Chemistry 2025 Paper I 50 marks Solve

Q2

(a) Find the probability of existence of a particle in a one-dimensional box of length 'a' in the region 0 ≤ x ≤ a/4 for the states n = 1, 2 and 3. (15 marks) (b) The standard reduction potential of oxygen under acidic conditions at 298 K is +1.23 V. What is the standard reduction potential for the four-electron reduction of O₂(g) under basic conditions? (15 marks) (c) The radii of Zn²⁺ and S²⁻ ions are 0·74 Å and 1·84 Å respectively. Determine the most stable form of arrangement of ions in ZnS crystal lattice. Draw the CCP (Cubic Close Packing) structure of ZnS. (15 marks) (d) In a sample of NaCl, one of every 10,000 sites, normally occupied by Na⁺, is occupied instead by Ca²⁺. Assuming that all of the Cl⁻ sites are fully occupied, what is the stoichiometry of the sample? (5 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) एक-विमीय डिब्बा, जिसकी लंबाई 'a' है, में एक कण के अस्तित्व की प्रायिकता को n = 1, 2 और 3 अवस्थाओं के लिए, 0 ≤ x ≤ a/4 क्षेत्र में ज्ञात कीजिए। (15 अंक) (b) अम्लीय स्थितियों में 298 K पर ऑक्सीजन का मानक अपचयन विभव +1.23 V है। क्षारीय स्थितियों में O₂(g) के चार-इलेक्ट्रॉन के साथ अपचयन के लिए मानक अपचयन विभव क्या है? (15 अंक) (c) Zn²⁺ और S²⁻ आयनों की त्रिज्याएँ क्रमानुसार 0·74 Å और 1·84 Å हैं। ZnS के क्रिस्टल जालक (crystal lattice) में आयनों के सबसे स्थिर ढाँचे की व्यवस्था को निर्धारित कीजिए। ZnS की CCP (घनीय निविड संकुलन) संरचना बनाइए। (15 अंक) (d) NaCl के एक नमूने में, प्रत्येक 10,000 स्थलों में से एक स्थल, जो सामान्यतः Na⁺ से अध्यासित होता है, उसके स्थान पर Ca²⁺ अध्यासित है। मान लीजिए कि Cl⁻ अपने सभी स्थलों पर पूर्णतः अध्यासित है, तो नमूने की स्टॉइकियोमीट्री क्या होगी? (5 अंक)

Directive word: Solve

This question asks you to solve. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Solve each sub-part systematically with clear mathematical derivations and logical reasoning. For (a), derive the probability using wavefunction integration (~30% time); for (b), apply Nernst equation with pH adjustment (~25% time); for (c), calculate radius ratio and identify structure type with diagram (~30% time); for (d), apply charge neutrality for defect chemistry (~15% time). Present calculations step-wise with proper units and significant figures.

Key points expected

  • For (a): Set up probability integral P = ∫₀^(a/4) |ψₙ|²dx using ψₙ = √(2/a) sin(nπx/a), evaluate for n=1,2,3 obtaining values ~0.091, 0.25, 0.303 respectively
  • For (b): Write half-reactions for acidic vs basic conditions, apply E°(basic) = E°(acidic) - (0.0591×4/4)log[H⁺]⁴ or use E° = 1.23 - 0.0591×pH at pH=14 to get ~0.40 V
  • For (b): Alternative correct approach using ΔG° = -nFE° and Kw relationship to find E° = +0.40 V for O₂ + 2H₂O + 4e⁻ → 4OH⁻
  • For (c): Calculate radius ratio r⁺/r⁻ = 0.74/1.84 = 0.402, identify range 0.414-0.732 for octahedral but note ZnS has tetrahedral coordination (zinc blende/wurtzite)
  • For (c): Draw CCP (fcc) structure of ZnS showing S²⁻ at lattice points and Zn²⁺ in alternate tetrahedral voids, or vice versa, with correct coordination numbers
  • For (d): Apply charge balance: for 10,000 Na⁺ sites, 9,999 Na⁺ + 1 Ca²⁺ requires 10,001 Cl⁻ for neutrality, giving stoichiometry Na₀.₉₉₉₉Ca₀.₀₀₀₁Cl₁.₀₀₀₁ or approximately Na₂CaCl₃ when scaled

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness22%11Correctly identifies quantum mechanical probability interpretation, Nernst equation applicability to pH-dependent potentials, radius ratio rules with tetrahedral exception for ZnS, and charge compensation in non-stoichiometric compoundsIdentifies most concepts correctly but confuses radius ratio ranges or misapplies charge neutrality condition in (d)Fundamental misconceptions: treats probability classically, ignores pH effect on reduction potential, or fails to recognize defect chemistry principles
Mechanism / equation20%10Writes complete wavefunctions with correct normalization, sets up proper integrals with limits; writes balanced half-reactions; applies correct radius ratio formula; establishes charge balance equation for defectsWrites most equations correctly but misses normalization constant or makes sign errors in Nernst applicationMissing key equations, incorrect half-reactions, or no mathematical setup for probability calculation
Numerical accuracy24%12Accurate values: P₁≈0.091, P₂=0.25, P₃≈0.303; E°(basic)≈+0.40 V; r⁺/r⁻=0.402; correct stoichiometry with proper significant figures throughoutCorrect methods but arithmetic errors in integration or final potential value; approximate stoichiometry without precise calculationMajor calculation errors, wrong orders of magnitude, or no numerical working shown
Diagram / structure18%9Clear CCP/fcc unit cell of ZnS showing both ion positions, tetrahedral voids occupied, correct coordination numbers (4:4), labeled axes, and distinction from NaCl structureBasic diagram drawn but missing key features like void positions or incorrect labeling of ion sitesNo diagram, or confused with simple cubic/NaCl structure, missing tetrahedral coordination entirely
Application context16%8Connects (a) to quantum confinement in nanomaterials, (b) to fuel cells/corrosion in Indian coastal environments, (c) to ZnS as phosphor in displays, (d) to doped NaCl for solid-state batteries; shows awareness of CSIR-NPL standardsBrief mention of one application or generic context without specific Indian relevanceNo contextual linkage; treats as purely academic exercise without real-world or national laboratory relevance

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Chemistry 2025 Paper I