Economics 2023 Paper I 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Examine

Q5

Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) "Factor intensity reversal is incompatible with Heckscher-Ohlin model." Examine this statement. (10 marks) (b) Why depreciation of a currency is inflationary? Explain. (10 marks) (c) Can Kuznet's hypothesis of an inverted U-curve be extended to analyse environmental degradation? Explain. (10 marks) (d) Explain how modified HDI is an improved measure of development over HDI. (10 marks) (e) How renewable energy use can help attain environmental sustainability? Explain. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक प्रश्न का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : (a) "कारक तीव्रता उत्क्रमण हेक्शर-ओहलिन मॉडल से असंगत है।" इस कथन का परीक्षण कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) किसी करेंसी का मूल्यह्रास स्फीतिक क्यों होता है? समझाइए। (10 अंक) (c) क्या कुज़नेट के एक उल्टे U-वक्र की परिकल्पना पर्यावरणीय अवक्षरण के विश्लेषण के लिए प्रयुक्त हो सकती है? व्याख्या कीजिए। (10 अंक) (d) समझाइए कि संशोधित एच.डी.आई. किस प्रकार एच.डी.आई. की अपेक्षा विकास की एक उन्नत माप है। (10 अंक) (e) नवीनीकरणीय ऊर्जा उपयोग किस प्रकार पर्यावरणीय पोषणीयता प्राप्त करने में सहायक है? समझाइये। (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Economics questions

Directive word: Examine

This question asks you to examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'examine' for part (a) requires critical analysis with evidence for and against; parts (b)-(e) use 'explain' demanding clear causal mechanisms. Allocate ~20% word budget to each sub-part (30 words each) given equal 10-mark weighting. Structure: brief definitional opening for each, followed by analytical core, and a concluding synthesis only if space permits. Prioritize precision over coverage—better to develop 4 parts excellently than all 5 superficially.

Key points expected

  • (a) Factor intensity reversal: Define as same good being capital-intensive in one country and labor-intensive in another; explain Leontief paradox as empirical evidence; note H-O model assumes no reversal, but reversal allows trade patterns contradicting H-O predictions; conclude with Minhas and Leontief findings on reversal.
  • (b) Currency depreciation-inflation link: Explain pass-through effect—imported inputs become costlier; demand-pull inflation via export-led demand surge; monetization of fiscal deficit if RBI intervenes; mention J-curve effect and India's 2013 taper tantrum episode.
  • (c) Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): Define inverted U-relationship between per capita income and environmental degradation; explain scale, composition, and technique effects; cite Grossman-Krueger study; note critique by Stern and India's mixed evidence on SO2 vs. CO2.
  • (d) Modified HDI (HDI-2010 onwards): Contrast with original HDI (arithmetic mean) to Inequality-adjusted HDI (geometric mean); explain how it accounts for distribution; mention addition of Gender Development Index and Multidimensional Poverty Index as complementary measures.
  • (e) Renewable energy-sustainability nexus: Explain substitution effect reducing fossil fuel lock-in; decentralized energy access for rural development; India's 500 GW non-fossil target by 2030; mention circular economy challenges in solar panel disposal.

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness25%12.5Precise definitions across all five parts: factor intensity reversal with isoquant-isocost tangency conditions; depreciation-inflation transmission mechanisms; EKC theoretical foundations with three effects; HDI formula change from arithmetic to geometric mean; renewable energy's multi-dimensional sustainability contribution.Generally correct definitions but conflates key distinctions—e.g., confuses depreciation with devaluation, or states EKC as universal law without caveats; minor errors in HDI calculation methodology.Fundamental conceptual errors—e.g., describes factor intensity reversal as factor price equalization, or claims depreciation is always deflationary; misidentifies modified HDI components.
Diagram / model15%7.5For (a): sketches isoquant map showing reversal with different factor price ratios; for (c): draws inverted U-curve with income on x-axis and pollution/emissions on y-axis; labels all axes, curves, and equilibrium points correctly.Mentions diagrams descriptively without actual sketch, or draws incomplete diagrams missing key labels; describes EKC verbally without graphical representation.No diagrams where essential; or completely wrong diagrams—e.g., AD-AS for depreciation-inflation link without specifying open-economy modifications.
Quantitative reasoning15%7.5Cites specific data: India's HDI rank (134 in 2021), renewable capacity figures (175 GW installed), or EKC turning point estimates ($5,000-8,000 per capita for SO2); notes HDI formula weights (1/3 each for health, education, income).Vague quantitative references—'India's HDI is low' or 'renewable energy growing fast' without numbers; correct formula structure but no computed illustration.No quantitative element; or fabricated/incorrect statistics that undermine credibility—e.g., stating HDI ranges 0-100 instead of 0-1.
Indian / empirical examples20%10Contextualized Indian evidence: for (b)—2013 rupee depreciation and WPI spike; for (c)—Delhi's air quality vs. per capita income trends; for (d)—India's HDI trajectory 1990-2021; for (e)—National Solar Mission, wind energy in Tamil Nadu, or Ladakh's carbon-neutral target.Generic developing country references without Indian specificity; or mentions India superficially without connecting to theoretical framework—e.g., 'India uses renewable energy' without policy linkage.No Indian examples; or inappropriate examples—e.g., citing US environmental policy for EKC or China's currency management for depreciation analysis.
Policy implication25%12.5Derives actionable insights: for (a)—implications for trade policy when H-O predictions fail; for (b)—RBI's inflation targeting response to currency volatility; for (c)—pollution haven hypothesis and environmental regulations; for (d)—targeted social sector spending to improve HDI components; for (e)—green hydrogen mission, grid integration challenges, and just transition for coal-dependent regions.States obvious policy conclusions without depth—e.g., 'government should promote renewable energy' without specifying instruments; or lists policies without connecting to theoretical analysis.No policy dimension; or contradictory recommendations—e.g., advocating currency depreciation to fight inflation, or suggesting environmental regulations will harm growth without nuance.

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Economics 2023 Paper I