GS Paper I — Q13
"There arose a serious challenge to the Democratic State System between the two World Wars." Evaluate the statement. (Answer in…
"There arose a serious challenge to the Democratic State System between the two World Wars." Evaluate the statement. (Answer in 250 words) 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
"दोनों विश्व युद्धों के बीच लोकतांत्रिक राज्य प्रणाली के लिए एक गंभीर चुनौती उत्पन्न हुई ।" इस कथन का मूल्यांकन कीजिए । (250 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए)
Model answer
Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.
Between the two World Wars, the Democratic State System faced a serious challenge, but it was not terminal. The crisis was ideological, economic and political.
The most direct assault came from fascism and Nazism. Mussolini’s seizure of power in Italy (1922) and Hitler’s appointment in Germany (1933) dismantled parliamentary institutions, suppressed opposition and replaced pluralism with one-party authoritarianism. This model spread: Franco’s Spain, Salazar’s Portugal and Eastern European authoritarian regimes in Poland and Hungary showed that liberal democracy was not the only path to state consolidation.
The Great Depression of 1929 deepened the challenge. Deflation, mass unemployment and social polarization delegitimised liberal democratic capitalism, making voters receptive to radical alternatives. The Soviet Union added a communist counter-model, challenging liberal democracy ideologically and geopolitically by promising planned development and class rule.
Yet democracy showed resilience. Suffrage expanded, especially women’s voting rights in Britain, the USA and Germany, while Britain, France, the USA and Dominions retained constitutional frameworks despite severe strains. In India, the Government of India Act 1919 and the Government of India Act 1935 introduced limited representative institutions, demonstrating that democratic experiments could advance even under colonial constraints.
Thus, the challenge was severe and regionally uneven: Europe was most vulnerable, while Western democracies and colonial constitutional reforms preserved democratic possibilities. The interwar crisis exposed the fragility of democracy but did not destroy it; it forced later democracies to combine political rights with economic security.
What "Evaluate" is asking you to do
Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion.
Structure that answers it
Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict
Where marks are lost
Presenting both sides and then declining to decide, or delivering a verdict against a standard you never stated, which makes it look arbitrary.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Framework: GS1 History/Polity. evaluate: criteria > evidence > balanced judgment Full marks: Analytically links economic crisis to the rise of authoritarianism and evaluates the specific failure of democratic institutions.
Key points expected
- Rise of totalitarianism (Fascism/Nazism) as a direct challenge
- Economic instability (Great Depression) undermining democratic governance
- Failure of the League of Nations to maintain order
- Erosion of liberal democratic norms and civil liberties
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- The answer Assess the validity of the claim that the inter-war period posed a serious challenge to democratic state systems. · 250 words
evaluate— criteria → evidence → balanced judgment
Must cover
- Rise of totalitarianism (Fascism/Nazism) as a direct challenge
- Economic instability (Great Depression) undermining democratic governance
- Failure of the League of Nations to maintain order
- Erosion of liberal democratic norms and civil liberties
Loses marks
- Narrating WWI or WWII battles chronologically
- Focusing only on India's freedom struggle
- Ignoring the economic causes of political instability
Earns more
- Mention of specific regimes (Mussolini, Hitler, Franco)
- Reference to the Weimar Republic's collapse
- Discussion of appeasement policy as a democratic failure
- Contrast with the survival of democracy in UK/USA
Extra mark
- Citation of specific dates (1929, 1933, 1939)
- Reference to specific treaties or agreements (Munich Agreement)
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from General Studies 2021 GS Paper I
- Q10 Examine the role of 'Gig Economy' in the process of empowerment of women in India. (Answe…
- Q11 To what extent did the role of the Moderates prepare a base for the wider freedom movemen…
- Q12 Bring out the constructive programmes of Mahatma Gandhi during Non-Cooperation Movement a…
- Q13 "There arose a serious challenge to the Democratic State System between the two World War…
- Q14 Briefly mention the alignment of major mountain ranges of the world and explain their imp…
- Q15 How do the melting of the Arctic ice and glaciers of the Antarctic differently affect the…
- Q16 Discuss the multi-dimensional implications of uneven distribution of mineral oil in the w…