Geography 2023 Paper II 50 marks Examine

Q2

(a) Examine the environmental challenges caused by the solid waste in metropolitan regions of India and discuss the efforts to overcome it. 20 (b) Why are millets considered as 'nutri-cereals' and climate-resilient? Discuss the constraints and opportunities of millet cultivation in India. 15 (c) Examine the geostrategic significance of Indian islands. 15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) भारत के महानगरीय क्षेत्रों में ठोस अपशिष्ट के कारण उत्पन्न पर्यावरणीय चुनौतियों का परीक्षण कीजिए और इस पर काबू पाने के प्रयासों की विवेचना कीजिए। 20 (b) मोटे अनाज को 'पोषक अनाज' और जलवायु-लचीला क्यों माना जाता है? भारत में मोटे अनाज की खेती की बाधाओं और (सु)अवसरों की विवेचना कीजिए। 15 (c) भारतीय द्वीपों के भू-रणनीतिक महत्व का परीक्षण कीजिए। 15

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Geography questions

Directive word: Examine

This question asks you to examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'examine' requires critical investigation of causes and implications. For part (a) carrying 20 marks, spend ~40% word budget analyzing solid waste challenges and SWM Rules 2016; for (b) with 'discuss' and 'why' directives (15 marks), allocate ~30% on nutritional profiles, C4 photosynthesis, and cultivation constraints in rainfed regions; for (c) with 'examine' (15 marks), reserve ~30% for island geostrategy including Andaman-Sumatra chokepoint and Lakshadweep maritime security. Structure: integrated introduction on environmental-geography nexus, three distinct body sections with sub-headings, and a synthesizing conclusion linking urban sustainability, food security, and maritime power.

Key points expected

Part (a): Metropolitan solid waste characterization (biodegradable 50-60%, plastic 8-10%), leachate contamination of groundwater, methane emissions from dumpsites, and implementation gaps in SWM Rules 2016 including biomining and C&D waste processing
Part (a): Specific urban initiatives—Indore model (7-time cleanest city), Surat's landfill mining, Delhi's Okhla and Ghazipur landfill fires, and role of Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban 2.0
Part (b): Nutritional superiority of millets—high protein (11%), calcium, iron, fiber; low glycemic index; gluten-free status; and climate resilience through C4 photosynthesis, drought tolerance, and short growing period (60-90 days)
Part (b): Constraints (low yield, lack of MSP procurement, processing infrastructure, changing dietary preferences) and opportunities (UN International Year of Millets 2023, millet missions in Karnataka, Odisha, Madhya Pradesh; export potential to Africa/Middle East)
Part (c): Andaman & Nicobar Islands—control of Six Degree Channel (Malacca Strait alternative), INS Baaz, tri-service command, and strategic deterrence against Chinese 'String of Pearls'
Part (c): Lakshadweep—Nine Degree Channel significance, Minicoy Island's proximity to Maldives, potential for seabed resources, and emerging concerns in India-China maritime competition

