Geography 2021 Paper I 50 marks Mention

Paper I — Q6

(a) Development-induced displacement poses serious challenges. Mention its causes, consequences and solutions. (20 marks) (b)…

(a)

Development-induced displacement poses serious challenges. Mention its causes, consequences and solutions. 20 marks

(b)

Describe the role of accessibility and affordability in food security of developing world. 15 marks

(c)

The environmental issues are not adequately addressed in the regional planning. Comment. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

विकास-जनित विस्थापन गम्भीर चुनौतियों को प्रस्तुत करता है। इसके कारणों, परिणामों एवं समाधानों का उल्लेख कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(b)

विकासशील विश्व की खाद्य सुरक्षा में अभिगम्यता और सामर्थ्य की भूमिका का वर्णन कीजिए । (15 अंक)

(c)

प्रादेशिक नियोजन में पर्यावरणीय मुद्दों को पर्याप्त रूप से सम्बोधित नहीं किया जाता है । टिप्पणी कीजिए । (15 अंक)

Q6 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Geography Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Geography paper

Model answer

Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.

Development-induced displacement, food insecurity, and environmental degradation reflect structural imbalances where economic growth overrides spatial equity, human entitlements, and ecological carrying capacities.

Development-Induced Displacement: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions

Development-induced displacement is driven by large-scale land acquisitions for multi-purpose hydro-projects (e.g., Narmada Valley), open-cast mining in mineral-rich indigenous belts, Special Economic Zones (SEZs), transport corridors, and urban renewal programs.

Its consequences align with Michael Cernea’s Impoverishment Risks and Reconstruction (IRR) model:

  • Economic dispossession through landlessness, joblessness, and the loss of Common Property Resources (CPRs), which directly undermines household nutrition.
  • Socio-cultural fragmentation, psychological trauma, and erosion of traditional knowledge systems.
  • Disproportionate gendered vulnerabilities, as women lose informal safety nets, water-fuelwood access, and economic agency.
  • Creation of "development refugees" who drift into marginal urban informal sectors.

Solutions require a shift from mere monetary compensation to comprehensive rehabilitation:

  • Enforcing Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) through frameworks like PESA 1996 and the Forest Rights Act 2006.
  • Rigorous implementation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (RFCTLARR) Act, 2013, prioritizing "land-for-land" compensation.
  • Pre-displacement social impact assessments and long-term livelihood restoration via institutional capacity building and benefit-sharing mechanisms.

Role of Accessibility and Affordability in Food Security

Food security in the developing world relies heavily on Amartya Sen’s Entitlement Approach, which posits that starvation is a function of collapsed access and exchange entitlements rather than gross output deficits.

Accessibility encompasses the physical and geographic reach of food systems. It requires resilient rural-urban transport corridors, cold-storage logistics, and decentralized market nodes. In the developing world, infrastructural deficits create severe spatial frictions: monsoon isolations cut off riverine tracts, while rapid, unplanned urbanization spawns urban "food deserts" where low-income settlements lack physical access to fresh produce. Digital delivery networks and modernized agricultural supply chains are emerging to bridge this last-mile gap.

Affordability represents the economic capacity to purchase adequate food without compromising other basic needs. It is dictated by real wage rates, purchasing power parity, and household vulnerability to volatile commodity markets. Developing nations address structural affordability gaps through safety nets such as the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), Minimum Support Prices (MSP), and targeted direct benefit transfers, protecting vulnerable populations from food-price shocks.

Environmental Blind Spots in Regional Planning

Regional planning has persistently treated the environment as an externality, prioritizing aggregate GDP expansion, urban agglomeration economies, and sectoral growth over ecological boundaries. This stems from short-term political horizons, weak enforcement of post-clearance Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), fragmented inter-state coordination across contiguous river basins, and a general disregard for spatial carrying capacities.

Consequently, development corridors often aggravate environmental degradation, causing topsoil loss, groundwater depletion, and urban heat islands. To rectify this, regional planning must transition toward John Friedmann’s territorial planning paradigm. Planning authorities must operationalize:

  • Carrying-capacity-based regional master plans that integrate climate-adaptive land-use zoning.
  • The "ridge-to-reef" watershed management approach to secure ecological continuums across administrative boundaries.
  • Ecosystem Services Valuation (ESV) to factor natural capital degradation directly into cost-benefit regional accounting.

The challenges of displacement, food insecurity, and ecological distress are deeply interconnected. True regional sustainability requires moving beyond growth-pole orthodoxies to establish integrated spatial frameworks that protect local entitlements, respect ecological thresholds, and advance inclusive regional resilience.

What "Mention" is asking you to do

Put specific factual content on record — the names, features, targets or instances the stem asks for. Mention is usually the subordinate half of a larger question, so it must be done fully but quickly, leaving room for the part that carries the main directive.

Structure that answers it

The items named directly, without preamble → one qualifying detail against each → straight on to the part of the stem the marks actually sit in

Where marks are lost

Gesturing at the category instead of naming the particulars, or expanding it until the analytical half of the question is squeezed.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

(a) challenges: 3-4 challenges > solutions mapped to them > conclusion | (b) describe: define > structure or process in order > labelled diagram > significance | (c) comment: context > arguments both sides > judgment > close Full marks: Comprehensive causal chains, precise examples, clear diagrams, and balanced judgments.

Key points expected

  • Causes: dams, mining, industrialization, infrastructure
  • Consequences: loss of livelihood, social fragmentation
  • Solutions: Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) policy
  • Diagram: Flowchart of displacement process
  • Define food security (availability, access, utilization)
  • Accessibility: transport, storage, market linkages
  • Affordability: income levels, price volatility
  • Diagram: Food security framework or supply chain

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Causal chain of displacement: causes, consequences, and mapped solutions. 20 marks

    challenges— 3-4 challenges → solutions mapped to them → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Causes: dams, mining, industrialization, infrastructure
    • Consequences: loss of livelihood, social fragmentation
    • Solutions: Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) policy
    • Diagram: Flowchart of displacement process

    Loses marks

    • Listing causes without linking to consequences
    • Solutions not mapped to specific challenges
    • No diagram or visual aid

    Earns more

    • Reference to specific Indian projects (e.g., Narmada)
    • Mention of 'Right to Fair Compensation' Act
    • Distinction between voluntary and involuntary displacement

    Extra mark

    • Data on specific displacement figures (e.g., Narmada)
    • Sketch map of a major displacement site
  2. (b) Role of accessibility and affordability in food security. 15 marks

    describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance

    Must cover

    • Define food security (availability, access, utilization)
    • Accessibility: transport, storage, market linkages
    • Affordability: income levels, price volatility
    • Diagram: Food security framework or supply chain

    Loses marks

    • Confusing availability with access
    • Ignoring the 'developing world' context
    • No diagram or visual aid

    Earns more

    • Mention of Public Distribution System (PDS)
    • Reference to 'food miles' or logistics costs
    • Link to poverty and inequality

    Extra mark

    • Specific example of a food desert or surplus region
    • Data on food inflation or subsidy costs
  3. (c) Critique of environmental issues in regional planning. 15 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Context: Regional planning objectives vs. environmental goals
    • Arguments for: economic growth, rapid development
    • Arguments against: ecological degradation, resource depletion
    • Judgment: Need for integrated environmental planning

    Loses marks

    • One-sided argument without balance
    • No clear judgment or conclusion
    • Vague generalities without specific examples

    Earns more

    • Mention of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
    • Reference to 'Sustainable Development' goals
    • Example of a failed or successful regional plan

    Extra mark

    • Specific case study (e.g., Ganga Action Plan)
    • Reference to a specific policy or act

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Geography 2021 Paper I