = √2 · R (equivalently, cos 45° = R/(r + R)).
  • This gives r/R = √2 − 1 = 0.414.

Stable ranges:

  • CN 3 is stable for 0.155–0.225 (e.g. B₂O₃).
  • CN 4 (tetrahedral) for 0.225–0.414 (ZnS).
  • CN 6 for 0.414–0.732 (NaCl, with r/R ≈ 0.52).
  • CN 8 (cubic) for 0.732 or more (CsCl, with r/R ≈ 0.93).

These values rest on a hard-sphere ionic model, so they are guides rather than rules; covalent crystals often violate them.

(c)(ii) Stoichiometric defects

Stoichiometric (intrinsic) defects are point defects in an ionic solid that leave the cation : anion ratio exactly as given by the formula, and keep the crystal electrically neutral. They form spontaneously because their small enthalpy cost is repaid by a gain in configurational entropy. For this reason every crystal above 0 K contains some, and their number rises with temperature.

Diagram: Schottky and Frenkel defects

1. Schottky defect.

  • An equal number of cation and anion vacancies (one pair for a 1:1 salt), so neutrality and stoichiometry are both preserved.
  • It is favoured in highly ionic solids with cations and anions of similar size and a high coordination number.
  • Examples: NaCl, KCl, KBr, CsCl. NaCl contains roughly 10⁶ Schottky pairs per cm³ at room temperature.
  • Consequences: density falls, because mass is lost while the volume is unchanged; ionic conductivity rises, because ions hop into vacancies; and lattice energy falls slightly.

2. Frenkel (dislocation) defect.

  • An ion, usually the smaller cation, leaves its lattice site for an interstitial position, creating a vacancy–interstitial pair.
  • It is favoured by a large size difference between the ions and a low coordination number.
  • Examples: AgCl, AgBr, AgI, ZnS.
  • Consequences: density is essentially unchanged, because no ion leaves the crystal. Conductivity and the dielectric constant increase.
  • AgBr shows both Schottky and Frenkel defects.

Contrast. In non-stoichiometric defects the ratio does change. In metal-excess NaCl, for example, heating in Na vapour creates anion vacancies occupied by trapped electrons (F-centres), which make the crystal yellow. Such defects are not stoichiometric.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Full derivations, correct diagrams, and clear reasoning for all parts.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) State Heisenberg's principle and prove orthogonality of eigenfunctions for a 1D box. 10 marks

    derive— given → assumptions → stepwise derivation → result → check

    Must cover

    • State ΔxΔp ≥ ħ/2
    • Write normalized ψ₁ and ψ₂
    • Set up integral ∫₀ᴸ ψ₁ψ₂ dx
    • Evaluate integral to show zero

    Loses marks

    • Missing normalization factor √(2/L)
    • Incorrect limits of integration

    Earns more

    • Explicitly show sin(nπx/L) integration
    • Mention boundary conditions

    Extra mark

    • General proof for n≠m
  2. (b)(i) Calculate bond order for O₂, O₂⁻, O₂²⁻, O₂⁺ and identify most stable. 10 marks

    calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation

    Must cover

    • Correct electron count for each
    • Apply BO = (Nb-Na)/2
    • Calculate values 2, 1.5, 1, 2.5
    • Identify O₂⁺ as most stable

    Loses marks

    • Wrong electron count
    • Confusing bonding/antibonding orbitals

    Earns more

    • Show MO configuration for one species
    • Mention paramagnetism

    Extra mark

    • Correlate bond length with BO
  3. (b)(ii) Draw the molecular orbital energy level diagram for CO. 10 marks

    describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance

    Must cover

    • Show C and O atomic orbitals
    • Correct MO energy ordering
    • Fill 10 valence electrons
    • Label HOMO and LUMO

    Loses marks

    • Placing 5σ below 1π (O₂-type ordering); CO follows the N₂-like order with 1π below 5σ
    • Missing labels

    Earns more

    • Indicate σ/π symmetry
    • Show O atomic orbitals lower in energy than C (greater electronegativity)

    Extra mark

    • Mention dipole direction
  4. (c)(i) Derive limiting radius ratios for coordination numbers 3 and 6. 10 marks

    calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation

    Must cover

    • Draw geometry for CN=3 (triangular)
    • Derive ratio 0.155
    • Draw geometry for CN=6 (octahedral)
    • Derive ratio 0.414

    Loses marks

    • Missing geometric derivation
    • Wrong final values

    Earns more

    • Show geometric construction
    • State stability condition

    Extra mark

    • Mention CN=4 or CN=8
  5. (c)(ii) Define stoichiometric defects and provide an example. 10 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define stoichiometric defect
    • Explain Schottky defect
    • Explain Frenkel defect
    • Give specific example (e.g. NaCl)

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with non-stoichiometric
    • No example given

    Earns more

    • Mention density change
    • Note that both defects are entropy-favoured and their concentration rises with temperature

    Extra mark

    • Contrast with non-stoichiometric defects such as F-centres
What "Solve" is asking you to do

Choose the method, then carry it through to a final answer. Identifying what kind of problem this is and why that method applies is the first thing marked; a correct figure arrived at invisibly earns almost nothing.

Structure that answers it

Given data and what is required → method chosen, with the reason it applies → set-up (equation, circuit, free body, trial balance) → working, step by step → answer with units and any condition of validity

Where marks are lost

Doing the middle steps mentally and writing only the result. In mathematics papers, a further loss comes from giving a decimal where the exact value in surds or fractions was wanted, or from skipping the justification a part explicitly asks for.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Chemistry 2024 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in