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	20%	10	Demonstrates precise understanding across all parts: for (a) distinguishes between dumpsites, landfills, and scientific landfilling with correct technical terms (leachate, biomethanation, RDF); for (b) accurately explains C4 photosynthesis pathway, anti-nutritional factors (phytic acid), and distinction between major (sorghum, pearl millet) and minor millets; for (c) correctly identifies chokepoints, EEZ boundaries, and distinguishes between tactical versus strategic significance of island chains	Shows basic familiarity with concepts but conflates terms (e.g., treats all waste as 'garbage' without segregation categories); describes millets as 'coarse cereals' without nutritional specificity; mentions islands as 'important' without explaining maritime geography concepts like sea lines of communication	Fundamental conceptual errors: confuses solid waste with sewage/wastewater; describes millets only as 'poor man's food' without nutritional or climate science; treats islands merely as tourist destinations without any geostrategic framework; invents non-existent policies or geographic relationships
Map / diagram	15%	7.5	Includes at least two relevant sketch maps: for (c) a strategically annotated map showing Andaman-Nicobar and Lakshadweep positions relative to Malacca Strait, Six Degree Channel, and major SLOCs with directional arrows; alternatively for (a) a waste management flow diagram or for (b) a map showing millet cultivation zones (Deccan plateau, Rajasthan, Gujarat) with agro-climatic markers; all maps properly titled, scaled, and integrated with textual analysis	Provides one generic map (e.g., outline of India with islands marked but no strategic annotations) or attempts a diagram that lacks specificity (e.g., simple pie chart for waste composition without integration); maps present but not effectively utilized to advance argument	No maps or diagrams; or completely irrelevant sketches (e.g., random topographic cross-sections); maps drawn without any labels or so poorly executed that they convey no geographic information; mere decorative elements without analytical purpose
Indian regional examples	25%	12.5	Rich regional specificity across all parts: for (a) compares Delhi's Ghazipur/Bhalswa landfill crises with Mumbai's Deonar fire history and Chennai's Kodungaiyur flooding; for (b) contrasts Karnataka's ragi cultivation (Mandya) with Rajasthan's bajra belt (Jodhpur-Bikaner) and Odisha's millet mission in tribal districts; for (c) distinguishes between Andaman's military infrastructure (INS Baaz, Campbell Bay) and Lakshadweep's civilian maritime security concerns with specific island names (Kavaratti, Minicoy, Agatti)	Mentions some regional examples but unevenly distributed—strong on one part, weak on others; examples lack specificity (e.g., 'cities like Delhi and Mumbai' without elaboration; 'south India' for millets without state-level detail; 'islands in Bay of Bengal' without naming Andaman specifically)	Virtually no Indian examples; or only generic references ('metros,' 'tribal areas,' 'coastal islands') without any named locations; examples factually wrong (e.g., placing millets primarily in Punjab; confusing Lakshadweep with Maldives sovereignty; citing non-existent waste plants)
Spatial analysis	20%	10	Demonstrates sophisticated spatial thinking: for (a) analyzes how urban morphology (sprawl, informal settlements) creates spatial mismatches between waste generation and processing facilities; for (b) explains spatial distribution of millets through rainfall gradients, soil types (alfisols, vertisols), and altitude; for (c) applies critical geopolitical analysis—distance decay from mainland, buffer zone functions, and archipelagic baselines under UNCLOS; connects all three parts through themes of resource geography and territoriality	Some spatial awareness but underdeveloped: mentions location of landfills or islands without analyzing spatial relationships; describes distribution patterns without explaining underlying geographic processes; treats each part in isolation without thematic connections	No spatial analysis whatsoever; purely aspatial description (e.g., lists waste problems without geographic distribution; describes millet nutrition without any reference to where they grow; treats islands as disconnected points without analyzing their relative positions, distances, or maritime space)
Application / policy	20%	10	Critically evaluates policy effectiveness with specific evidence: for (a) assesses SWM Rules 2016 implementation gaps, Extended Producer Responsibility for plastics, and innovative models like Indore's GIS-based monitoring or Surat's PPP waste-to-energy plant; for (b) analyzes National Millet Mission, MSP revisions (2022-23), FPO promotion, and export policy opportunities; for (c) evaluates Andaman & Nicobar Command integration, proposed Great Nicobar transhipment port, and Lakshadweep development versus ecological sensitivity; suggests evidence-based improvements for each	Mentions relevant policies but descriptively rather than evaluatively (lists SWM Rules, millet year, or naval bases without assessing outcomes); some policy discussion but lacks critical edge or specific implementation details; generic recommendations without grounding in geographic realities	No policy discussion or completely irrelevant policies; naive recommendations ('government should do more'); factually incorrect policy references (e.g., placing millets under NFSA entitlements without noting current status, confusing coastal regulation zones); purely theoretical with no applied dimension

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →