Economics 2023 Paper I 50 marks Critically examine

Q8

(a) How important is rent from extraction of renewable and non-renewable resources to distinguish between Net Domestic Product (NDP) and Environmentally adjusted Domestic Product (EDP). Will the distinction be valid if we have an economy with only renewable resources and the economy reaches the point of maximum sustainable yield? (20 marks) (b) "Balanced and unbalanced growth strategies are not substitutes but complementary to each other." Discuss. (15 marks) (c) "Income inequality is not a cause of concern as long as per capita income is rising." Critically examine this statement. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) नवीनीकरणीय व गैर-नवीनीकरणीय संसाधनों के विदोहन से उत्पन्न लगान, शुद्ध घरेलु उत्पाद (एन.डी.पी.) एवं पर्यावरण-समायोजित उत्पाद (ई.डी.पी.) में भेद करने के लिये कितना महत्वपूर्ण है? यदि अर्थ व्यवस्था में केवल नवीनीकरणीय संसाधन हों तथा अर्थव्यवस्था अधिकतम-धारणीय उत्पादन के बिन्दु पर पहुँच गई हो, तो भी क्या यह विभेद मान्य होगा? (20 अंक) (b) "संतुलित व असंतुलित संवृद्धि-रणीतियों एक दूसरे की प्रतिस्थापक नहीं अपितु पूरक हैं।" चर्चा कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) "आय-असमानता चिंता का कारण नहीं है जब तक कि प्रति व्यक्ति आय में वृद्धि हो रही है।" इस कथन का आलोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Economics questions

Directive word: Critically examine

This question asks you to critically examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The question demands critical examination across three parts: begin with a brief introduction on sustainable development and measurement challenges, then allocate approximately 40% of content to part (a) on resource rents and green accounting, 30% to part (b) on balanced vs unbalanced growth synthesis, and 30% to part (c) on inequality-growth trade-offs. Conclude by integrating insights on inclusive, sustainable development strategy for India.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Distinguish NDP and EDP through resource rent depletion—non-renewable rents reduce EDP below NDP, while renewable rents at sustainable yield make EDP equal to NDP; cite Hartwick-Solow rule and El Serafy method
  • Part (a): Explain that at maximum sustainable yield (MSY), resource rent equals user cost of extraction, making net price zero and EDP identical to NDP—distinction becomes theoretically valid but empirically trivial
  • Part (b): Analyze balanced growth (Rosenstein-Rodan, Nurkse) and unbalanced growth (Hirschman, linkage effects) as sequential complements—balanced for infrastructure base, unbalanced for dynamic efficiency
  • Part (b): Demonstrate complementarity through India's experience: Second Five Year Plan's heavy industry focus (unbalanced) built on First Plan's irrigation and infrastructure (balanced)
  • Part (c): Critique the Kuznets hypothesis and trickle-down theory; present evidence from Deaton-Dreze, Piketty-Chancel on India showing rising inequality constrains human capital formation and political stability
  • Part (c): Discuss Amartya Sen's capability approach and inclusive growth metrics—per capita income rise with stagnant median wages (India's jobless growth) undermines development
  • Synthesize across parts: Sustainable, inclusive development requires green national accounting (a), strategic sequencing of growth patterns (b), and explicit distributional targets (c)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness22%11Precisely defines user cost, resource rent, Hotelling rule, and El Serafy depreciation; correctly applies MSY condition where marginal revenue equals marginal cost making net rent zero; accurately distinguishes Rosenstein-Rodan's big push from Hirschman's unbalanced growth and linkage effects; correctly critiques Kuznets curve and cites Sen's capability approachBasic definitions of NDP/EDP and balanced/unbalanced growth present but confuses resource rent with total revenue or misstates MSY condition; conflates complementary with simultaneous; superficial treatment of inequality critiqueFundamental confusion between GDP and EDP, treats balanced and unbalanced as mutually exclusive strategies, or accepts trickle-down without critique; significant conceptual errors across multiple parts
Diagram / model18%9Draws resource extraction path diagram showing depletion for non-renewables vs sustainable yield for renewables; illustrates Hirschman's linkage effects (backward/forward) with sectoral diagram; presents Lorenz curve or Sen index visualization for inequality analysisMentions diagrams without clear construction or labels axes incorrectly; generic growth model without specific application to question partsNo diagrams where clearly required (especially for MSY and linkage effects), or diagrams that misrepresent economic relationships
Quantitative reasoning16%8Demonstrates algebra of El Serafy user cost formula (rent = (P-MC)Q, true income = rent - depletion); calculates that at MSY, dR/dt = 0 implies sustainable rent equals opportunity cost; references India's Gini coefficient trends (0.35 to 0.45+) or wealth inequality (Piketty data)Qualitative mention of quantitative methods without working through logic; cites statistics without connecting to theoretical frameworkNo quantitative element where clearly applicable; incorrect arithmetic or misinterpretation of inequality indices
Indian / empirical examples22%11For (a): cites India's green GDP estimates (Mongolia pilot, CSO environmental accounting); for (b): analyzes Second Plan heavy industry strategy following First Plan infrastructure; for (c): uses NREGA, MGNREGS wage effects, or Kerala vs Bihar human development comparisons; references recent Oxfam or World Inequality Report dataGeneric developing country examples or outdated references; Indian examples mentioned without analytical integrationNo Indian examples where clearly applicable, or factually incorrect references (e.g., attributing unbalanced growth to Mahalanobis incorrectly)
Policy implication22%11Derives integrated policy: green national accounting for resource management (a), strategic unbalancing within balanced framework for structural transformation (b), and progressive taxation plus social protection for inclusive growth (c); connects to India's SDG commitments and climate targetsGeneric policy recommendations without specificity to Indian context or question synthesis; lists policies without prioritizationNo policy implications drawn, or recommendations contradict theoretical analysis; purely descriptive without prescriptive element

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Economics 2023 Paper I